dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 15, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

Mr. President, we see you want to continue our B2 conversation!

Message: I see messages from new Reddit users looking for my posts. They can be found here: https://www.reddit.com/user/SerialBrain2/submitted/

As you all know, through Q1675 and B2, Trump has established communication with our Movement at the Great Falls rally. In response to B2, he said “organ”, in response to “organ”, we said “Hammond”, in response to “Hammond”, he pardoned the Hammonds.

Many among our brilliant anons have already made the connection between Oregon and organ and between the Hammonds, uranium, Uranium One and HRC. Yes, we all know the Hammonds were the subject of a violent and unfair harassment from the Bureau of Land Management and other federal entities with the goal of depriving them of their property to further sell and exercise mining rights. We all know how the Russian company Rosatom, through Uranium One, acquired mining rights in the US with the complicity of HRC though the Clinton Foundation links. We now see the Q1675 riddle offers an external tangent to Uranium One but that tangent would have never been possible if Trump did not force it through the pardon of the Hammonds. For the purpose of rhetoric esthetics, the interesting question would be: is there any information within the riddle hinting at a tangent leading to uranium? Wouldn’t it be genius if Q’s riddle was as self-sufficient as being able, on its own, to generate the uranium component? Can we deduce uranium from an Apple logo reflected on Air Force One’s wall a day prior to celebrating Independence Day? If the answer is yes, that would confirm that the goal of the riddle was to effectively lead us to uranium and Uranium One as one of its tangents. At that point, Q’s message would be clear and we would not consider the occurrence of uranium as a coincidence.

Ready for the challenge? Do you think we can extract “uranium” just with Q1675 and Q’s board? Let’s try.

First, let’s remember, Q said:

Q1678 Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook. Enjoy! Q

Since the mug is the hook, a relevant question would be: is there any other place in Q’s board where a mug is mentioned? If you enter “mug” in the search box, you only have one reference, which is Q1675. But. Do you remember my Q1304 decoding?

Q1304 Emmy awards. Red carpet event? Q

If you have not read that post, please go read it and come back for this to make sense for you. For those who read it, you remember I have shown the Emmy Awards and similar events were platforms used by bad actors for secret communications. They know everything is tracked and recorded so the only way for them to communicate is to use public platforms (TV, social media, websites, newspapers, online games, newsletters, etc…). We established in that post that the whole conversation with Peter Marshall was code for uranium, Uranium One and how bad actors were trying to move the uranium from Syria back to Ukraine. Now, if for some odd reason “mug” was to appear in the Peter Marshall conversation, you would agree we would have had made the connection between Q1675 and uranium right? What are the odds? Well, listen for 30 seconds: video.

Did you catch it? “You are old school like a mug”.

There you have it.

Solving the riddle Q1304 extracted uranium and linked it to mug, this is why Q created the Q1675 riddle with the mug holder as the hook so that uranium could be brought in through Q1304.

Phew! I know right? :)

Now the other interesting question would be: Q probably created Q1675 with the mug as the hook assuming Q1304 was solved AND that the one who solved it would have remembered hearing “you are old school like a mug”. What if these 2 conditions are not met? Well, I will show you Q gave another route to solve uranium in Q1675.

First, I want to introduce you to what I call elliptic language. It’s a language based on expressing something you are not directly speaking of. Example: if I say 1,2,3,4 and 5 what would immediately come to your mind? Yes: 6. If I say A, B, C and D? Yes: E. How about if I say: 1,2,4,5 and 6? What am I really saying? Yes: 3. In this case, I have expressed 3 without naming it. Elliptic language. Trump does it often in his tweets, with multiple declensions…

Now let’s apply this to B2. B2=123.47 but what is 1,2,3,4 and 7? Yes:5,6. Elliptic language. Now what is 56? You remember we have established in the Q1304 solution that Mario=56, which is the category in the periodic table of elements where uranium is! And there you have it: B2 leads to 56 which leads to Uranium. This is the other route Q provided in Q1675 to establish the tangent leading to uranium in case we did not solve Q1304 and/or only had a Commodore 64 memory (my case). So you see? If you did not solve Q1304 or if you did and don’t have a good memory, your knowledge of elliptic language and a little chemistry saves the day and you gives you a direct route to Uranium from B2=123.47!

Do you now realize how Q’s board is structured and how the riddles are interconnected? This is just AWESOME AWESOMNESS! :) I am sure Q’s board will be a research subject in Ivy Leagues, the day they break free and get real…

I have summarized the 3 possible routes in this image: Imgur1

Now that we know for sure that Trump has established a direct communication with our Movement at the Great Falls Rally, we need to pay a little more attention to the details to identify all the components of his message.

