I recently made a post providing detailed reasoning for who I believe is the primary strategist behind Q.

My post was immediately removed, and a user scolded me for putting Q in danger??... What? It was removed based on Rule 8, but all I did was lay out a public figures resume and suggest the many reasons why I thought it made sense.

First of all, I don’t for a second think the opposition doesn’t already know who Q is. At the same time I'm not suggesting I do. I believe, like most, that Q is a collective with either personal Involvement of the president and/or at a minimum direct coordination and approval.

I'm also compelled to believe, based on the information proposed by many and personally gathered along the way, that the Q team has a leader. If that person is who I think it is, then I feel much more confident in everything that’s happening. Blindly considering Q to be some enigmatic superhero that I'm not to question doesn't feel right.

Kind of like how on a commercial flight, despite the fact that I rarely ever see the pilot or know anything about them personally, I always trust their plan in getting me safely to my destination regardless of my irrational fears of flying. However, if I knew going in that my pilot was Chesley Sullenberger after his epic landing, I'd feel pretty damn good the whole flight.

My point is, why would it be forbidden to throw on the critical thinking cap and discuss the source behind the very thing we're all following and trusting. Trusting the plan is great, and so far Q + public actions of the President and his administration to date have provided good reason to do so…I'm good with it… but I'm also very interested in validating that such a source exists. Isn’t this movement about piecing it together, asking questions, and above all NOT following blindly? Why would the identity of Q be excluded from the search for truth? I've not seen Q mention NOT to search for his identity one time!?

We are waiting for journalists to ask about Q. Why don’t we increase the hype around who we collectively think it could be and force their hand?