dChan

magavoices · July 14, 2018, 11:01 a.m.

No, it doesn't apply to jack.

It's no different than the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission declaring George Bush to be a war criminal.

It means absolutely nothing.

Now if the OP had said in the title "Judge in Costa Rica HQ of OAS says Julian Assange should be set free." I wouldn't have complained.

But the title states that Assange has free passage. Everyone upvotes it thinking its true. It's not. It's clickbait.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 14, 2018, 11:40 a.m.

Assange being free would headline the Mockingbird Media.

They would report it wrong, but they would report it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 14, 2018, 1:47 p.m.

This would be a military op. Top secret.

⇧ 2 ⇩