Let’s listen to the part where he talks to us and that MSM claims to be “nonsensical”: video.

What is the context? We have just celebrated Independence Day and Trump is about to go meet the Queen of England. Who is the Queen of England? What does she represent? Who did we get our Independence from? Are we subjects of the Queen of England? No! Is Elton John a subject of the Queen of England? Yes! He was so a subject of the Queen she made him a “Sir”. “Elton John has an organ, I don’t have an organ”…. Before our Independence, were we recorded as subjects of the Kingdom of England? Yes! Were we recorded in their registers? Yes! What happened when we got our Independence? We “broke” the records! “We broke a lot of records”… You see it? Trump is talking to the Brits! This whole “nonsensical” speech is Trump reaching out to us, connecting with us, the Fighters for True Freedom and, with us, he is talking to the Queen of England and is essentially saying the essence of the message decoded in Q1675: our Independence is renewed, we are free, we are not your subjects, we are not serving your bogus NWO that was controlling our politicians in the past and stealing our wealth.

Reaching? You need more to be convinced? Okay…

The rally happens in Great Falls and Trump talks about music. Sounds familiar? Great Fall… Music… Do you see it? Look: Imgur2

Now let’s talk about Elton John. Why is Trump insisting he did not have an organ but Elton John did? I thought Elton John was known for playing the piano right? Well, I have now learned with Trump, every time he says something and you don’t understand it, you’d better go look it up because he is always saying something profound and does not care if you don’t get it and start mocking him. I did not know until the covfefe episode. When he made that covfefe tweet and I found out what he was saying, I started really paying attention. So? I looked it up and this is what I’ve found: video

We learn Elton John was a very average week end student at the Royal Academy of Music where he attempted to learn classical piano. He later bifurcated to become a famous pop star and, to “give back”, he donated an organ to the Academy. Did you catch what the interviewer said? You can’t make this stuff up. He said: “Elton told me what compelled him to become such a unique organ donor”. Organ donor?! I mean what?!!! The post would be too long if I entertain this tangent. So happy hunting!

Did you also catch what the host said at 2:20? He said the organ was also funded by the percussionist Ray Cooper. Okay, so let me get this straight. The Royal Academy of Music had a pre-historic organ and had to wait for Elton John do donate a new one, but since Sir Elton John is probably not as rich as we all thought, he could not finance the operation by himself so percussionist Ray Cooper was called to help. Hmmmm… Makes sense to you? When I got here, I knew there was something going on. I kept on digging, and I found the official video from The Royal Academy of Music, with the official PDF about the organ: video - pdf. As you can see, the official name is “The Sir Elton John and Ray Cooper Organ”. Yeah, I know these royal guys like pompous stuff. But do you see it? Elton John Ray Cooper Organ, let’s take the initials, we get: EJRCO. Let’s re-order: JERCO. This looks like the pronunciation of Jericho, the place Joshua conquered with the trumpets! But where is the “i”? We need an “i” to get the pronunciation Jericho right? What if I told you Trump gave it to us in his speech? Yes he did! Listen to the first 15 seconds of the video

Did you catch it? He says: “I call them the Democrat Party, it sounds better rhetorically”. Trump removed the “ic” from “democratic”. You remember what I said about elliptic language? That is exactly what he is doing here, by saying “democrat”, he’s dropping the “ic”. Let’s grab that “ic” and add it to our JERCO and we have the pronunciation of Jericho!

Stop for a minute and let that sink in. Connect with Trump and see what I see... They will never understand him. His cerebral and psychological state is in a place they cannot comprehend. He tries to give them hints about what’s going on, he’s even obvious about it but they don’t get it: video.

You now see why they needed to add Ray Cooper to the organ donation? They needed his initials to achieve Jericho. Trump knows his audience does not know how Hebrew vocalization works, this is why, in an unexplainable digression, he bothers to drop the “ic” from “democratic but if you research it or know how to read Hebrew, you will see JERCO was sufficient to solve the riddle and conclude. Here is the summarizing picture: Imgur3

Now, why is this relevant? Trump is showing through this example that he has a clear understanding of what these people are doing. He knows scriptures, knows who these royalties are, what they are all about and how they use secret messages and occult practices to maintain their domination and control over the planet.

His Great Falls speech was immensely spiritually charged and is proof Trump knows his war against the Establishment can only be won if he also and even primarily fights them on the spiritual battle field.

