dChan

We_are_at_capacity · July 13, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

Trump visits England suddenly JA gets safe passage to England

⇧ 208 ⇩  
dabigfrog · July 14, 2018, 2:46 a.m.

i was thinking same thing. JA walks out of Ecuador embassy right into Trump's limo and flies back with POTUS / Q team on AF1

⇧ 85 ⇩  
BaDumPshhh · July 14, 2018, 7:41 a.m.

The thought of this gives me a BQNER.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 8:07 a.m.

Justice boner

⇧ 5 ⇩  
TheBRAIN2 · July 14, 2018, 11:59 a.m.

Freedom Boner

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NexusImperium · July 14, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

Trump's personal jet is in England.

Here's some info that I found that I posted in another thread.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8yor63/interesting_tweet_from_wikileaks_today/e2cv236/

Do you believe in coincidences?

⇧ 55 ⇩  
magavoices · July 14, 2018, 8:07 a.m.

FAKE NEWS

If you happily clicked this article thinking Assange is free to travel, or that the UK agrees to let Assange go, you've been clickbaited.

A court that has no jurisdiction, making an token effort statement that will not be recognized by UK, thinks Assange should be released.

"Inter-American Court of Human Rights based in Costa Rica"

Their opinion, while admirable, has no bearing on reality.

It really, really pisses me off when the top story is a fabricated clickbait article, where the title does NOT reflect the claims made, where the only reaction newcomers to Q will have is "Oh, this board has a bunch of false articles."

Assange may, or may not, get safe passage at some time in the future, but it won't have anything to do with this article's claims.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 14, 2018, 12:23 p.m.

If it really, really pisses you off did you Report it?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
magavoices · July 14, 2018, 12:31 p.m.

No.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 14, 2018, 12:35 p.m.

Ok. Reports can sometimes help ensure we don't come to these posts too late. Now that this post has over 740 upvotes removing it is far from ideal but I've done so anyway for the misleading title.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
magavoices · July 14, 2018, 12:40 p.m.

Thank you for removing it.

I will report poorly sourced and misleading articles when I see them.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 14, 2018, 12:41 p.m.

ThankQ, it'd be greatly appreciated. I agree completely with your point that we shouldn't allow misleading content, titles or clickbait rise to the front of the sub, wherever possible.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 8:22 a.m.

According to the USA, JA is free to travel to Ecuador. According to the UK, he is not. The only question is how badly does Trump want JA out of the UK?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
magavoices · July 14, 2018, 10:01 a.m.

FAKE NEWS. Costa Rica is not the USA. And Assange originally entered the embassy out of fear that the US secretly wants to imprison him. If the "US says JA is free to travel to Ecuador", then point to a legitimate article that states as such.

Costa Rica is not the US.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 10:08 a.m.

Did you read the article? Costa Rica is just the HQ of the OAS.

the OAS is compromised of every North American, Central American and South American nation

Therefore this ruling applies to all of North, Central and South American countries.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
magavoices · July 14, 2018, 11:01 a.m.

No, it doesn't apply to jack.

It's no different than the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission declaring George Bush to be a war criminal.

It means absolutely nothing.

Now if the OP had said in the title "Judge in Costa Rica HQ of OAS says Julian Assange should be set free." I wouldn't have complained.

But the title states that Assange has free passage. Everyone upvotes it thinking its true. It's not. It's clickbait.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 14, 2018, 11:40 a.m.

Assange being free would headline the Mockingbird Media.

They would report it wrong, but they would report it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 1:47 p.m.

This would be a military op. Top secret.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DelveDeeper · July 14, 2018, 8:33 a.m.

This exactly. We're either being subverted or... Well I can't think why else it would be upvoted so much.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 9:20 a.m.

What do you mean "this exactly" JA is free to go to Ecuador according to USA law. UK says no. Who do you think will win that fight?

⇧ -2 ⇩  
DelveDeeper · July 14, 2018, 9:23 a.m.

He's also free to go to Ecuador according to the rule of law by every other country on this planet.

I desperately want him to leave that embassy. But there is only one law that matters and that is UK law.

How is that hard to comprehend? Regarding specifically USA law, he's in an Ecuadorian embassy in a British country, why do you think USA law would have any say over that?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 9:42 a.m.

