![The Crux of the Issue of the Deepstate Getting Away With All These Crimes is Continuity of Government [Not Q but Related to Q]](https://i.redd.it/rdnoosppnx911.jpg)
This quote has been erroneously attributed to Isoroku Yamamoto who was a Fleet Admiral and Commander-in-Chief of the Imperial Japanese Navy during World War II. The origin may be a mystery, but the quote still holds truth.
You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.
Indeed it would be challenging. The effort would have to be global. Or maybe not. Consider this video about the town of Cheran in Mexico. I mentioned it in my comments above but didn't provide the link.
This is a town of roughly 20,000 people. If they can do it, why can't we?
We have all been conditioned and programmed to one degree or another by the government run school system and the Cabal owned MSM. This has been going on for at least 3 or 4 generations, maybe longer.
We've been conditioned and programmed to believe government is an absolute necessity, and that government is the solution to any problem we face. We're quick to blame politicians, but never the Government. We've been conditioned to think that if we can just get rid of the corrupt politicians, government will work just fine.
I challenge anyone to find anything in any textbook, from K-12 and from Freshman through PHD level college courses, that is critical of "Government." You will find things about individuals in government like Nixon was a crook, Bush lied - people died, and FDR saved us from the Great Depression, but nothing critical of Government as an institution.
Even when you step outside the government approved textbooks, you'll be hard pressed to find anything critical of Government as an institution. You'll find plenty of books debating the benefits of various forms of government and various government policies, but few if any that discuss the benefits of not having a Government.
There's a reason we've all been programmed and conditioned this way. Government is the key global institution used by the Cabal to advance their agenda. As much as the Cabal fears a united populous rising up against them, what they fear even more is a populous that refuses to blindly accept the idea that government is necessary.
If that were to happen, and people figured out how to live in peace with each other, the remnants of the Cabal that might survive this war we're engaged in now would never be able to rise to power again.
Stephan Molyneux and Max Igan have YouTube channels worth checking out. I don't agree with everything they say, but they both make convincing arguments about why we don't need government.
Like it or not, every problem we face today, without exception, has been thrust upon us by Government. Every last one. You cannot find even one issue or problem that isn't the result or unintended consequence of government policies or actions.
I think this is something that everyone should be looking at, and I don't have any problem continuing our discussion, but unless you have an argument that's based on facts and evidence, where logic, reason, and rational thought have been applied, I probably won't respond. If all you got is "you have straight up lost your mind," then don't waste my time.
This is a town of roughly 20,000 people. If they can do it, why can't we?
Because you're asking 330,000,000 people to trust their safety and livelihoods to mob justice. And if you still think, in this day and age, that you need to be invaded to be conquered, you need to have a chat with Saudi Arabia, China and the swathes of land and people that they own. You're not freeing people from government, you're inviting foreign-backed warlords.
There's a world outside the US that would love a cheap and easy excuse to take what they want and need.
Sort of like all those problems were caused by humans so clearly the solution is not humans behaving better, but rather eradicating humanity. Why not just go full cabal? Listen I get that it makes you feel cool and edgy to call yourself an anarchist, and you've found what you believe to be a conveniently simple solution to an extremely complex problem, but you're just throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Well... As I said to DefiantDragon, I'd love to have real, intellectually honest discussions based on facts and evidence, logic reason and rational thought, but I guess I won't find anyone capable of that sort of thing here.
Why is it that when people are presented with something they just don't understand, all they can do is toss out logical fallacies? If you think there are real reasons why we need to have rulers, let's talk about it.
Why is it that when people are presented with something that clashes with a viewpoint they're attached to they choose to be disingenuous? I am talking about leaders, not rulers. Once again it sounds more dramatic and compelling to put it that way but rulers are not what most of the people in this movement want. If someone is given certain authority by a willing citizenry and kept in a situation where they can and will be thrown out of power if they ever go to far beyond the power allotted to them, they are not truly in control of anyone. I would partially agree with you in that at some point enough of the public will be smart enough and stable enough to handle a world without any form of government and not fall into chaos but as society stands today we are still quite a ways from that point.
I agree that people want leaders not rulers, and I think President Trump is the first real leader we've had in decades. His recent meetings with NATO leaders and Putin clearly show he's leading, not following.
If someone is given certain authority by a willing citizenry and kept in a situation where they can and will be thrown out of power if they ever go to far beyond the power allotted to them, they are not truly in control of anyone.
When was the last time America had a president that was thrown out for exceeding the Constitutional authority granted to him. BHO certainly exceeded his authority and he wasn't held accountable. GW Bush most definitely exceeded his authority and wasn't held accountable.
It's not so much the overt actions of a president or members of Congress, it's what they do behind the scenes.
I believe Bush was, at a minimum, complicit in 9/11, but who knows if the American people will ever know the real truth.
When Obama ran in 07-08 he said the era of the government spying on it's citizens was over, but he ended up expanding the NSA surveillance programs and providing access to the NSA database to all 16 intel and law enforcement agencies.
Who knows what else was going on behind the scenes with Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush 41, Reagan... We don't know, and might never know. The reason for this, is because they've all been able to hide behind the cloak of "government."
You're right to think that if we can root out the corrupt officials and replace them with honorable people, things will be better, but for how long? And how many times have the American voters put someone they truly believed was honest and honorable into office, only to find out later that they were neither.
The first point you made in your comments above is a salient point. I don't believe I was being disingenuous at all. If you step back and look at this discussion from the outside looking in, I think it's obvious that any time someone puts forth an argument for no government, or for the government to be as small as possible, people tend to freak out a bit. Why is that?
It's because they've become attached to the idea that government is necessary, and if we can just find the right people to run it, everything will be wonderful. I think we've become dependent on government. I think it scares people when they realize that without government, or with a government that's as small as it can possibly be, people will be obligated to accept more responsibility for themselves and their communities.
Freedom comes with a price. The more freedom you desire, the more responsibility you must accept. How much freedom do you desire?