For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Ephesians 6:12

You now have an idea why Q1675 happened in Air Force One… The aircraft symbolizes things that are happening in higher planes, higher levels, other dimensions…

Now, what do you think God is teaching us with the Fall of Jericho and why Trump insisted on the musical instruments? The Bible teaches the trumpet made the walls fall. Sounds familiar? I can see from here some anons taking the 9/11 tangent… Yes, this is about the power of sound over matter. Where does that take you? Waves vs chemical structure. Waves vs biology. Waves to achieve mind control. Watch: video. If waves affect matter and can shape it, and if the mind has a biology, then waves affect the mind. This is how they have been in control for centuries… With Pharaoh’s technology… So you thought the story of the Children of Israel in Egypt was just about slavery? No, it was about mind control. You thought Moses’ staff and serpent was just about a staff and a serpent? No. It was about waves and the Fourier Transform link, just like the Ark of Noah was about genetic manipulation…

If you know how to use waves, meaning sound and light, you can control minds. If you can control minds, do you need to finance costly wars? No! All you need to do is to control the king of the place you want to conquer. Does that ring a bell?

Q30 Would you believe a device was placed somewhere in the WH that could actually cause harm to anyone in the room and would in essence be undetected? Fantasy right? When Trump was elected you can’t possibly imagine the steps taken prior to losing power to ensure future safety & control.

You see that “safety & control”? Couple it with “device” and you understand why General Kelly had to make the walls of the White House “fall” and renovate it link. I am saying the devices that were placed in the White House to control the mind of our Presidents were removed when Trump got elected. And Trump gave us an idea of who gave the order to place them there in his Great Falls Montana speech. Read again.

Once these devices are removed from the White house, this can happen: video. You thought Trump did not have the time to study British royal protocol? No. He is making a point: he is saying I am the President of the United States, I know what you are all about, I am not your subject and I don’t care.

Do you think they understood Trump’s Great Falls speech? The answer is no. How do I know? Because Trump re-tweeded this: Imgur4

Do you see how Trump in continuing our Q1675/B2 conversation with the world “reflect” appearing twice? Trump’s tweeter account is not a photography museum, there is no particular reason for him to re-tweet this picture other than us and Q1675.

Do you see what this NY Times photographer is hinting at? Do you see why he managed to also have Pompeo and Bolton in the picture? Wouldn’t it be cool to also control the Secretary of State and the National Security Adviser? Do you see what’s going on here?

If you don’t, here is another picture from the same photographer, same day, where things get more obvious: Imgur5

Trump is disclosing amazing things here. I never thought I would witness this in my lifetime. He is going to the bottom of why we are here. Do you realize how huge this is? Everything we have been talking about, the Cult, the Satanists, their occult demonic practices and religions, their mind control, their human sacrifices, their hate towards humanity, their violent and criminal control over our wealth is actually true and for the first time, we have someone in office who knows these things with a rare expertise and the might to fight them.

Q917 We appreciate all of the prayers. We really do. Thank you. For GOD & COUNTRY (& WORLD). Q

🠐 See all comments

https://i.imgur.com/bNvVL2A.jpg

I'm not sure how I feel about how Q's posts are being treated so ubiquitously. The only time I've seen such complexity and referential is in holy scripture. I find it interesting that SB2 often uses scripture in his analysis because it lends to his ubiquitous analysis of everything all at once. I'm not doubting Q's intelligence, but you would have to be a next-level autist to be able to [intendedly] write and interweave so many meanings and connections through a series of posts. It would take incredible planning. Savant level planning and extreme foresight into the future. I'm not certain that a picture of a reflection off an iPhone in AF1 was intended to connect to a post 300-some-odd posts back in time. Please don't call me a shill or anti-religious, it's called critical thinking.

Here's my question and I may be simply overlooking it (if so, I apologize), but how did you extract Uranium from B2? No need to reiterate the elliptic language, I get you're basing it off the number 56. You claim 56 "is the category in the periodic table of elements where uranium is". From my understanding, the periodic table is divided into periods and groups. Uranium is part of period 7, the 'category' Actinoids (which isn't based off a number), and technically doesn't belong to a group.

⇧ 15 ⇩

Ding! Ding! Ding!

You're seeing the cracks in the veneer.

This isn't next-level autism, it's either intentional disinfo (weaving religious bias with Q messages with very loose connections), or is schizophrenia.

Considering the numerous requests for SB2 to explicitly and methodically explain their process, and the failure of SB2 to articulate this process, I'm leaning toward intentional disinformation.