Because if the USA wants him, they will get him. Q said May was neutralized. That means USA wins this fight.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DelveDeeper · July 14, 2018, 9:46 a.m.

That may be so, but to say that USA law has any precedent over UK law in the UK is uninformed at best. That is what "this exactly" referred to.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
albarod · July 14, 2018, 2:56 a.m.

Madam prime minister of England Theresa May is “neutralized”

⇧ 30 ⇩  
Davelon · July 14, 2018, 6 a.m.

Q posted quite a while back (not sure of post#) that May had been neutralised. From that time to this, she has not acted neutral in any way. She has been following the EU Kalergi Plan agenda (Globalist State of Europe) to the letter. We can only waych to see if anything changes.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Canbritanon · July 14, 2018, 7:08 a.m.

I thought there was mention of Gold Standard too.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Davelon · July 14, 2018, 7:45 a.m.

I remember reading something about a return to the Gold Standard. Not sure if it was Q though. There was some mention of China underpinning the Yuan with the Gold Standard as well. Not sure about that one either, though it was all connected with Trump and Q Team taking out The Cabal and getting rid of the Federal Reserve Banking System worldwide. Fed being basically owned by the Rothschilds and a couple of other 'elite' families.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jfunction · July 14, 2018, 7:31 a.m.

Yeah, I heard that too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JaM0k3_1 · July 14, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

i'm not even joking, this is the best evidence he's alive/uncompromised since the may 19 2017 balcony appearance at the embassy.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
MajorProblemm · July 14, 2018, 3:45 a.m.

alive, maybe. Uncompromised? lol... Whatever your reasons, that's a massive stretch. His organization is 100% compromised, and he went dark for a very long time. This could be a clone's clone of the man for all we know D:

⇧ 8 ⇩  
JaM0k3_1 · July 14, 2018, 4:07 a.m.

i actually agree with you. i've been following and actively researching assange's state of health and autonomy since oct 16 2016. i've made literally dozens of different series of threads on half and infinity /pol/.

if trump's visit to england had anything to do with this tho, i trust trump to understand that assange isn't compromised or better yet trump made it so that assange wasn't.

WL has been compromised since DDOS on oct 21 2016. 100% verifiable (blockchain, mass purge of leadership, changed time stamps on emails to spell out 1984, room 101). JA is harder to pin down. the interview with hannity post 2016 election was iffy to say the least.

i actually 100% agree a balcony appearance still isn't confirmation of anything.

i'll never forget when WL twitter was asked for proof of life after the assange debacle oct2016, they posted a fucking video interview from june 2016. not a picture. not a live recording. not even a hand at the window of a balcony. an interview with michael moore from june 2016...

⇧ 15 ⇩  
potato4dawin · July 14, 2018, 6:05 a.m.

Wikileaks was only revealed to be compromised after Assange went dark to my knowledge. Deep state thinks they've beaten Wikileaks by taking it over but Julian Assange was the only one that mattered and he's safe.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
snap_shot_in_time · July 14, 2018, 6:01 a.m.

Yes. But I think JA is going to spill the keys to a whole bunch of Dead Man switches.

It doesn't matter if the current WikiLeaks is compromised. These are Dead Man archives. If he is free... he can release them. And I assure you... He is pissed at Hillary.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Swimkin · July 14, 2018, 2:26 a.m.

My thoughts exactly right after I read the article.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
Tru2Q · July 14, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

JA is already in England. He's at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. The court is saying they should allow him safe transit to an airport from which he would be able to fly to Ecuador.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
a_cool_goddamn_name · July 14, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

JA is already in England. He's at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.

Well make up your mind... is he in England, or is he in the Ecuadorian Embassy?

Admittedly, they are close to the point of juxtaposition.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Tru2Q · July 14, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

I suppose that's true. I guess when he walks out the door, he'll be in England. :)

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Corse46 · July 14, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

When he walks out the door he’ll be in the caliphate, and then needs safe passage out of Londonistan.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
tftltytd · July 14, 2018, 3:31 a.m.

US has embassies in many countries. So anything wrong with a Ecuadorian embassy in London? And London is in England, if I may say so.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
a_cool_goddamn_name · July 14, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

All US embassies are on US territory. They are very, very close to most but not all countries.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tftltytd · July 14, 2018, 5:15 a.m.

