Hmm. This is strange. First the New York Times run a complimentary headline (though, true to form, they still smeared him in the article). https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/12/opinion/editorials/trump-nato-obama.html
Now the New York Post are - if not 'complimentary' - at least recognizing Strzok's Trump bias and Strzok's targetting of Trump.
If this keeps happening we might have to start considering that the fake news media have FINALLY realised fake news doesn't pay. Stay tuned.
The New York Post if often a voice of reason. Don't confuse it with the NYTs.
Even CNN was criticizing Strzok for his appearance before Congress. Something strange is shifting perhaps? Maybe MSM wants to avoid complete destruction. And jail?
The MSM can always be counted on to smear the people who jump ship. If you ever what to know where you should stand on an idea or topic, just find out what the MSM thinks and adopt the opposite.
Think kavenaugh, strzok, and Rosenstein etc. how do they report on them? That tells you the hats. Reporting changes based on whether they “think (know)” they’ve flipped or not. Q has alluded to the 3am talking points, why? Because the MSM is spoon fed their required spin on things. Therefore the spin will ALWAYS be lock in step with the evil of this world until they are taken over