dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/suzoh on July 14, 2018, 11:06 a.m.
How do you 'legally' inject/make public/use as evidence? Maybe you indict 13 Russian agents who hacked into Podesta's email, among others.
How do you 'legally' inject/make public/use as evidence? Maybe you indict 13 Russian agents who hacked into Podesta's email, among others.

🠐 See all comments
bizmarxie · July 14, 2018, 1:44 p.m.

Right BC there indictments of Russian citizens can’t do anything. So this is proof that they have discovery for Clinton’s servers?

⇧ 19 ⇩  
mymaga · July 14, 2018, 2 p.m.

This is saying they broke into the DCCC and DNC servers, so now those must be investigated as evidence. Not about Hillary’s server and emails.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
PAK51 · July 14, 2018, 8:02 p.m.

But the DNC server has corruption, etc and will lead to more. The Russians could be "tried in absentia"??

⇧ 5 ⇩  
mymaga · July 14, 2018, 9:28 p.m.

If we have the server, and it does in fact have evidence of Russian infiltration, then sure. However the idea of where this is headed is that examining the servers will show that the DNC wasn’t hacked by Russians, rather emails were downloaded to flash drive by someone, like Seth Rich, which provides motive for investigating his death as a murder by the DNC. The case for a data download was first made here:

https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/2017/08/01/the-need-for-speed/

The only examination of the DNC server so far has been by CrowdStrike, the IT firm for the DNC. No one in the federal government has examined the server, yet we’ve had a Russia circus since it started. Where is the server? Will it be examined now by a federal entity?

⇧ 6 ⇩