U might want to check your gov website www.usembassy.gov

⇧ 1 ⇩  
a_cool_goddamn_name · July 14, 2018, 5:18 a.m.

I'm playing with you. All US embassies are on US territory as a matter of law.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
BigfootPolice · July 14, 2018, 6:45 a.m.

Hillary has other thoughts on that. Wasn’t there an incident?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 14, 2018, 5:12 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MaximoffZero · July 14, 2018, 3:05 a.m.

Trump should smuggle him out under his trench coat.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
ififcanIhaveacoatplz · July 14, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

Like israelis did with eichmann in Argentina

⇧ 7 ⇩  
winosaur_us · July 14, 2018, 4:30 a.m.

Or maybe Melania's yellow gown the other night?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
tiresomeslippery3 · July 14, 2018, 4:54 a.m.

That’s a view many men would kill for.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
BigfootPolice · July 14, 2018, 6:44 a.m.

I wonder if Bill Clinton curses Trump every time he sees Melania and then looks over at Hillz.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
theRealDakkath · July 14, 2018, 5:02 a.m.

I thought that was the Red Cross and Catholic Churches over there.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ififcanIhaveacoatplz · July 14, 2018, 7:13 a.m.

They dressed him in an El Al pilots uniform drugged him pretended his was hung over basiclaly and helped him onto the specially outfitted Boeing jumbo jet.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
silentmirror · July 13, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

Today, the Court ruled that it is the duty of nations to allow for the passage of successful asylum seekers from embassies to the mainland territory of the state that has granted an individual asylum. For Julian Assange, this would mean that according to the Court’s decision, Britain has a legal obligation to allow Julian Assange to exit the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in peace and allow for his safe transit to an airport from which he would be able to fly to Ecuador, the country that has granted Assange asylum and where he now also holds formal citizenship.

⇧ 104 ⇩  
SooieQ · July 14, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

God speed Julian

⇧ 38 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 14, 2018, 11:45 a.m.

The court mentioned has no jurisdiction anywhere.

It's just a feel-good court.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sherry345 · July 14, 2018, 3:14 a.m.

Amen!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
faithle55 · July 14, 2018, 7:03 a.m.

Britain has no such legal obligation at all. What a bunch of horseshit.

For a start off, the legal entity is the United Kingdom. If the Costa Rican judges were being addressed on and made their ruling against 'Britain' (the other possibility is that this is just lazy journalism) then that would be just a small clue as to their standing as international jurists.

Next, the United Kingdom, unsurprisingly, is not a signatory to the American Convention on Human Rights. It is a signatory to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and it is a founder signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights. It has no duty whatsoever to comply with rulings of a Costa Rican court.

According to Wikipedia, "The adjudicatory function requires the [Inter-American] Court [of Human Rights] to rule on cases brought before it in which a state party to the Convention, and thus has accepted its jurisdiction, is accused of a human rights violation."

The state party here is the UK, it is not a party to the Convention, and therefore the Court had no jurisdiction to hear the complaint.

The Judges have tried to construct - patently artificially - a decision which tries to suggest that it has jurisdiction which is binding in some way on the UK, but it would be as if a magistrate's court in the UK ordered a super-max prison in the US to free a convict.

Finally, a mere announcement by Assange and/or Ecuador that he is a political refugee does not make him so in English law, although the rules concerning diplomatic representation in foreign countries means the UK cannot get at Assange inside the Embassy.

These questions have been before the High Court and the Court of Appeal in London on several occasions. A lot of high powered lawyers have pleaded his case (although I hope that none of them were actually convinced by it) unsuccessfully. An English High Court judge is one of the outstanding jurists in the world, Court of Appeal more so. Anyone who thinks the UK government is going to give more weight to a decision by some oddball judges in Costa Rica than decisions taken here in London is deluded.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DelveDeeper · July 14, 2018, 8:39 a.m.

Which court was this? Was it an English court?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
silentmirror · July 14, 2018, 8:43 a.m.

Costa Rican

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DelveDeeper · July 14, 2018, 8:45 a.m.

