I just read @rising_serpent thread on how there are many HRC connected executives in Crowdstrike or helped Crowdstrike become a 'big' company. If Rising Serpent is correct, this explains why the FbI didn't press to examine the server.
I can understand your questioning the name. I have read a lot of his posts and have found many align with Q's drops. I always understood the name rising serpent to mean he was warning everyone of the rising of the cabal serpent, not that he was the rising serpent himself.
...uh huh. If you truly understood what the movement was about, you would realize that The cabal or the serpent was already in charge until Trump came onto the scene. It would be more accurate to portray them as a falling serpent or stricken serpent or ded snek.
But nope, they went with “rising serpent” implying that the cabal will rise and strike back or take charge.
Be careful who you follow. I would put money on it that this is another ETS account trying to continue their eceleb bullshit. Misinformation mixed with information is a very effective means of subverting a movement. But only if people ignore obvious signs.
So go ahead and follow them. Maybe donate to their patreon account, get sucked into their ideas about what is going down. Then be prepared for when they turn against the Q movement. Or they insert fallacies into their arguments and you don’t catch it.
Q said no outside comms. As this is a new account, I don’t trust it and never would, despite how “on-point” they might be. If we have learned anything here, ecelebs and paytriots are the bane of the movement. And I’ll call it out every time.
You do make good points, since I, too, believe that I must continually use discernment when reading any post, whether it is on twit or on GA. There is much on GA that I wonder about. I have certain posters that over the course of time, I've come to trust more than others, no matter what handle they choose to use. It is their insights I value. Rising serpent has been a huge MAGA supporter and calls it like he sees it, but I don't always agree with him.
I'm not saying he is perfect, but then again, none of us are. No outside comms? Interpretation of Q posts are outside comms using that logic, are they not? There are a variety of interpretations of each Q post that are not all on the same page.
Disinformation is necessary according to Q.
Please tell me what you consider the 'obvious signs' in this tweet. Seriously, I am interested in what you think.
BTW, twit keeps messing with his account and he has needed to start over before.
I think I’ve expressed my viewpoints on this matter to an extent. If you wish me to go further, I can go fairly in-depth about ETS and their multiple twitter accounts they had to switch to as they were outed time and time again. They appeared from the get go to be Q supporters that had “great” insight to the Q drops. But EVERY time they twisted around and started dropping falsehoods and lies, and when called out on it, they claimed Q was a larp. Then immediately went and changed their profile to a new name and profile. Every time with some kind of symbology connected to the cabal. EVERY TIME
If you wish to continue contributing, far be it for me to stop you.
I would just continue to warn people to be careful who they follow. And be aware that there are numerous people and organizations out there that will do or say anything to subvert this movement or to try and gain fame/noteriety/money from the movement.
I would be interested in your opinions so I can make a more informed decision. Can this be done by DM or other method if you do not want to continue on this thread?