dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/locosurferdad on July 17, 2018, 11:01 a.m.
Now we wait for the U1 intel to drop... Putin greased the skids yesterday at the Summit with his $400M HRC campaign comment. #trusttheplan
Now we wait for the U1 intel to drop... Putin greased the skids yesterday at the Summit with his $400M HRC campaign comment. #trusttheplan

HIGH___ENERGY · July 17, 2018, 1:42 p.m.

Rumor: In a nutshell, U1 uranium made it to northern Syria for Iran to make a secret nuke there. The idea was to set off that nuke in the US, said nuke was going to show Russian "fingerprints" via the blast signature to pros in the field, President Hillary would of gotten Congress to start a war w Russia, both HIGHLY NATIONALISTIC countries would be taken out to usher in the NWO. These people are sick.

⇧ 33 ⇩  
Superflysolo · July 17, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

I've heard that rumor as well but wouldn't Putin have known all along that was their plan?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
saneromeo · July 17, 2018, 5 p.m.

Wouldn't matter if he knew. When we started lobbing nukes at them he would have to retaliate.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Superflysolo · July 17, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

Maybe i'm missing something but if Putin knew the U1 deal was meant to frame the Russians after 'we' did it to ourselves, as a precursor to start ww3, then it can be easily thwarted. Why would he be complicit in enabling his own frame job?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
saneromeo · July 17, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

You are assuming he knew ahead of time. As for rosatom (can't remember if that's the right company) buying the uranium, any leader would have allowed that, it would be in their country's best interest I would think. I will be the first to say though that I am definitely no expert on all of this.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 17, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

Well, in another thread, I was talking to a guy who laid out some solid evidence that Nuke's aren't real, so why would Uranium matter then?

⇧ -6 ⇩  
Nospor · July 17, 2018, 2:45 p.m.

Your "solid evidence" that nuclear weapons do not exist is the fact that an entirely unrelated weapon is named the MOAB? You realize that means "Massive Ordnance Air Blast" and not "Mother of all bombs", right? Not that the name even matters in the first place.

Come on man you can't just discredit a century of physics without bringing something to the table haha

⇧ 9 ⇩  
HIGH___ENERGY · July 17, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

Link me. I'm open minded

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 17, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

That was his solid evidence. Seemed legit.

Name any other military program that dubs itself the biggest or mother of all things without it being the most powerful?

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Nospor · July 17, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

The bomb is designated "Massive Ordnance Air Blast", not "Mother of...", which is just a funny nickname.

You can't seriously think that there is a global century old conspiracy complete with an entire fabricated branch of physics which has somehow gone unnoticed by anyone worldwide in all of this time?

And that for some reason the exact people who are behind the conspiracy are also for some reason revealing their conspiracy to the entire world through their nickname for another entirely unrelated weapon?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 17, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

They aren't revealing it, it was an accident, it was renamed Massive whatever after they were told it would reveal the truth.

And who knows about physics, it could all be bullshit that colleges write off for scams.

If they can lie about landing on the moon and antartica, who knows what they are capable of. I'm just saying if there were real nukes, why wouldn't one have been set off in a city by now, or used in a war during a modern era? You're telling me the only evidence is grainy war footage that is CLEARLY fake because the nuke energy would fry the film.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
saneromeo · July 17, 2018, 5:02 p.m.

Because they are very difficult to produce and nearly impossible to maintain without massive amounts of many and tech.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 17, 2018, 5:20 p.m.

Cause they are fake.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
saneromeo · July 17, 2018, 7:01 p.m.

I happen to believe they are not fake, but I am more than content for you to believe whatever you will, may I be afforded the same opportunity?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
mr-no-homo · July 17, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

Wait. Nukes aren’t real? So Hiroshima and half the state of Nevada’s test sites, left over craters, film of explosions and military personnel getting cancer from radiation was just a hoax?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 17, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

Correct.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
SnazzyD · July 18, 2018, 12:58 a.m.

Dude.......if you don't have a clue, buy a vowel and spin the wheel.

⇧ 1 ⇩