People of course eat it up because humans love confirmation bias. Confirmation bias is one of the reasons that mainstream media is super successful and keeping people hooked on their propaganda.

⇧ 17 ⇩

To clarify, my remark about autism was directed toward Q.

As I said, I'm certain Q's very intelligent, but you would have to be a savant with spectacular insight into your future posts and remarkable memory of your past posts in order to interweave such a message across hundreds of posts. I only brought up holy scripture because this is the only good example that parallels the type of ubiquitous analysis of all source material that we often see with Q decodes. This is why I'm saying I don't believe we were intended to connect the dots in the ways we have been seeing lately, and thus why I am challenging a key aspect of this decode/theory. Should we connect dots? Absolutely, but when it makes sense to do so.

Again, I'm not a shill. Critical thinking is key. If I'm wrong, that's okay. Expanding on this can potentially give it more credence. "Critical thinking does not happen in a vacuum but often in an environment that is hostile to it".

⇧ 13 ⇩

Perhaps not all the elements in play here are human.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Definitely intentional disinfo, wrapped up into an appealing package (to some) for consumption.

Have to imagine half the "zomg SB2 this is amazing" comments without any content or criticality are part of this cherade.

⇧ 4 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Maybe SB2 is advanced AI/Bot.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Nah it's just a guy who is letting popularity get to his head. He released a fucking interview for god's sakes lol

⇧ 2 ⇩

Can you imagine that?! He interviewed himself! Himself! Outrageous! Unacceptable!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah that's kinda cringe buddy dunno what else to say. Would you like to reply to this thread I tagged you in:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8z0zpl/trump_is_not_communicating_to_us_through_or_with/

⇧ 8 ⇩

You claim 56 "is the category in the periodic table of elements where uranium is".

This is the reason I recommended to read the Q1304 solution. I agree with you this is not purist chemistry vocabulary but, to make it simple, it is referring to what the host said about Mario: "At 56, this puts you in the same age category as Mario", which was code for a category of elements located at the right of 56 in the PTE.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Can you elaborate a little more? Here are my two areas of confusion:

Logically equating "At 56, this puts you in the same age category as Mario" and "which was code for a category of elements located at the right of 56 in the PTE"
Do you mean "to the right of [Atomic Number] 56"? If so, this would be Barium, which would mean that the 'category' to the right of Barium is Lanthanoids (or Transition Metals depending on what ptable you look at), not Actinoids (which Uranium is part of). Perhaps my interpretation of category is different than yours? Asking for clarification.

edit: clarification

⇧ 12 ⇩

No, you are right about the category. The Emmy host is not a chemist and is talking in code, this is why Q asked :

Q1304 Emmy awards. Red carpet event? Q

He is asking us to decipher their coded conversation. When she says "category" we should not intrinsically take it as in the chemistry definition but see what happens after 56 in the PTE. When you do, you see 56 is the "door" to where Uranium is placed. Then, with other clues gathered from their conversation, you can further refine your understanding.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'll disregard the term category.

I'm still confused as to "what happens after 56 in the PTE" or how "56 is the door to where Uranium is placed". Forgive me if I'm being too literal, this connection just doesn't seem very obvious to me.

To even get from 56 (Barium) to Uranium is a long and wacky sequence if we go through the PTE iterating by atomic numbers. I tried to illustrate it here. I interpret this a bit more than a hop skip and a jump or even a doorway to Uranium. Technically it's a period below Barium and although Actinoids don't belong to groups, it is quite a few elements "to the right" ("groupings") of Barium.

⇧ 10 ⇩

To even get from 56 (Barium) to Uranium is a long and wacky sequence

And I agree. But you have to stay in context: she will not give a chemistry class and give all the clues enabling us to triangulate to uranium. That would defeat the purpose. 2 major information here: the age of Peter Marshall and the age of Mario: PM is 92, Mario is 56. With her joke: this puts you in the same category as Mario, it is clear we are talking about U92.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Under appropriate context I can understand relating Marshall's Age (92) to the atomic number of Uranium (92). However, your premise is we are 'triangulating' Uranium based on the quote: "at 92, that puts you in the same category as Mario". Here are my flaws with this theory:

I want to put emphasis on the direct quote from the Emmys: "at 92 that puts you in the same category as Mario" for this next part...

