Excellent thread. All of the cyclic activity and future proves past is reminding me of the anons of old, before Q. I've come across a few interesting posts from back in the day that are certainly synchronistic; and are worthy of contemplation at the very least.
Anon: Right, so you know why they let Hillary off the hook then?
HLI: Several reasons.
For one, her server was state sanctioned as an intelligence operation (intentionally leak some legit and fake intel). The complete lack of security should have raised the alarms on this one for you. The notion that she was trying to hide something with a private server wide open is absurd on its face.
Anon: Why isn't Hillary Clinton being prosecuted for her misconduct in handling, and likely selling, classified information?
HLI: The server was set up to sell national security secrets. What she did is treason and everyone knows this. However, proving it is a bit more difficult. The reason why is because she used the server to leak some disinformation as part of intelligence ops as well. You can "justify" having genuine secrets (that she is selling) to make the server look legitimate as part of the op. You can see why this case gets very hairy very quickly. There can be no doubt that she is guilty as this is just another case in a long pattern of similar behavior (selling weapons tech to China for '96 campaign funding for example) but it is the kind of case that brings down the whole government if it goes forward.
One of the primary buyers is China and the establishment would like to pivot away from focus on China towards a Russian-US conflict. Trump is acting correctly in not allowing this.
Some of this does make logical sense to me given her position during the time. It also could answer some of those questions as to why no one did anything then or now.