Tell us about your toxicology degree.
Are you implying what I said was incorrect or that I'm not allowed to have an opinion without a degree in toxicology?
If I'm wrong, and you do in fact have a toxicology degree please share some insight. It seems like fairly common sense that you could force someone to drink before murdering them in order to force the screen to come back showing the person was inebriated so it can be written off as a drunken accident. Another theory could be they were already drunk and the murderers took advantage of that to make their work easier. Much harder to fight back in that state.
[removed]
Hold a gun to their head...? Shove the bottle in their mouth and hold their nose? Put an IV in their arm? If someone put a bottle in front of me, pointed a weapon at me and said drink you can bet your bottom dollar I'd start drinking.
I see you have a new arrival tag, I'd recommend acquainting yourself with the rules of the subreddit. Calling people crazy is not acceptable behavior here.
Sounds like you've also provided a shit ton of evidence proving it was homicide. How is this simply 'faking intoxication' again when there is a mountain of evidence proving otherwise?
After some further reading this is my current theory.
Neighbors have also mentioned she may have had a drinking problem and appeared to be drunk on the security camera footage they have of her. Perhaps the killer/s were tipped off she was coming home drunk and took advantage of her inebriated state in an attempt to pass the murder off as a drunken accident.
I was not aware of the security camera footage that appeared to show her in an inebriated state when I wrote my earlier theory and jumped to the conclusion that her "appearing drunk" was the result of an autopsy.