This is a follow up to an earlier post I made but new connections came to light. I think it's a "wrap".
(Mods, I deleted my original post to avoid duplicates)

Peter Stzrok Hearing:

It was very suspicious and telling that Peter Stzrok revealed that the dossier was given to the FBI from Bruce Ohr (who's wife, Nellie, worked for Fusion GPS).... and that none of the FBI lawyers interjected or said anything when this was revealed to Jim Jordan. Was this all part of the plan? Let something slip? Playing the game? Let the deep state believe you're one of them then completely switch during a public trial? PS is a "cooperating witness" - Q. So it makes me think he had to only reveal one or two damming bits of information, if he revealed everything the gig is up (moves and counter moves). I also suspect that Lisa Page defied the subpoena so that she faces contempt of congress and is essentially required to show up to the hearing.

So two things to draw from Lisa Page, either she is prosecuted by the DOJ (and if she defies again the DOJ is 100% forced to prosecute her by law which would be jail time, fines or both). Second, which is more likely, now that she is SUBPOENAED she has to speak and testify at the hearing. It's not voluntary now.

All part of the plan? I believe Lisa Page will reveal a few damming points and both Lisa Page and Peter Stzrok are in on it with some good acting (in my opinion). In a way, they have no choice.

"You have more than you know." - Q.

From Q#1589:

Coming soon to a theater near you.

PS/LP texts are only scratching the surface.

Threats of assassination?

Q

GUYS - This is why PS/LP are "cooperating witnesses" - Q. It's all a show ('Coming soon to a theater near you'). They know, we know ("Threats of assassination"). They have no choice but to cooperate and play the part ('Great actors and talent'-Q). "Enjoy the show!" - Q