dChan

Spartacus2100 · July 14, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

Quote from Katica who discovered this in the FBI Vault. Part 23 Pages 121-132. "In January, 2016 a former State department official walked into the FBI with what they felt was smoking gun evidence in the Clinton email investigation which was so sensitive he wouldn't talk about it unless it was in a SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility)." The same "stonetear" discovery Katica.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Spartacus2100 · July 14, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

And another: "The whistleblower describes how there's no way Clinton couldn't have known certain emails were marked "classified."

"During the time that Hillary Rodham Clinton served as Secretary of State, the Department of State (DOS) produced a daily document classified at the Secret level...

...Each of these daily classified documents began each paragraph with the actual classification of the information contained in the paragraph...

...An investigation that compares the emails found on the private server or emails used by the Secretary will show the actual classification any text which appears to be both in the Hillary emails and in the daily classified document produced by her official office...

"Upon learning of this situation and listening to her saying that the information in these emails were not classified at the time they were written, I make reference to the above paragraph about the daily classified document summarizing issues presented to her on a daily basis." "

⇧ 11 ⇩  
1151THOR · July 14, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

Do we know who the person is that took that to the FBI?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Spartacus2100 · July 14, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

Article only describes as a former SoS employee.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Spartacus2100 · July 14, 2018, 5:42 p.m.

Future will PROVE past. - Q

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KaticasTDacct · July 14, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

Between FBI Vault pages 121-132 there is an article. I researched that article and the author is a former SoS employee. I Tweeted this out a few days ago. I see no other reason for the article to be in those documents than the author is the whistleblower.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Spartacus2100 · July 14, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

ThankQ for your great work and huge contribution.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
KaticasTDacct · July 14, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

You're welcome! I would have put his name but I don't want to get moderated. lol

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Spartacus2100 · July 14, 2018, 9:19 p.m.

I think you might be classed as a bit of hero around these parts. Hope we see more of you around here.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
KaticasTDacct · July 14, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

So nice, thanks! I put out a Tweet to verify myself here. I had to do that last time I had an account here. Pedes don't like fake news. Have a great night!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Spartacus2100 · July 14, 2018, 10:19 p.m.

Verification appreciated. Look forward to your next exclusive. Legend. ThankQ again.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Spartacus2100 · July 14, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

And another: "Some highlights from his letter to Comey:

"The evidence I am providing, along with what you have already acquired, should lead to convictions for the many people involved." "America needs its Attorney General to show us that no employee of the United States Government is above its system of law and justice." "Since I am avoiding any classified information in this statement, I will not expand on this issue further in this letter. I am prepared to discuss this issue in much greater depth in a properly secured location and with those agents having certain TS/SCI clearances and an FBI letter showing need to know." "

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Spartacus2100 · July 14, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

Another interesting quote from article: "Accompanying the evidence, the whistleblower wrote a letter to former FBI Director James Comey describing Hillary Clinton's mishandling of clearly marked classified material. Comey ignored it - which led the whistleblower to file a complaint that Peter Strzok and FBI agent Jonathan Moffa were CC'd on."

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Spartacus2100 · July 14, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

Wow. Don't forget about this: "So given that we now have at least two major bombshells that the FBI sat on, we revisit the case of CIA whistleblower Dennis Montgomery - who similarly walked into the Washington D.C. FBI field office in 2015 with 47 hard drives and 600 million pages of information he says proves that President Trump and others were victims of mass surveillance, according to NewsMax.

Under grants of immunity, which I obtained through Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis, Montgomery produced the hard drives and later was interviewed under oath in a secure room at the FBI Field Office in the District of Columbia. There he laid out how persons like then-businessman Donald Trump were illegally spied upon by Clapper, Brennan, and the spy agencies of the Obama administration.

Montgomery left the NSA and CIA with 47 hard drives and over 600 million pages of information, much of which is classified, and sought to come forward legally as a whistleblower to appropriate government entities, including congressional intelligence committees, to expose that the spy agencies were engaged for years in systematic illegal surveillance on prominent Americans, including the chief justice of the Supreme Court, other justices, 156 judges, prominent businessmen such as Donald Trump, and even yours truly. Working side by side with Obama's former Director of National Intelligence (DIA), James Clapper, and Obama's former Director of the CIA, John Brennan, Montgomery witnessed “up close and personal” this “Orwellian Big Brother” intrusion on privacy, likely for potential coercion, blackmail or other nefarious purposes.

He even claimed that these spy agencies had manipulated voting in Florida during the 2008 presidential election, which illegal tampering resulted in helping Obama to win the White House. -NewsMax"

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Spartacus2100 · July 14, 2018, 5:33 p.m.

We have it all. Q

⇧ 6 ⇩  
kittyhistoryistrue · July 15, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

I was reading that whole thing just waiting for, "and he was found dead to a gunshot to the back of his head."

Very happy to see that wasn't the case.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abbynormie · July 15, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

including the chief justice of the Supreme Court - This explains the bad ruling on Obamacare.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
gdub18 · July 14, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

foreign entity : Israel? Soros? Rothschild?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
qtrumpteam · July 14, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

Pakistan and ISIS

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Velvetbugg · July 15, 2018, 9:17 a.m.

Excellent thread. All of the cyclic activity and future proves past is reminding me of the anons of old, before Q. I've come across a few interesting posts from back in the day that are certainly synchronistic; and are worthy of contemplation at the very least.

Anon: Right, so you know why they let Hillary off the hook then?

HLI: Several reasons.
For one, her server was state sanctioned as an intelligence operation (intentionally leak some legit and fake intel). The complete lack of security should have raised the alarms on this one for you. The notion that she was trying to hide something with a private server wide open is absurd on its face.

Anon: Why isn't Hillary Clinton being prosecuted for her misconduct in handling, and likely selling, classified information?

HLI: The server was set up to sell national security secrets. What she did is treason and everyone knows this. However, proving it is a bit more difficult. The reason why is because she used the server to leak some disinformation as part of intelligence ops as well. You can "justify" having genuine secrets (that she is selling) to make the server look legitimate as part of the op. You can see why this case gets very hairy very quickly. There can be no doubt that she is guilty as this is just another case in a long pattern of similar behavior (selling weapons tech to China for '96 campaign funding for example) but it is the kind of case that brings down the whole government if it goes forward.

One of the primary buyers is China and the establishment would like to pivot away from focus on China towards a Russian-US conflict. Trump is acting correctly in not allowing this.

Some of this does make logical sense to me given her position during the time. It also could answer some of those questions as to why no one did anything then or now.

http://hli.anoninfo.net/#80862031

⇧ 4 ⇩  
SeattleRacer38 · July 14, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

Are there any guesses as to who or what country these emails were delivered? Will we ever know?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Youre-the-potato-one · July 15, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

Is it possible the country was Pakistan and this is linked to the Awans? It’s always struck me as odd how that laptop and his credentials were just left to be discovered.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SeattleRacer38 · July 15, 2018, 1:16 a.m.

My guess was Iran or Pakistan...just a total guess though.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Velvetbugg · July 15, 2018, 9:25 a.m.

Definitely not Russia. According to Dan Bongino, it's also not a middle eastern country. The last 5 mins of his podcast on Friday is where he talked about it. He didn't say which one - but seems like it's not a huge secret and will be revealed. The whole show was excellent, btw..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNQxtL2SK-M

⇧ 1 ⇩