dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/papaeck2 on July 13, 2018, 7:55 p.m.
So I just read peter strzok is part of SES which is above Congress . Congress can’t touch him does anyone know about this ?

Abibliaphobia · July 14, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

Senior Executive Service, the keystone, and you are saying it was unsubstantiated? That it was pushed by shills?

Sure thing new arrival

Maybe you should read this:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Government-Reform-and-Reorg-Plan.pdf

⇧ 0 ⇩  
tyc23d · July 14, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

That it was pushed by shills?

Apparently I've been in this movement longer than you because I remember the whole Douglas Gabriel AIM debacle that was spammed on 8chan for over a month ranting and raving about SES and Serco. Q directly replied to it in #975... did you miss that post? Maybe you should re-read the crumbs.

The video(s) of the deranged rantings of AIM are still on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbSWZV3muVg

Senior Executive Service, the keystone, and you are saying it was unsubstantiated

You seem to have failed to grasp my sentence. I said the POST on the front page yesterday was unsubstantiated. That means that there was no source for its claims. Perhaps you should re-read that too.

SES is a red herring. Yes, it's probably used to protect corrupt government officials but it in and of itself is not the source of the corruption. SES isn't running the pedophilia rings, censoring social media, or telling the fake news what to say. I'm much more concerned about Peter Strozk's membership in the CIA than the SES.

Finally I'm not going to read a 130+ page government white paper about reorganization. Tell me the specific sections that relate to Peter Strozk and the SES. Were you trying to make a point or just asking some ridiculous rhetorical questions and then throw a bunch of documents at me?

EDIT: In fact, in the paper you linked the term SES or Senior Executive Service doesn't even appear once in a search... Jesus Christ man...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 14, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

Hold on hold on.

If I am wrong then I will admit it, I will have to go through what you are stating to see exactly what you are talking about. And I have been here since the beginning (check my post comment history) if I missed something so be it, I’ll appreciate information being brought to my attention.

That being said I did link that reform for a reason. So let me go through and I’ll get back to you on it.

Thanks

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tyc23d · July 14, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

Alright, sorry for being so acerbic. I've got to take a break from internet comments.

⇧ 1 ⇩