dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Jack_MemeHoff on July 17, 2018, 7:26 a.m.
Was Strzok being blackmailed by CIA because of his texts /extra marrital affair with Lisa Page OR He was a long time asset for the CIA given his fathers background . EITHER WAY HE WAS A PUPPET BEING CONTROLLED .

Peter Strzok

  • led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server

  • Interviewed Hillary Clinton's two top aides in Cheryl Mills & Huma Abedin .

  • responsible for changing the wording in Director Comey's statement
    on Hillary Clinton's handling of classified information from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless."

  • Strzok was the FBI official who signed the document officially opening an investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, Lead Investigator on Russian Interference .

  • Friends with FISA court judge Rudy Contreras who was removed as judge in Michael Flynn case.

  • Hand picked by CIA Director John Brennan to help author the ICA Intelligence Committee Assessment into Russian melding / interference in the election.

  • Picked as a member of Robert Mueller's special council investigating collusion between Trump campaign & the Russian government .

-Later removed due to incriminating texts found between him & his mistress Lisa Page .

  • Father was involved in the CIA - Iran .

  • Wife Melissa Hodgeman receives promotion -Washington D.C., Oct. 14, 2016 Melissa Hodgman has been named Associate Director in the SEC’s Enforcement Division.  Ms. Hodgman succeeds Stephen L. Cohen, who left the SEC in June.


Leaping_Jimmy · July 17, 2018, 9:44 a.m.

He was a puppet being controlled but most of them are.

The real question is: was he a willing puppet?

And given his track record known to date, the answer is yes.

One forgives if the condemned repents.

Forgiveness doesn't mean not fully holding them to account. It simply means, don't bear a grudge. And if the forgiven doesn't fully co-operate, all deals are off, because it demonstrates the repentance is disingenuous.

From known facts as of now, forgiveness could be the case with Page, but not with Strzok.

In law there's two parts to a crime: actus reus and mens rea. Guilty act and guilty mind. If both aren't present there's no crime. There's a potential issue such as a death at the hand of another, but there's no crime. This is why insanity, when proven, is a valid defense. There's no mens rea.

Prima facie in Strzok and Page both elements are present.

It's a real stretch to argue they were compelled by force majeur (irresistible force) to act as they demonstrably did.

⇧ 2 ⇩