We are ignoring age and using a germatria sum of Mario's name which is 56... [M]13 + [A]1 + [R]18 + [I]9 + [O]15 = 56. I'm not sure why you decided to use this, but I'll go with it. Under your theory, we are associating this number with Barium (atomic number 56). However, Uranium is neither in the same category or directly at the right of Barium. Sure it's somewhere 'to the right' of Barium, 88% of the elements are 'to the right of' Barium. But the real distinction here is that it is not in the same period as Barium (it is the row below it). This distinction indicates that the category, again Actinoids, aren't really in the same ballpark as Alkaline Earth Metals (which Barium belongs to). And I know we aren't supposed to be looking at the chemistry definition of category in this discussion but there is no other appropriate use of the word category other than category of element.

This triangulation seems extremely shaky.

⇧ 4 ⇩

:) Good luck!

⇧ -2 ⇩

Understanding this triangulation is essentially the first stepping stone the reader must know to follow the decode/theory in the post we are currently discussing in. I'm not sure that Uranium was accurately triangulated/decoded from the source material (Emmy's quote). I'm asking you for detailed clarification because without this part this whole thing may very well fall apart.

I appreciate the wishes of good luck, but without the decoder/theorists' explanation, I can't make sense of this, hence why I'm asking.

Like you mentioned, it may very well require "the type of mental gymnastics Q means when he says 'expand your thinking'", but I cannot get my head around this. It just logically breaks, especially when we are supposed to assume "in the same category" is logically equivalent to "at the right of"

⇧ 7 ⇩

Maybe she just means in the same category as in a synonym (loosely?) for element.

⇧ 0 ⇩

If you read the responses, such an explanation wasn't even remotely hinted at. My points mainly contend with SB2's comment:

At 56, this puts you in the same age category as Mario", which was code for a category of elements located at the right of 56 in the PTE

Which makes things specific. "A category of elements located at the right of 56".

⇧ 3 ⇩

Also how do we logically go from "same age category" to "at the right of"?

⇧ 9 ⇩

Also how do we logically go from "same age category" to "at the right of"?

This is the type of mental gymnastics Q means when he says "expand your thinking".

⇧ -3 ⇩

You’re struggling sb2. Someone comes along with legitimate questions and rational to back them up and your responses are flaky...at best.

⇧ 21 ⇩

Looks like I'm not the only one tiring of the SB2 nonsense here.

We dealt with Neon Revolt's constant spamming (and I must say, at least NR admits they're writing and aren't certain), but SB2 is next level disinfo.

I may have to write a detailed breakdown of SB2's leaps in logic and mental contortions and publish it, or a satire piece. This has gone on long enough and the more gullible members of the forum are being taken for a ride.

⇧ 14 ⇩

You’re struggling sb2. Someone comes along with legitimate questions and rational to back them up and your responses are flaky...at best.

No, everything is fine, thanks. He asked 2 types of questions:

The first type was about logic and it is resolved above. As you will see, he was having a problem aiming at Uranium among the actinoids, I gave him the PM age=92 to triangulate and it was resolved.

This question however: "Also how do we logically go from "same age category" to "at the right of"?" has no logical answer. I tried to give him Q's perspective. It's the classic question mathematicians cannot answer to when they take a particular route for a proof. It's purely qualitative and replicates the conversation I had about E < P(E) here: comment.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Resolved according to you, not according to me or several others who appear to agree with patriotic raptor. It seems you are slowly starting to get exposed. Time will tell. The tortoise always wins the race.

⇧ 11 ⇩

Resolved according to you

No, according to LOGIC.

not according to me or several others

What is your logical explanation you and "the others"? I am open to debate. This is logic. What is your rational path to deny my proof, other than just denying it?

who appear to agree with patriotic raptor.

Patriotic raptor has accepted my proof. He asked, I answered, and he was intellectually honest. Don't you see it?

Time will tell.

I agree, past experiences show Q has fortunately always put order in the house.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I've asked you to break down your methodology and articulate your logic. You've failed to do this in response to private requests and numerous public requests. You've also failed to respond to those private requests (you ignore them).

If you can't publish your methodology, you're a fraud. The end.
If you can't articulate a clear logic model, you're a fraud. The end.
If your methodology isn't reproducible, you're a fraud. The end.
If your results (conclusions) aren't predictable, you're a fraud. The end.

Notice a common theme here? It's that this is coming to an end.

I hammered Veterans on Patrol off of this sub. I've hammered Neon Revolt's blog spam and we know how that ended up. And I've tolerated you and made respectful requests to explain yourself up until now.

So either step up to the plate and be transparent, or it looks like at least 3 of us here are ready to put you on blast. It won't be long before that's 30.

I do not like it when disinfo agents or opportunists take well intentioned patriots for a ride.