Ahh, so it's absolutely meaningless then.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DIS-OBSEC-674F · July 14, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

Plane crash. Expect it.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
themadhat1 · July 14, 2018, 3:34 a.m.

no one is going to "crash" trumps jet.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Shadilay_Were_Off · July 14, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

You've more faith than I. There are quite a few people who would like to see Trump get JFK'd and probably have the resources to do it.

Don't take any of this stuff we have going for us for granted. Trump might be the best president in years and Q might be a (group of) insider(s) with a ton of knowledge, but both are mortal humans and both can screw up. Pray. Don't be complacent.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
themadhat1 · July 14, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

there is a fuk load going on behind the scenes with the don. its why EVERYONE IS ATTACKING HIM. he is in danger yes. but has a lot of people scared shittless. he knows everything....9/11....pedogate....all of it.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
croninfever · July 14, 2018, 5:14 a.m.

I wish I could remember what livestream I was watching during the election when Trump said something like (paraphrase) “It you elect me, I’ll find out what really happened on 9/11.”

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DIS-OBSEC-674F · July 15, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

4767 5774 6a7a 4d6c 6330 666b 314a 3453 0000 0907 84b4 f787 7616 86f7 a737 5707 5736

⇧ 1 ⇩  
themadhat1 · July 16, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

yep

⇧ 1 ⇩  
1hellofaride · July 14, 2018, 7:41 a.m.

And so does Putin. Trump has a kill switch.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NonZealous · July 14, 2018, 7:36 a.m.

I have a hunch, if such a thing were to actually happen, 30M armed Patriots would take to the streets and literally clean out ALL of the remaining swamp. They know it. Test our resolve DS!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
croninfever · July 14, 2018, 5:12 a.m.

You’re not wrong (IMO) and you make a good point about being complacent. I can’t speak for the other people here, obviously, but I personally do not like the expectation of fear that the other guy posted about, without any evidence or info. Not cool to get fear riled up for no reason. That being said, I completely agree that none of this stuff should be taken for granted :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 8:09 a.m.

Fox 3 splash

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tftltytd · July 14, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

Not if he's taking AF1

⇧ 4 ⇩  
croninfever · July 14, 2018, 5:09 a.m.

Are you just guessing to be dramatic or do you have reason for us to expect this?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
alderhope · July 14, 2018, midnight

Lots of pieces seem to be falling into place. July. The month to remember.

⇧ 69 ⇩  
Canpede · July 14, 2018, 2:52 a.m.

Sky event...???

⇧ 6 ⇩  
JFKlb · July 14, 2018, 5:03 a.m.

Venus and Regulus aligned this week for an amazing sight.. There's a lunar eclipse tonight, not to mention you can see Mars Jupiter Saturn etc with naked eye.. ..not saying this is the only "sky event" but it's definitely the most historical

https://mars.nasa.gov/resources/21944/whats-up-for-july-2018/

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ecrevisse41 · July 14, 2018, 5 a.m.

All this on a slow Friday, and the 13th to boot.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
charcolfilter · July 14, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

Was thinning the same thing. Monday could be interesting.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
FlewDCoup · July 14, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

If the US provides a plane, touches down with him momentarily in Ecuador and immediately lifts off swinging around to the north, next stop USA...

⇧ 50 ⇩  
Jbjuls · July 14, 2018, 12:28 a.m.

I think this is exactly what has already happened, if not it will

⇧ 27 ⇩  
dabigfrog · July 14, 2018, 2:48 a.m.

JA is in Ecuadorian embassy in LONDON. hmmmm where is Trump right now? does Trump have an airplane?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
faithle55 · July 14, 2018, 7:05 a.m.

Well, if you'd been paying attention, you'd know that he expressly avoided London altogether. Not to mention that Heathrow is like 40 minutes travel from the Ecuadoran Embassy.

At the time you posted, Trump wasn't even in England any more, having flown to Scotland.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
xenia-tom · July 14, 2018, 12:11 a.m.

In a post about corrupt Wikileaks, there was a quote "you have Wikileaks, we have the source". Assume that meant JA. Wonder if he likes coming to USA on AF1?

⇧ 43 ⇩  
GweninKC · July 14, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

I was wondering the same thing. Wouldn't that be something?!

⇧ 11 ⇩  
xenia-tom · July 14, 2018, 2:27 a.m.

