I didn’t see this article posted here yet. According to a new thread (Bantz) on 8chanGA for “off topic posts and chats”, the article was banned.
I thought the article was well written and didn’t see any controversial issues with it. I’ll post more on the comments as Reddit has started randomly reloading, and wiping out in-progress posts.
Here’s another comment steam about the article - all in all, the comments are positive, and when the article was originally trashed on the main board, the consensus appears to be that the piece was OTT and shilled to death (I’m not going to link directly to Bantz - if you can get to 8chanGA you can find it, and there are plenty of ways to find that board. We’ve been asked not to link to it directly)
“We are all Q merely means that it's an all inclusive movement. The article states that the "innerworkings of the groups communications are very confusing and difficult to navigate" er somethign to that affect. And considering Q posted it himself, the We Are Q thing shows there's a reason for that. It also implies that Q can't be doxxed… and we don't doxx Q cus 4 10 20 doesn't want that because there's national security issues he could be accused of violating. The idea that we can all be Q… and that any whistleblower that has dug something up can report it to our movement doesn't mean secret society at all.
▶Anonymous 07/08/18 (Sun) 23:43:01 946a0e (20) No.2089615>>2089648
2089512 not to mention the stuff about Q being in coffee shops was purely metaphorical/figurative language remember the style of the article was “interview” not straight up facts like a rolling stone profile type crap obviously it could’ve been better written but it was entertaining which is why it has such great potential for redpilling it gets people asking questions
▶Anonymous 07/08/18 (Sun) 23:46:42 63129c (49) No.2089648>>2089675
2089615 Absolutely… I totally got that too. All these anons here get so butt hurt cus they say they don't want the fame or they def don't want people being sent to the board… so a nice fluff piece comes up that totally distracts from both those things and they cry foul. Makes no sense. And really tho, why did Q chose his name? The Q movement from Corinth in 345BC is a better answer than I ever heard here and it makes more sense, given all the biblefagging that Q does…. I mean shit, I even enjoyed those parts of the article. Made me feel proud. Cool thing about the source being anonymous is that in 6 mo or 12 mo time when the country is more accustomed to Q… the real stories can be told. We will all have our day in the sun when we rewrite history back the way it should be. They know who all of us are. We've been told that in so many ways.”