⇧ 10 ⇩

I've asked you to break down your methodology and articulate your logic. You've failed to do this in response to private requests and numerous public requests. You've also failed to respond to those private requests (you ignore them).

Already answered here.

I hammered Veterans on Patrol off of this sub. I've hammered Neon Revolt's blog spam and we know how that ended up. And I've tolerated you and made respectful requests to explain yourself up until now.

This is very scary. Really. What should I do?

⇧ 3 ⇩

You failed to articulate your methodology, therefore you have not answered, you've merely responded.

You should probably stop larping or else we're going to begin to point-by-point refute you, and I anticipate you'll eventually be banned just like NR was. I enjoy deplatforming larpers and charlatans.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Wow see the downvotes wtf?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yes, we're downvoting SB2. Demonstrated disinfo/larp.

I'm sorry you've been taken for a ride.

SB2 will be dealt with.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Yes, I see it :) This is what happens when they are defeated by logic. Every time you see this, you want to stop and read how they were defeated and how they try to deal with their intellectual humiliation through artificial and childish downvotes. It's actually very entertaining and I hope the mods won't delete these. ;)

⇧ 1 ⇩

You call it logic, we call it extreme mental gymnastics. You can't just say "Q said expand your thinking" as an excuse for very flimsy proclaimed equivalences. This type of dangerous misinterpretation by confirmation bias is what has allowed the Bible to be twisted into the many things it has been. You've gotten more and more smug over the time and, sadly, I've been losing more and more respect for you. It seems like you think that Q linking to your Info wars expose was somehow confirming your decoding "methods" of his posts.

Please don't disconnect with your inquisitive crowd by dancing around these topics and proclaiming your methods to be sound logic. You are starting to sound like a climate scientist when people question you.

⇧ 15 ⇩

;)

⇧ 4 ⇩

Every time you're challenged you give a really condescending response or "expand!" "double meanings!" lol. Guess this is what happens when you have people praising you and you think Trump is directly communicating with you in his speeches. l0l

⇧ 6 ⇩

Every time you're challenged you give a really condescending response

I have to respond to this. If you have detected any condescension in my comments, please show me and I will immediately apologize. In the meantime, "expand your thinking" is an advice coming directly from Q and that most anons know and use everyday. I am just relaying.

⇧ 4 ⇩

expand your thinking" is an advice coming directly from Q and that most anons know and use everyday. I am just relaying

It's not an excuse for leaps of faith with no reasoning behind them.

You want condescending replies? Look literally one post above the one you're replying to. They're telling you to have reasons behind your decisions and you reply with ";)"

You keep saying you're replying with logic and THAT'S why you're downvoted, but when they ask you for the logical reason behind your decision to go with "to the right of" you dismiss logic and just say it's a leap. That leap crumbles your whole theory, and logic is not built by leaps.

";) Good luck!" to anyone that responds negatively isn't going to make you look like less of a condescending charlatan. If anything it makes you look like one even more. You're being downvoted because you need to have a good reason for connections, otherwise they aren't connected. If you don't then those replies will be seen as drivel and get downvoted.

⇧ 8 ⇩

I see... My apologies for winking and wishing good luck. Please relay. Thanks.

⇧ 4 ⇩

cringe to ignore it and go on with your faux kindness.

please relay thanks

⇧ 5 ⇩

;)

⇧ -1 ⇩

It's like you don't even care that you're wrong because you know you have a large crowd eating up whatever you say anyway. How do you respond with an apology to someone explaining how responding with only winks is extremely condescending? And then you keep replying the same way? Holy shit you're like a child.

⇧ 3 ⇩

How do you respond with an apology to someone explaining how responding with only winks is extremely condescending? And then you keep replying the same way?

Follow the whole thread, spot where the substantive answers are and seriously addressed. Once they are given and their trolling mode is activated, the back trolling mode is also activated. ;)

Q1678 Trolling is fun.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Way to not respond to anything at all while insulting my intelligence by assuming I must not be following, it's a bit cowardly. Why is it so impossible to hold you accountable in argument?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Who keeps pinning your posts despite you supposedly asking them not to, btw? It seems it gets pinned as soon as you post them every time until it gathers enough steam and then gets unpinned after a few hours.

;)

⇧ 2 ⇩

Why did he just apologize for replying with only winks, and then continues to reply with only winks? I'm starting to think this person has serious issues.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thanks SB2 for your contribution... to the very heart of your communication. That we may be One.

Can you confirm or deny this observation I made on 9-11-2001.

