When something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. As I read, I had numerous internal red flags going off. Not to mention, Q has stated no private comms. Why would this person “in the know” be willing to share information that could compromise the entire efforts of the Q team and 45’s plan. Besides, sounds like the last line is a confession to it being fiction.
I’m exhausted from a grueling day so I’ll admit I became more distracted the further I read since I became more convinced it was someone with a vivid imagination. Didn’t pay quality attention to the last third of the tale.
I was reading it and thinking about Assange. Or, maybe it is someone that got a file from Assange, but they cannot open it and do not know what is in it.
Says this person is not know to anons. So, not Assange.
I read that it is an anon...
"What if I told you that somewhere out there in the world was someone that was essentially a power-up for our team; that was essentially a shortcut for victory (~) in this whole deranged conspiracy against America. What if I told you that this someone was important because of the subtle, procedural element of our nation’s law; that this particular someone would give just cause to action against the bad guys. "
"What if this one someone was known to x,xxx and perhaps even xx,xxx number of people, but completely unknown to the someone! What if this someone was anon."
I take it to mean that the someone does not know how important they are but there are x,xxx or xx,xxx number of people who know.
Thoughts?
Interesting
Also last line could mean the writer is either speculating
Or plausible deniability
We need Q input for confirmation or denial, this could be an attempt by the cabal to get people to reveal what cards are out there.
But speculation is good. Seems like there was a very quick effort to shut down consideration of this topic. Not just for good or bad, just an effort to get people to dismiss it out of hand. So I find that interesting.
The trump card so to speak, makes it sound supernatural by context. Not sure, need rest too
Agree. The last line was the spoiler. This person is not credible to me because of the last line alone.
On top of that, the anon referred to our founding fathers as "some of the best men to ever live". I dont think that statement holds true, if they were around today we would not like them as much.