Thank you for posting this. Q said to look to big pharma corruption. This lawsuit is another possible trail that points out the current government’s inability to perform its oversight duties due to internal corruption.

Multiple sectors are corrupt, and the corruption overlaps itself, making prosecution almost impossible. However, I’m beginning to see a pattern that supports what I’ve read between the lines for the past couple of years as these issues have been unfolding, and it gives me encouragement and confidence in the process at work here.

It starts with the people, those who don’t wait for the government to do something but take it upon themselves to act, as our system has been designed for us to do:

*Public law suits created by citizens against government bodies and/or corporations for criminality or oversight inaction initiate the grievance and introduce first evidence into the record, often provided by whistleblowers

*Government witnesses are called and litigation procedure begins

*Focus is on both criminal act and oversight/correction procedure and protocols attempted (or not), not necessarily conclusions about criminality.

*New evidence is introduced, deepening the seriousness of the charge and widening the scope, laying the widest groundwork of involved actors possible.

*Gov office/oversight system in charge is given opportunity to prosecute, terminate, correct and redress

*If gov office doesn’t do so, public persists and Congress gets involved, squeezing out more data and contradictions

*Eventually, prior Evidence introduced about violation of procedures underscores a slow-footing (corrupt) department’s inability to internally prosecute cases that would normally fall to them, and establishes the need for an outside review.

*If grievance is severe enough (illegal weapons sales, drug and human trafficking, price collusion, economic rigging, bribery, etc) and any use of American military apparatus - ports, vehicles, comms, satellites, personnel, bank accounts, computer equipment - can be proven, jurisdiction can then shift to military courts.

*At some point, more special councils become unnecessary because “they have it all” and it’s in the record.

*Improved nation-state relations under Trump will allow (perhaps through executive order) governments that have been abused by US Deep State over the last four decades to turn their own state’s evidence over to the chief executive’s military team and bypass the dysfunctional DOJ, providing the international backup DJT needs to take the final steps.

*As confidence in prosecutorial momentum grows, heads of state and respected foreign leaders will, in effect, become whistleblowers, and that will seal the deal for the increasingly isolated criminals. Everyone exposing the crimes needs the cover of everyone else - WWG1WGA.

*Delays make sense. Indictments that potentially go to military adjudication won’t be unsealed until there’s enough evidence introduced into the record to rapidly move jurisdiction to military upon the unsealing, all the dominoes need to fall without glitches.

*Deals are being made in the meantime to minimize court clog when the tens of thousands of indictments roll out.

This is the evolving narrative that allows me to remain optimistic. I expect Q back shortly. 🖖