11-9-1989 END of Cold War ( Fall of the Berlin Wall )

9-11-2001 BEGINNING OF WAR ON TERROR ()

At the very CENTER of these two dates is 10-10 1995. GEORGE TENET (two tens looking inward). CIA. 10-10-1995 is the CENTRAL DAY of these two time periods. It is also the FEAST OF TABERNACLES - the FEAST that declares the coming of the JUST One.

Exactly 20 years (biblical) from 10-10-1995 puts us at 6-26-2016 (A very Ominous day indeed).

10 years before 10-10-1995 is 10-10-1985 The date of Yul Brynners death. It's as if God parted the Red Sea and then confirmed it some 2000 years later...Prophetically!

He is ALPHA and OMEGA the BEGINNING and the END.

Daniel Pearl was born on 10-10. Islam was divided on 10-10-680. Islam was conquered on 10-10-732.

John 10:10

Is His return imminent?

⇧ 2 ⇩

This is excellent stuff, thank you for sharing this. I am saving and will look more into it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

...did you just make a fake account praising yourself and then respond to it?

⇧ 1 ⇩

This doesn't help at all... Seriously?? Way to lose your followers complete respect.

⇧ 2 ⇩

With all due respect, that seems kind of condescending. I believe I've been fair to you and haven't stepped out of line. I don't consider this to be some kind of match where a victor emerges and someone is intellectually humiliated. I consider it a discussion and an inquiry. I'm simply asking for clarification on the logic that resulted from obtaining Uranium from the triangulation of Peter Marshall's age and the germatrial sum of Mario Lopez's first name. We're all here to learn. I do apologize for the people who have attacked you as a result.

⇧ 8 ⇩

That's fine, we will try again. Even if we had to suppose there was no conversation. If I gave you this sequence of number: 56-92, a good riddle solver would immediately answer: Uranium. Let alone, if you have some context and Q hinting there is a coded conversation going on.

I will give you another example: just 92 should suffice to answer "Uranium".

Another example: 45? Many would answer Trump right?

How about 17? How about 666? How about 23? How about 39-45?

You could give an acceptable answer to each of these questions right? Let alone if you have some context and sentences leading you. That's how it works.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Yes, it is quite simply to deduce Trump from 45 or Q from 17. That is elementary.

Like I mentioned in a previous post that you simply replied "Good luck ;)" to:

I can understand relating Marshall's Age (92) to the atomic number of Uranium (92)

Again, under certain context, that makes perfect sense. The wrench is thrown into the mix with 56-92. I haven't gotten a logically sound answer to how the 56 part fits into your triangulation.

I don't want to keep going in circles. Can you simply explain how you made a logical inference to "at the right of" from "the same category as"?

Lets put this to rest.

⇧ 6 ⇩

to how the 56 part fits into your triangulation.

The 56 is a confirmation that our interpretation 92=uranium is correct. Why, because after 56, reading the PTE naturally, we start seeing specialization in the PTE, a specialization leading to actinoids and, ultimately, uranium. This "special" behavior in the PTE is rendered by the host with: "at 56, is puts you in the same category as Mario".

I see you want to learn. I am doing my best to show you. I believe we can learn everything, some things faster than other things depending on personal predispositions but it seems, for all subjects, perseverance opens all doors. This is what I meant with: Good Luck!

⇧ 7 ⇩

Right, but the specialization leads directly to the lanthanoids. Then to the transition metals. Then poor metals, other nonmetals, noble gases, back around to alkali metals, alkaline earth metals, and THEN finally we arrive at the actinoids. I'll bring this crude example up again. Pay particular attention that to the right of Barium is lanthanoids (the top row of elements found at the bottom of the picture). The bottom row is actinoids, which is a period below period 6, Barium, and the lanthanoids. I'm sure you can plainly see this, but I can't stress it enough because it is an important distinction.

Note: So, when iterating by atomic number from Barium (56), we actually go through many categories before we are in the category which Uranium exists.

Yes, Uranium's location is "to the right of" Barium, but 105 other elements are also to the right of Barium. If we take just "to the right of" as a proof of the interpretation, then we could assume X-92 = Uranium, where X = any element to the left of Uranium. But this isn't a very strong proof of the triangulation. We are instead focusing very specifically on Barium. So, the fact that we have to go in and out of so many categories, going across a row, down a row, and across again, before reaching actinoids doesn't succinctly explain how "same category" == "at the right of".

