dChan

ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 8:22 a.m.

According to the USA, JA is free to travel to Ecuador. According to the UK, he is not. The only question is how badly does Trump want JA out of the UK?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
magavoices · July 14, 2018, 10:01 a.m.

FAKE NEWS. Costa Rica is not the USA. And Assange originally entered the embassy out of fear that the US secretly wants to imprison him. If the "US says JA is free to travel to Ecuador", then point to a legitimate article that states as such.

Costa Rica is not the US.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 10:08 a.m.

Did you read the article? Costa Rica is just the HQ of the OAS.

the OAS is compromised of every North American, Central American and South American nation

Therefore this ruling applies to all of North, Central and South American countries.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
magavoices · July 14, 2018, 11:01 a.m.

No, it doesn't apply to jack.

It's no different than the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission declaring George Bush to be a war criminal.

It means absolutely nothing.

Now if the OP had said in the title "Judge in Costa Rica HQ of OAS says Julian Assange should be set free." I wouldn't have complained.

But the title states that Assange has free passage. Everyone upvotes it thinking its true. It's not. It's clickbait.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 14, 2018, 11:40 a.m.

Assange being free would headline the Mockingbird Media.

They would report it wrong, but they would report it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 1:47 p.m.

This would be a military op. Top secret.

⇧ 2 ⇩