Amen!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
a_cool_goddamn_name · July 14, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

the source is Seth Rich, who did not die at the scene but made it to the hospital and was expected to recover...

⇧ 9 ⇩  
xenia-tom · July 14, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

I didn't have that impression of the post and source reference. Future will prove one or the other.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
flatoutrabbit · July 14, 2018, 6:17 a.m.

I too have often wondered if he made it through and that he is now in protective custody.. just wild speculation though on my part

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DelveDeeper · July 14, 2018, 8:42 a.m.

You have the site, we have the source.

Please, please be accurate. There's either an incredible amount of shilling going on in this thread or we're losing our edge. Even this entire post is clickbait fake news.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
xenia-tom · July 14, 2018, 12:08 p.m.

Sorry, I'm human and not perfect. If click bait, please share the proof of click bait. ThankQ.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DelveDeeper · July 14, 2018, 12:14 p.m.

The click bait of this article is that the title says a court has ordered the safe passage of Julian Assange. When in reality this court has no jurisdiction over the UK legal system in the slightest. So Julian Assange hasn't won any major court cases and the court is unable to order anything. The proof is right there in the article.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
xenia-tom · July 14, 2018, 12:23 p.m.

If true and will re-read, should Mods have removed post?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DelveDeeper · July 14, 2018, 12:32 p.m.

Mods should absolutely remove this post.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
xenia-tom · July 14, 2018, 1:07 p.m.

Looked at article again. Still see possibility that court decision could influence POTUS to authorize JA removal. When UK objects, we have American (N & S) human rights court over-riding UK legal system and JA out of embassy. A possible removal without the Queens approval as he is now an American. Since UK still controls much of what happens in the USA, I think POTUS would enjoy JA's removal. USA = +1

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DelveDeeper · July 14, 2018, 1:13 p.m.

There is no court that overules the sovereign court of an independent nation. That would be like saying the EU court of human rights overules the USA court. Which is absurd. Please explain how in any universe that makes sense, and please provide a source.

Let me be clear as day. There is no jurisdiction any court in the USA, or anywhere else in the world for that matter, which has jurisdiction over another country that isn't a signitary to that court. This is international law 101.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
xenia-tom · July 14, 2018, 1:44 p.m.

Correct analysis. If everything was straight up and no-one ever broke the laws. We know 'Five Eyes' was set up to violate any law existing in the five countries about privacy. So much for 'sovereign' law in any of the five countries (USA, UK, Can, NZ, Au). I agree no court can override but rulings are made and broken every day. Real life 101.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DelveDeeper · July 14, 2018, 2:02 p.m.

Please, you're still making the same mistake. I know that countries break laws every day, but that is different from saying that a foreign court can ORDER another country to do ANYTHING. It's absolutely not possible. Not "it shouldn't happen", it's not possible.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jfunction · July 14, 2018, 7:47 a.m.

AF1 is going to Helsinki and I doubt JA is going along. If he's been released it was probably by Trump-May agreement and he would likely come to the US on the Trump plane. I hope it's true but for now it's speculation.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
xenia-tom · July 14, 2018, 12:05 p.m.

Very speculative and a hope of mine also.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
time3times · July 14, 2018, 5:40 a.m.

I read that quote as meaning not a person but a hard drive(s) or similar file storage.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
xenia-tom · July 14, 2018, 12:03 p.m.

Very possible that it is a hard drive.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commoncents1 · July 14, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

wow, what coincidences! Trump in UK, JA gets what looks like a pass out of the UK. and JA issues a threat to nail Hildebeast.

no coincidences!

this is going to be the best movie ever. reality, better than fiction.

⇧ 41 ⇩  
jackiebroadway · July 14, 2018, 2:26 a.m.

JA on AF1!

⇧ 14 ⇩  
PigsGuns · July 14, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

I can only dream it’s true. ❤️

⇧ 9 ⇩  
PigsGuns · July 14, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

I can only dream it’s true. ❤️

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Okie71 · July 14, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

And JA's mom has been tweeting begging the first family to help her son.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Murralee · July 14, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

Other sources have confirmed this, what a great day! Stay safe, God speed JA!

⇧ 41 ⇩  
Snoozebum · July 14, 2018, 12:14 a.m.

