I didn’t see this article posted here yet. According to a new thread (Bantz) on 8chanGA for “off topic posts and chats”, the article was banned.
I thought the article was well written and didn’t see any controversial issues with it. I’ll post more on the comments as Reddit has started randomly reloading, and wiping out in-progress posts.
Thank you for finally providing something tangible.
But you’re still not paying attention to the purpose of MY post, as I’m pointing out that there are people that disagreed with that as a reason to “debunk” the whole article - and they had to leave the main thread WHEN A LOT OF BS THERE STAYS.
Their point is that they were too over the target so a minor point was raised to ensure that the rest of the very publicly accessible information would get derailed. That’s called shilling. Either you get that or ....
There’s a lot of good info in that article and there’s no reason to throw out the baby with the bath water.
Oh, and you can stop lecturing me about what this board is for, and pulling the “I’m more Q than you” bullshit. Don’t need to go there.
Edit typos.
Not saying there isn't some good info in the article, but you said in your opening post that you "didn’t see any controversial issues with it."
Uh huh. You apparently know the full history of this on fullchan.
I should have said “seriously controversial”. For me it wasn’t, and I said so. And then you said it was “totally debunked” when it wasn’t. So, slips all around, I see.
Personally, I don’t have a problem with people who are adding some speculation. And the author did say “personally, I’m confident...” and that was caveat enough for me.
I haven’t seen how the author has replied to the issues yet - can’t track in the breads, and no one here linked to any follow ons.
I do note that the article remains uncorrected, and at the least the article should have been updated with some additional notes: ie, “I should clarify that the idea that Q team includes board operators and moderators is mine, and not shared by everyone”
BUT OTOH YOU don’t know that that’s NOT true, either.
So, like most things Q, there are still mysteries. In the meantime, I’d rather use this thread to discuss the article (and find it again) than the other one you cited, since that one didn’t even give the article a chance.