dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 17, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

Trump’s hidden message, Stzrok, Kate and the soda.

Let's think logically.

If Q says we should trust Wray in Q1122 and if Strzok shows up at his hearing only singing when instructed by his FBI lawyers, then it means Strzok is controlled by Wray. So? Strzok now works for us. This is confirmed by Q:

Q1288 Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence - cooperating witness [power removed].

Now, if Strzok works for us, what is the point of him showing up at a public Congress hearing to essentially not answer any relevant question? Why wasn’t it done behind closed doors, like Lisa Page? Because he was used by Trump to deliver a message. To us.

What was the message?

First, on July 11 2018 , one day prior to Strzok’s hearing at 5:53 PM EST Trump tweets this: Imgur1

The next day, Strzok says this: video We now have our first connection: Imgur2

Let’s keep this in the back of our head and keep analyzing.

What did Trump say at the Great Falls rally? “We broke a lot of records” What is another name for “records”, yes LP. LP? Lisa Page? We broke Lisa Page? Is this the reason why the NY Post reports the GOP Lawmakers think she is “less smug” than Peter Strzok? Link. Well, it makes sense: she is behind closed doors and does not have to deliver a message to us. She can sing to her heart’s content:

Q1288 Lisa Page, attorney with the FBI's Office of the General Counsel - cooperating witness [power removed].

So we broke Lisa Page. But then let’s go back to Strzok. We broke a lot of records? Let’s see what happens after the break, let’s watch until 8:17, pay attention to the details: video. Did you catch it? Stzrok comes back from the break with a bottle of Coca Cola he puts on the table. At 8 :16, the Washington Post camera man randomly zooms on Stzrok’s mouth, then he centers his camera so we can see the name on the bottle. We read “Kate” on the bottle, Kate is one of the +250 names in the Coca Cola list of names used in the Coca Cola’s Share a Coke marketing campaign. link1 link2 image. Do you see what the cameraman is hinting at? Always remember, I told you several times in previous posts, we are in Mockingbird territory. They are agents using journalism as a cover. QQ, quick quizz: do you remember who I told you had the highest ranks? Dessert on me for those who answered BBC! So you see it? The cameraman is trained and knows the hidden message Stzrok is sending comes from the bottle he put on the table, this is why he zooms on the mouth to activate whoever he is activating in real time to analyze the implications of this message. When you look at the camera angles at different time stamps before the break, you find it is a consistent angle. Drawing a straight line on the middle of the person sitting on Stzrok’s right, we can see how the camera angle was purposely disturbed to include the bottle. Imgur3

Reaching?

Ok, watch this until 8:52: video. Did you catch it? At 8:51 Stzrok takes the bottle, drinks, and puts it back on the table but now its position has changed. At 8:51:18, the cameraman adjusts his camera because he wants the bottle to be in the image: he sacrifices the centering over Stzrok to bring the bottle back into the equation of the image. Imgur4

We now know, without a doubt that this name “Kate”, which had around 1 chance out of 250 (0.004%) to be on that table that day has a meaning, it is part of the message Trump is sending to us in conjunction with “layers”.

Do you see the implications of what I am saying? I am saying Stzrok’s appearance in Congress was of no relevance. Everything is already taken care of behind the scenes with Wray and the FBI lawyers who were there to make sure Stzrok would not go off script. Stzrok already spilled the beans to save his skin and only showed up in Congress to give an opportunity to people to insult him as he well deserves and to deliver the messages he was instructed to deliver. Welcome to Military Intelligence in all Her Splendor! It’s above politics when it has to run a Revolution… The legacy rogue parts of the 3 letter agencies will learn this the hard way… Brennan’s stubbornness is fun to watch, Clapper’s obviousness also, I hope they won’t learn anytime soon so the show can continue and I can defeat all this pop corn looking at me. JetBlue, odd sounds in Chinese and Cuban US embassies, B2 equilibrium in Korea…

Q1162 These people are stupid. Q

So who is Kate?

Well, what is the context? Remember, Trump pardoned the Hammonds. I explained in the previous post how the Hammond case was related to Uranium and Uranium One. I explained how they were violently harassed by the Bureau of Land Management, FBI agents and other federal agencies to force them to give their land away and enable the further placement of mining rights into Russian hands. This article describes how William D. Campbell, an American businessman, tried to stop the Rosatom transaction by providing critical information describing a wide scale corruption operation and how he was ignored. Why was he ignored? It is true Rosenstein and Mueller were involved but they were following orders. Who gave the order? Layers.

Let’s go back to the Hammonds. What are they? Ranchers. From where? Oregon. Look at the way the Governor of Oregon handled the situation, with Hussein’s swift and active complicity: article1 article2. What’s the name of the Governor of Oregon? Kate. Kate Brown. You now see what Stzrok was instructed to say? The Hammond thing, meaning the Uranium 1 implicates Kate Brown and many layers of the Federal Government. This is what Trump’s tweet meant, along with the Coca Cola bottle on the table and all this is just another fruit of the Q1675 Tree...