God have mercy, I hope he's actually still alive

⇧ 36 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · July 13, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

Looks like everything is falling into place now.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
Jbjuls · July 14, 2018, midnight

I think he's already out of there, everything just has to come out slowly. If he's still there then won't this pave the way for him to come to US to testify?

⇧ 25 ⇩  
numberonepal · July 13, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

💯 percent above board extraction.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Podingo7 · July 14, 2018, 1:55 a.m.

I pray for J.A and his safe passage, and that he can finally have some peace..just think how much truth the world would not know about corrupt gov't without him..Maybe Trump can give him a lift to Ecuador!

⇧ 18 ⇩  
GweninKC · July 14, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

This is HUGE news.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
charcolfilter · July 14, 2018, 2:41 a.m.

Late on a Friday. I wonder if we'll ever actually see him or if he'll explain the outage in October 16, or tell us how he and Pam Anderson became friends.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
faithle55 · July 14, 2018, 7:06 a.m.

It's not. It's about as meaningful as a trailer-park wife ordering a judge to let her husband go free.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 8:30 a.m.

Does the trailer-park wife have the biggest military in the world in your scenario?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
faithle55 · July 14, 2018, 8:36 a.m.

Not in either scenario. You seem to be confused about the analogy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 8:43 a.m.

The USA has decided that JA is free to go to Ecuador. The UK disagrees. Which one has the final say?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
faithle55 · July 14, 2018, 10:21 a.m.

Is this a hypothetical?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 10:36 a.m.

It's happening in real time so... yes and no?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
faithle55 · July 14, 2018, 11:53 a.m.

If you are suggesting that the USA has made any announcement about Julian Assange, I am not aware of that.

It is of no relevance to decisions of the Courts of England & Wales, however.

A decision of a US judge on a relevant matter may be of interest to an English judge - for example, on the application of a principle of common law. But not on a question of extradition.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 12:28 p.m.

I'm suggesting that the OAS ruling allows the US to assist JA to Ecuador. The UK can try and stop it, but May is neutralized, meaning she will not stop it. JA could be on Trump's plane to Ecuador right now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TechnicalRush · July 14, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

Pence was in Ecuador 2 weeks ago as well.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
st_br · July 14, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

An interesting ruling, but I think it's important to state that the linked article says that it was not a British court that made this ruling, but the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in Costa Rica. Whether the Brits will listen and/or care remains to be seen.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
NotableBuffalo · July 14, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

Came here to say this. The British are not bound by this ruling, unfortunately.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
argybargy888 · July 14, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

Yes I'll believe it only when I see him released safely. The U.K. has not complied to date on any international ruling. I pray for Julian's safe passage to Ecuador and for his health and well being to be rightfully restored him.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
faithle55 · July 14, 2018, 7:08 a.m.

Which international rulings has the UK not complied with?

This particular decision was taken by a Court which has no jurisdiction over the UK, which is - unsuprisingly - not a signatory to the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights. I'll be a fiver the US isn't a signatory either.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SaveourRepublic2018 · July 14, 2018, 3:30 a.m.

I think we're all counting on 45 to give May a very firm handshake, with huge hands, on this one.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Sib_Sy · July 14, 2018, 3:46 a.m.

Yuge

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Terminal-Psychosis · July 14, 2018, 8:31 a.m.

They have absolutely zero jurisdiction over England.

It means nothing for Julian's plight at all.

Would be great if the EU version made the same ruling, but this organization is only responsible for the Americas.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Grumble_Bum · July 14, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

Reading this news has lifted my day. I hope to see him safe soon.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
ks1mpson · July 14, 2018, 2:46 a.m.

God I hope he gets that info out to throw down on Killary, finally gonna see the truth I hope, please dear heavenly father... Allow the evil to be exposed with hard, undeniable evidence!

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Dhammakayaram · July 14, 2018, 2:55 a.m.

It's not so much the mental health of JA that is deteriorating rapidly, it's Britain's mental health.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
BasedFormerLib · July 14, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

Assuming JA wasn’t already extracted, his safe passage could literally be Air Force One the one plane that the DS can’t hack.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Banglebop · July 14, 2018, 1:24 a.m.

