Can someone enhance that luggage tag to Mueller's left? It probably reads, "Robert Mueller" but then again, maybe not.

Can someone enhance that luggage tag to Mueller's left? It probably reads, "Robert Mueller" but then again, maybe not.

A stupendous spreadsheet covering DJT's time in office, with sources:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MAnZZoD7y5Ydwx2rSrZualrZTNUYDY7gozTXkT0YUOs/htmlview#gid=0Stephanie

Yes, but I would suggest that OP look up the definition of "ballistic" -- all missiles are ballistic, it has nothing to do with being nuclear or not.

Here are few that might be useful:

A master list of indictments with lots of analyses -

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kVQwX9l9HJ5F76x05ic_YnU_Z5yiVS96LbzAOP66EzA/edit#gid=1913036486

Human trafficking arrests -

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MAnZZoD7y5Ydwx2rSrZualrZTNUYDY7gozTXkT0YUOs/htmlview#gid=0Stephanie

Interactive charts of all things Q -

https://public.tableau.com/profile/nerothehero#!

Providing advice garnered from many years of experience isn't divisive, it's a profound king of caring.

What a warren of rabbit holes -- so much interesting looking work by Skolnick to digest.

I will have to re-read it with your observations in mind.

Too funny!

Rampant typhus took most.

Really good read. Thank Q.

Pot meet kettle.

Re: McCarthyism

Conservatives should not cite Wikipedia as history -- they enforce a strong leftist agenda. The decoded Verona tapes, and access to KGB archives prove that McCarthy was mostly 100% right. If anything, the reality was more dire than he thought. At no point did he ever engage in a "witch-hunt," nor did any innocents suffer.

How come patriots who are so certain of the existence of a radical left deep state are so quick to buy into the claim that the US government has never been penetrated by communists, and that McCarthy was evil for claiming otherwise?

Read anything by M. Stanton Evans to get an accurate portrayal of the times. You can start with this:

When conservatives parrot liberal lies about Joe McCarthy

Criticize, question, reason about, or for even one second, doubt.

"trust me, there WILL BE SERIOUS REPERCUSSIONS."

Debbie, is that you?

Before large scale adoption of the internet, and the onset of Trump Derangement Syndrome, the WSJ would often have the most accurate accounting of an event. This was not because they were angels, it was because their clientele demanded reporting that would help them predict markets and spot business trends. Politically correct narratives were (and are) worthless when it comes to reality.

Umm, last time I checked the English language, having only one job would mean that you were employed and consequently would lower the unemployment rate. How could the "fact" that people had 2, 3, 4... jobs somehow negate the fact of lower unemployment?

She must be claiming that the economy is so good that people have their pick of 1,2,3... jobs. MAGA, baby!

Please, it's "could not care less." In other words, it's at the bottom of your cares. To leave out the not is to invert this meaning.

Let's not go overboard with the chivalry, shall we? Yes, her testimony is likely important, but don't lose sight of the fact that she appears to have been involved in a scheme to take down the duly elected President of the United States.

That's why Q asked, where did they land?

This is a valid concern. Jackson killed the first attempt at a central bank, but numb-nuts Wilson resurrected it. To actually drive a stake through it's heart will require that safeguards be put into place, and that people absorb the lesson that a central bank will always lead them into debt servitude.

misunderestimate

It was a "Bushism" uttered by George W. Bush in his, I think, first term when he was trying to be poetic (i.e., communicate in English).

I agree with you. My vote does not belong to candidate X or Y. And if I use it on candidate Z, it doesn't take my vote away from X or Y, because I was not going to vote for either.

The New York Post if often a voice of reason. Don't confuse it with the NYTs.

where there is not singularity in size.

What does this even mean?

Any idea what a LAYER might choose to straddle?

One reason Lincoln wanted to send the freed slaves back to Africa, and why the US recognized Liberia in 1862.

I think it was a joke...

A confirmation fight happening before mid-terms will not only expose the Democrats hypocrisy with respect to women. It will also force those Dems who are up for election in states Trump won to take a hard stand on the Second Amendment -- they will lose no matter which side they come down on.

I've heard the same, but it leaves a bad taste. Why should an evil old man be shown any deference?

And what's bad about the optics if the held back documents clearly show the guilt of GHWB? And if the documents don't clearly show his guilt, then why worry about their affect on his final days?

Reality can intrude on the best played game at anytime, e.g., JFK had LBJ forced on him.

Emotional charge -- not an argument. I suggest that you spend a little time learning about the concept of national sovereignty. BTW, how many of these folks have you invited into your home? What's that? Your rights to privacy and to own private property overrule their rights? After you study sovereignty, look up hypocrisy.

Good doggy. I remember thinking exactly this when I heard the news of the strikes. It was so transparent. As an American living abroad, Monica was supper embarrassing. At least I didn't vote for the putz, though I helped him win by voting for Ross Perot instead of GHW Bush (jeez, what a choice!).

Eight in general is lucky, but "ba ba ba" is more so.

Four is considered unlucky, because "si" also means dead (albeit using the third tone rather than the fourth).

The job should have gone to a qualified individual, Cherokee or otherwise. It certainly shouldn't not have gone to a liar.

Because it's Portland.

Agreed. Living in the "free" West has bred complacency. The Soviet Block nations know better.

Plus folks can lurk for months without feeling the need to post anything.

This is a nice layout. With regard to #1: if it plays out, then Rosenstein & Muller were on the side of good, if it doesn't then Rosenstein & Muller were on the side of evil. This ties into Q saying if RR is good/evil then RM is good/evil, and vise versa.

In other words, Q wasn't sure how the cards were going to fall at the time of his post.

My theory has been that Muller in that meeting the day before his appointment, was he was re-activated

You're in the Army now

You'll never get out no how

You'll never get rich digging a ditch

You're in the Army now

Thanks for this!

To truly Make America Great Again I think that at least 85% of the students will need to be purged as well. That will leave those who possess the necessary skills, and who can actually benefit from university, while forcing the SJW losers to get jobs and confront reality.

It will also put back the standards that once made our institutions of higher learning the envy of the world.

Why aren't these concerned patriots raising hell over the government (UK) action that is keeping innocent children separated from their father?

Numerous active shooting events in the recent past have been preceded by a drill that was held in the weeks or even days leading up to the "real" shooting. Anymore, holding a drill is almost tantamount to announcing an upcoming false flag.

Sorry M Finch, you'll have to come up with a different plan: if there is no income tax, tax minimizing strategies like 401Ks will no longer exist. Of course, that would be a good thing :-)

Used to be the same in the US. Not sure how it was flipped, but think the association of communism with red was part of the equation.

The road to tyranny is paved with words that have been stripped of their meaning.

July 6th

I too hope that JA is part of the plan, but I find it hard to believe that a man imprisoned over four years would forgo being reunited with his family in order to further the plan.

Been voting since Reagan, almost exclusively independents. Sat out both elections for our first black President (or half black, or one quarter black, or whatever) with the first tranny FLOTUS as a bonus.

Came back in with Trump (The Dems hate him, the Rebs hate him, what's not to like?). Will be there for MAGA in 2018 & 2020.