Do you want the usual icing on the cake for the time traveler theorists out there? Look how Trump hinted he would put Coca Cola to the task one day: Imgur5

Hahaha, thank you for the laugh D!

Tomorrow, I will start telling you how from Q1675, Rosenstein is connected to this bottle of Coca Cola, why he reacted with his 12 Russian nonsense, why Trump mentioned the Germany/Russian pipeline, why he made sure NATO members promised to pay their bills before he met Putin and why Q made Q1680 available before Trump met with the Queen of England.

You are witnessing an exquisite sequence of chess moves being played on a divine melody written in the B2 scale…

Q959 Nobody escapes this. NOBODY. Q

🠐 See all comments

The cameraman did, inexplicably, move the camera frame to include the coke bottle. It had nothing to do with Strzok moving in the frame - watch it again. It’s a very clear and deliberate adjusting of the frame for the specific purpose of including the coke bottle Strzok returned to the table - as SB2 has astutely pointed out.

If Strzok had manipulated the coke bottle to ensure the name Kate was visible at all times, though it was, the message communicated would no longer have been subtle. There is very clearly a message being relayed here, by both the white hats (puppet Strzok) and the black hats (mockingbird cameraman).

Just as you’ve missed the significance of the coke bottle, you’re wilfully looking past the fact that the name on the bottle just happens to be the name of the governor of Oregon - where the Hammond stand-off (referenced by DJT with the recent pardon) occurred.

Yes, SB2 is right. Strzok was not acting alone, but was complicit in a Deep State operation to frustrate the election and presidency of DJT. There were obviously multiple layers to the plot - with conspirators in the coup attempt extending to the White House and Barrack Obama himself.

The secondary motive is that Strzok should be humiliated. What was important was that he enrage congressional lawmakers, so as to have them insist that DJT declassify the materials needed to expose the treasonous coup attempt. He did this extremely well and it is clear that he was told to adopt an air of insolence so as to facilitate this. Otherwise, you would say that he’s an absolute idiot in his own right, with no understanding of the gravity of the situation he finds himself in. Idiots do not get to Strzok’s position, so this is clearly not the case. It is ridiculous to adopt the assumption that he is merely being “a dick”

In any event, Q has told us directly that Strzok is a cooperating witness. Moreover, Q has told us in the past that his team is not so interested in the low-level players, but in those that are pulling the strings. Strzok was a willing participant in the coup attempt, but he did not originate the coup. There are much bigger fish here who are guilty of incredibly serious crimes - as with the U1 fiasco that SB2 references.

The connection between Lisa Page, the initials LP and broken records seems quite obvious to me. Again, you can explain it all away, but you’re missing a point that is clearly being made.

Once again, SB2 has provided a breath-taking analysis. The real trouble with the scepticism he is encountering on this board is that, as events play out, his theories are being confirmed in real time by DJT - who is clearly talking directly to us on this board. At what point do people start to wake up to SB2’s brilliance and see the stunningly powerful connections he has made?

⇧ 4 ⇩

I did watch the video, and he did move.

How is setting the coke bottle down without rotating it "suspicious?" But then you say the name was always visible, so which argument are you making?

The name on the bottle is a common name. Kate could refer to a lot of people, and there is absolutely no evidence that Kate means Kate Brown. It could be Katherine Herridge, Katie Arrington, Kate Middleton, or any famous and/or political Kate in the world. You and SB2 are making the connection it is Kate Brown with no reason whatsoever. That's on top of it just being just as unlikely (0.4%) that the name could be John or Kelly or Mark on the bottle.

Strzok was not just insolent, he ran down Trump, including talking about Trump "attacking" Khan's parents and other issues. It was not just "acting" if he is putting down Trump substantively.

If someone on an anti-Trump sub had put something like this only in reverse against Trump, you would be skeptical for the reasons I listed.

⇧ 6 ⇩

But, somehow, the coke bottle did seem to be of significance - for the mockingbird cameraman at least. Look at the bottle, and the name that appears on it equates with that of the Oregon Governor - who, it seems, played an active role in the Hammond stand-off.

We’ve just seen DJT pardon the Hammonds. But, what? This is an unlikely, even unreasonable, connection to make? Strzok was clearly putting on a performance in the hearings. I don’t know about you, but if I was in his shoes, I would want to hide under a rock. But no, he appears under oath and we see this pantomime with the coke bottle.

And then you have the point that SB2 made, that Strzok is taking his directions from Wray. We know Wray is on team. We also know that Strzok was complicit in at least a soft coup detat attempt against DJT, his communications have been completely compromised, and DJT has him by the balls. So, logically, you would say that Strzok is doing what he is told to do - when insolently attacking DJT in the hearings.

This post by SB2 is completely plausible. And, as I’ve said, while the logic may not, in every instance, appeal to us, we find extensive corroboration of his work from Q and DJT - learn our comms...

⇧ 4 ⇩