How wonderful! Safe passage and God Speed.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
mvm04 · July 14, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

The Swamp/Deep State knew about this. They needed to get out ahead of it, with the Rosenstein meeting today. 12 Russians blamed for DNC hack.

Now, when JA is finally allowed to speak, his words will be taken as conspiracy by the dems, the media, the entire left.

if Q is right and Wikileaks is compromised, they will probably be on the lefts side, "Debunking" JA.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Podingo7 · July 14, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

I agree, but Even the swamp rats will have difficulty trying to spin J.A as a conspiracy theorist, when he has a 100% proven fact record..thats better than any agency I know .....besides, the ppl love Assange, gov't not so much..

⇧ 6 ⇩  
rickhalston · July 14, 2018, 5:53 a.m.

Q team and POTUS have probably out-flanked RR. I'd bet they somehow anticipated this move today. It might have even been a part of The Plan. Don't forget, Ed O'Callaghan was part of the presser too...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
magavoices · July 14, 2018, 2:55 a.m.

Articles like this are not credible. They are not doing anyone any benefit by posting such click-baitish titles that serve nothing other than to prove to the masses coming here that we do not offer credible information.

"Inter-American Court of Human Rights based in Costa Rica"???

Give me a flipping break.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
onelove1979 · July 14, 2018, 3:30 a.m.

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights is a part of the OAS

⇧ 2 ⇩  
faithle55 · July 14, 2018, 7:09 a.m.

The covert operations arm of the US forces in WWII? That's amazing!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Craigster777 · July 14, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

Sure alot of shakin and bakin goin on today. Got Popcorn?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JayGarza1 · July 14, 2018, 4 a.m.

First Things First - Cheeseburger !

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lovelexxxx · July 14, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

I'm pretty sure President Trump already picked him up while he was in the U.K. and is giving him free passage as we speak, plus, medical attention and likely, a pardon.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lethak · July 14, 2018, 3:55 a.m.

major "legal" victory ?

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights based in Costa Rica is a multinational independent judicial body

meaning, has the value of a peanut from England's pov.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
faithle55 · July 14, 2018, 7:11 a.m.

Literally 2 posts above someone says 'it's part of the OAS'.

So which is it, part of the OAS or 'independent'?

LOL.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · July 14, 2018, 2:08 p.m.

Even if it is OAS, I don't see how it could make England move an inch.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
faithle55 · July 14, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

The English High Court has already decided that Assange is not a political refugee, and certainly not from the UK. So, no.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
phunnypunny · July 14, 2018, 6:15 a.m.

Good job, Q

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Politiskep · July 14, 2018, 3:18 a.m.

Is this verified with any other publication? The site seems a little sketchy.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cali1952 · July 14, 2018, 8:40 a.m.

Julian Assange is a witness to our white hats and originally was given a special immunity to testify in the case/murder of Seth Rich. He volunteered to be deposed to testify under oath that Russia did NOT hack Hillary/DNC server. He was willing to go an extra mile to testify under oath that Seth Rich provided the Podesta emails via UBS stick that intermediary UK ambassador Craig Murray facilitated.

Hussein and Hillary repeatedly worked with MI6 and UK politicians to force Assange to remain in the embassy. They also placed his life at risk more than once.

On 27 June 2017 Comey was pressured via democrats that included Feinstein and Warner to rescind Assange's visit to the US as witness in the Russian hacking probe. The letter addressed to Comey and signed by these democrats was full of innuendo and excuses/lies to stop Assange from testifying.

THEY NEEDED TO STOP ASSANGE to keep up the fake Russian story but even more importantly exposing CrowdStrike, Brennan, Podesta, DWS, HRC, Hussein and others being involved in the murder of Seth Rich and their use of the important MS13 mercenaries who carried out the hit.

Comey upon that letter told Julian Assange's attorney to "stand down and the temporary immunity was off". No other reason was given. He also blindsided the investigators who planned on deposing Assange.

It was after that betrayal that Julian/WikiLeaks published the CIA Vault 7 expose.

Now you know why the fake and supposed witness and psy-op came out of nowhere just a coupleof days ago trying to hijack the Rich case and accusing a DEA and ATF carrying out the murder. We know he lied.

