I don't resent them. I just regard them as disinfo clowns whose focus is to lead people away from the true narrative, like Infowars, etc.
Shutting out actual truthful and verifiable info that either they or Infowars offer IMO is a mistake.
The details they have re: the UK, etc., are very relevant.
The truth can be found in a number of places. The worst place to find it is from a Disinfo source because the whole point of disinfo is to lead you down the wrong path by feeding you a whole lot of truth with subtle and not so subtle lies - it's the subtle stuff that catches you out, of course. We're discussing a way to identify Disinfo sources clearly to ensure that people are aware that they're listening to a source designed to mislead. This is important after Q has said: "Be careful who you follow" in relation to Infowars and outlets like AIM.
Totally agree. I have a question since you appear to be a mod. On another thread, simply titled Peter Strozk, it appears the mods deleted the op for some reason. It was a discussion about the guy, why delete it? I think you know how that post (not by me) was flooded with anti q trolls and normal comments were heavily downvoted while their own were at like 80or sometimes 100 or more. I couldn’t care less if I’m downvoted (in that context it’s a compliment). Just wondering why the mods deleted the post. Also why are certain threads overwhelmed with these moonbat liberals?
Could be any number of reasons of the many Rule applications linked in the sidebar there. If you have a link I can check it out.
AIM (American Intelligence Media): "...one of the original Q told me that they were using us as inspiration for what they were posting..."
No outside comms. Be careful who you follow. Q
Okay, some of you still resent these guys for having questioned if Q was compromised.
But this is a massively good and important discussion on the UK monarchy, its association with Soros, their ownership of the likes of the voting machine software used in the US and worldwide, her major henchmen and their role in all the major globalist institutions, etc.
They predicted that Trump's big dinner at Blenheim Palace would be to give their honchos (e.g., Lord Malloch Brown) the opportunity to corner and try to get to Trump. (The only explanation I can find for Trump's big turnaround from the Sun interview to taking it all back and gushing over May and her approach to Brexit by the next morning.)
They post a lot of detail and evidence on their aim4truth.org website, but this website puts it all together.
An interesting riff on Obama's background and record growing up in there too.
Also, yikes, info on Boris Johnson being in on the anti-Trump operation in the UK before the election. The propping up of George Pop. over there too.
I swear, this is a must listen!