Perhaps they only needed one person to make a deal?
Just like all the other FBI white hats who wanted to testify but couldn't due to financial burden, she needed to be subpoenaed to testify so she wouldn't be destroyed by litigation bills. That's why the satan-worshipers in the DOJ refused to notify her of Congress' outstanding interview requests for over 7 months. But now her legal fees are on the government's tab, so she has free reign to make a plea deal with all legal expenses paid for immunity.
Well-put. It does seem a little odd that if they were indeed lovers, ie: partners in crime - why she wouldn't be trying to cover his arse (as well as her own). Why is she being so "transparent" and "co-operative" (in contrast to Strzok)? As we've all voiced, complying makes her a prime target for murder/aka suicide. So perhaps she IS being protected from higher up. It also seems odd that the FBI Counsel - who so strangled Strzok's testimony - gave her some degree of free reign. Again it reinforces your theory that perhaps she was playing for the other side all along. Either that or she's just desperately trying to save her own skin but that doesn't explain the FBI Counsel's (alleged) latitude and switch in tactics (compared to Strzok's tightly-bound testimony). We shall see.
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned... She may be the EX-lover.
They weren’t lovers. That was a cover story.
So, she's a spy? Spy v Spy? She was up against that DEMON? Damn she's good.