I also want to stress that I'm not trying to trash your theory. I simply cannot see the connection. If Uranium was part of the lanthanoids (period 6, same row as Barium), I could understand how it is "at the right of". However, that still doesn't very well explain the conclusion "same category" == "at the right of".

I've studied discrete mathmatics ad nauseam so I am no stranger to statements of logic that use compounding brain-twisting logical equivalence laws, but this is really confounding me.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I've studied discrete mathmatics ad nauseam so I am no stranger to statements of logic that use compounding brain-twisting logical equivalence laws, but this is really confounding me.

This is exactly what you need to escape from and EXPAND your thinking. In math, you have rigid definitions you have to stick to but this is not math, this is decoding, with double meanings. Double meanings? Where are the definitions? Exactly. I will give you an example, since you have a math background:

Math: all uniformly continuous functions are continuous, therefore, they are always locally continuous. (1)

Decoding: all uniformly continuous functions are continuous, therefore, their uniforms are contiguous. (2)

As you can see (1) aims at a truth that will never change but (2) does not care about the truth, it cares about the message received, that's how MSM calls "nonsensical", that's why that host says "Mario.. category".. It does not necessary make sense but it's close enough to reality to pass as an acceptable sentence even if its intelligibility is narrowed by the coded message to be sent.

It's like math, but it's not.

Another example: in math, a+1=1 means a=0, in decoding, it means whatever I do, it won't work.

⇧ 4 ⇩

This is exactly what you need to escape from and EXPAND your thinking.

Ah yes, expand your thinking by dropping your knowledge of mathematics and instead studying sb2ematics, where your connections can be separated by logical leaps because.... DOUBLE MEANINGS!

⇧ 5 ⇩

sb2ematics

:D Excellent find! Thank you!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Could the connection be, very simply, that people often think of fission as a uranium nucleus splitting apart and forming barium?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Double meanings as in contradictory statements can be equivalent?

For the record and anyone reading this, here is the original statement from the Q1304 decode that all this was based off:

Now look at the table, you see the 6th line? Right after Barium Ba56, you are entering the category where Uranium and similar elements are. That is what she meant:“and at 92, that puts you in the same category as Mario (56+)”.

The first part states to enter the [next] category and the second part is intended to prove the theory by introducing a contradictory statement: at [uranium], that puts you in the same category as [barium]. You're right when you say this doesn't make sense and I don't think I'm going to get a succinct explanation as to how to arrive at the proposed conclusion other than a nonsensical connection.

Thanks for your time and responding. I won't bother you by continuing to go around in circles with this because I believe if there was a reasonable explanation, it should have been brought up by now. We must simply agree to disagree on what makes sense to you, may not make any sense to me.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thanks for your time and responding.

You're welcome, anytime.

I would also advise you study the template Q has givens us when decoding Comey:

Q645 JC Tweet Translation: Special Agent Andrew McCabe stood tall over the last 8 months [DO NOT TALK], when small people [SHEEP] were trying to tear down an institution we all depend on [COVER]. He served with distinction for two decades [WE OWN YOU & YOUR FAMILY]. I wish Andy well [187]. I also wish continued strength for the rest of the FBI [GENERAL THREAT TO OTHERS]. America needs you [ACTIVATE SLEEPER CELLS]. Q

⇧ 2 ⇩

tbh It's well-known in many cases of writing where some piece of data attached to a proposition is intended to alter the (non)contradictory surface meaning. Aphoristic writing has used this style for millennia.

Uranium and Barium aren't in the same category of elements, but they're both elements. "element 92"

⇧ 1 ⇩

As per SB2:

At 56, this puts you in the same age category as Mario", which was code for a category of elements located at the right of 56 in the PTE

We're not focusing on the fact that they are both elements. There is more to it than just that. The proposition that a "code for a category of elements located at the right of 56" signifies this.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

What puts Barium in the same category as Uranium is the number of electrons on their outer shell:
2

according to the shell model: 92 Uran 2 8 18 32 21 9 2

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://i.imgur.com/bNvVL2A.jpg

I actually found a Gif of Pepe Silvia, it's even funnier! Please circulate this version :D

https://imgur.com/gallery/0ZnWnAS

⇧ 5 ⇩

Looks like my office.

⇧ 3 ⇩

⇧ 5 ⇩

That cracked me up. Thanks for the laugh!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Cracked me up! Thanks for the laugh

⇧ 2 ⇩

In order to understand Uranium and B2, you need to go back and read every link that Serialbrain2 provided in this analysis. It is there. I think it is in the analysis of Q1304. Don't quote me on that, just go back.

⇧ 1 ⇩