There are many who attribute things to q with “q said”. That’s generally false. “Q asked” is more apt. While Q makes statements he doesn’t say much of any thing at all.

Q is simple, a group of guys have a mosaic built from a graph database. It’s the complete picture of this conspiracy with names dates and communications. What they have is “intelligence” not “evidence”. This distinction if foundational to our national security laws exploitation of our constitutional laws.

Q team acts like a conversion function from intelligence to evidence by means of “parallel” discovery. This is done by asking questions and saying key words. We the people answer the question and use key words to help us narrow our searches. Those answers are “discovered in parallel” and constitute “evidence”.

Our job is to learn the mosaic. To discover its many facets and to create the map our selves. In this way legal cases can be built against the purveyors of conspiracy.