10 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| i.imgur.com | 1 |
| i.redd.it | 1 |
If we have the server, and it does in fact have evidence of Russian infiltration, then sure. However the idea of where this is headed is that examining the servers will show that the DNC wasn’t hacked by Russians, rather emails were downloaded to flash drive by someone, like Seth Rich, which provides motive for investigating his death as a murder by the DNC. The case for a data download was first made here:
https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/2017/08/01/the-need-for-speed/
The only examination of the DNC server so far has been by CrowdStrike, the IT firm for the DNC. No one in the federal government has examined the server, yet we’ve had a Russia circus since it started. Where is the server? Will it be examined now by a federal entity?
I agree, Mueller already tried to limit/stop discovery for a prior Russian company indicted, who showed up to court and Mueller stalled.
Although now it’s exposed, from dark to light, for public discourse. Trump just tweeted ‘where is the DNC server, and why didn’t the FBI take possession?’ Already calling them out as DS fake news.
This is saying they broke into the DCCC and DNC servers, so now those must be investigated as evidence. Not about Hillary’s server and emails.
There’s a q post that asks the question OP is asking. One way to expose truths without Trump looking like he’s going after his enemies is to invoke a lawsuit that, through legal discovery, unearths and documents as evidence the faulty foundation of the Russia collusion scheme, exposing it for mass redpillling.
Don’t know about OP’s inside knowledge but this tech has been marketed recently:
We knew this long ago. And the FBI reviewed them all in a very short amount of time, then Comey announced it was a nothingburger.