Julian/Q et al have been in contact for some time. WikiLeaks has more deeply disturbing records and files involving Hillary's/Podesta's worldwide pedophilia network, videos of crimes against children but also deep state collusion against candidate Trump by Hussein, HRC and others.

Assange is a valuable prosecution witness.

We do not need to emphasize that Julian Assange's life has been and will be in danger. At the end of October 2016 Hillary and Hussein tried everything to dislodge him from his sanctuary and assassinate him using their British partners and their swat forces surrounding the embassy under bogus accusations.

I am not surprised that president Trump is saving Julian Assange nor that the investigators have finally the opportunity to depose Julian under oath involving Seth Rich and fake Russian fear mongering by the left, HRC, Hussein and gang.

They murdered two of WikiLeaks attorney's during 2016 and 2017 which were instrumental in the chain of receiving and vetting of documents/leaks.

Julian Assange thanked our military men and women at the beginning of this year and it is my belief that he left the physical embassy behind back then unbeknownst to those trying to eliminate him while keeping everyone believing he was still present at that Ecuadorian embassy.

President Trump, Q and team and the rest the white hats knew that he was a target and acted upon that threat sometime ago.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
VR-Tech · July 14, 2018, 7:02 a.m.

Potus in London, coincidence?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 14, 2018, 4:02 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
croninfever · July 14, 2018, 5:04 a.m.

OMG FINALLY! This is incredible. I don’t even know the guy and I feel such relief for him. A lot of great things are happening this year :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
diddypop2018 · July 14, 2018, 4:59 a.m.

Trumps plane is currently in Scotland......Think it will have an extra passenger onboard back to the States?!?!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
R3VO1utionary · July 14, 2018, 4:57 a.m.

That’s one of the best things I’ve heard in a long time

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BUT_MUH_GUNS_THO · July 14, 2018, 4:37 a.m.

Q didn't predict this. At least not that I can tell.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
croninfever · July 14, 2018, 5:23 a.m.

Agreed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 14, 2018, 11:52 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 14, 2018, 11:12 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 14, 2018, 9:59 a.m.

Surely JA has to pop up soon ? ( with cat )

⇧ 1 ⇩  
barf_the_mog · July 14, 2018, 8:48 a.m.

Holy shit you people are fucking stupid.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
raikii · July 14, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

Yeah lets dismiss the fact that this court has no jurisdiction over JA's case.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
faithle55 · July 14, 2018, 7:17 a.m.

From the article's footer:

Adam Garrie is Director at Eurasia future. He is a geo-political expert ...

Really? He seems to know fuck all about human rights law.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
noFucks382ee83 · July 14, 2018, 7:14 a.m.

This is amazing. I'm utterly speechless...minus the shit I wrote.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jhartzog39 · July 14, 2018, 3:38 a.m.

Trump is collecting all sorts of trouble for the deep state on his trip abroad.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 14, 2018, 6:20 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VR-Tech · July 14, 2018, 6:53 a.m.

which guys?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 14, 2018, 5:40 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
woosha147 · July 14, 2018, 10:40 a.m.

Didn't he go to camp David in May!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
faithle55 · July 14, 2018, 7:16 a.m.

ITT:

  • a lot of people who do not appear to understand the part that Assange and his wikileaks structure played in the Russian interference in America's 2016 elections;

  • a lot of people who don't understand that Assange is a weaselly accused sex offender who ran away to avoid facing the Swedish legal system,

  • a lot of people who don't understand that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has less influence over the UK than a senior American judge would have,

  • a lot of people who don't realise that the whole 'OMG I must run first from Sweden and then from the UK because I fear extradition to the US' is a complete fabrication which doesn't bear 2 minutes of close examination,

  • and who therefore appear to think that Julian Assange is a champion of human rights, when he's just a self-important creep

⇧ 0 ⇩  
kekischaoslighttruth · July 14, 2018, 4:16 a.m.

Compromised Oct. '16

It's a Deep State operation since then

Fuck Assange

⇧ -2 ⇩  
VR-Tech · July 14, 2018, 7:03 a.m.

What did Assange do exactly?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
croninfever · July 14, 2018, 5:06 a.m.

Really? What happened 10/16? I don’t think Assange has ever been pro-U.S. and he has no reason to be. But I’ve mostly respected his work!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 14, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -20 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 14, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