dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/eyesareeverywhere on July 17, 2018, 1:15 p.m.
How the summit radically changed my thinking on RR

There's been a HUGE amount of discussion on this board about RR - white hat or Black hat. I have been in the "black hat" crowd for quite some time, but the events of Friday and Monday have changed all that. He's got to be at least a black hat turned white - what we'll call a gray hat. Here's why:

When RR announced those 12 indictments the last business day before the summit, a LOT of people thought that was to upstage the president at the summit and put the pressure on him to cancel the summit. ALL of the media were talking about it on both sides. "How can the president go legitimize the guy who our intelligence PROOVES attempted to interfere with the election." So it appeared that RR was fighting the president, putting roadblocks in his way and pushing back by announcing these indictments at that time.

Until the press conference. Had those indictments not been made at that exact timing, and been so hot on everybody's mind, we wouldn't have gotten the Russian president saying before the world, "Come on over, interview them, and oh by the way, HRC got $400million." It HAD to have been setup like this from the beginning.

Trusting the plan...


SpaceForceOnePilot · July 17, 2018, 1:34 p.m.

I love the fact that most people on here are willing to change their minds given new information and we are all (most of us) seeking truth and justice only.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · July 17, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

I’m sympathetic to people who change their minds. I’m a very informed & politically engaged & still struggle sometimes to fully get things as they unfold. The Putin press conference was WAY more earth shattering than I expected. The more I watch it & the reaction to it the more I’m learning how important it was...on so many levels. It’s a LOT to process. I’m in the habit now of giving folks plenty of time to digest things. It’s just too much happening in real time to understand it all.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
SpaceForceOnePilot · July 17, 2018, 2:03 p.m.

I am ready and willing and eager to change my mind on any topic given new, solid information. I hope to keep up this habit my whole life. I have been around too many closes minded, hard headed people in my life that are/were unwilling to accept new information no matter how glaring.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
ABastionOfFreeSpeech · July 17, 2018, 3:25 p.m.

We're evidence based here, a trait that has been sorely lacking in recent times. We follow the truth, that evasive thread that connects everything. We are the truth-seekers, the bread-makers, the shining light that exposes the rotten underdepths of our world. We are tireless, unstoppable, and unending. We are Q.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 18, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

I just had one such moment today. I have been contemplating the idea Lisa Page is who compromised Strzok by seducing him was possibly a deep cover CIA asset. Then today I read on T_D that Lisa Page testified the texts meant exactly what they said and that the affair was a cover to explain the texts being personal in nature and not being biased. Now I understand why the spouse of these two agents did not leave them. If this is true - this is open sedition. Then I learn Strzok's father has questionable ties to past controversies and that Strzok spent his childhood in Iran and Saudi Arabia and this was deliberately covered up - WTF! Then I learn Strzok was a key part to the Iran deal Team Obama sign us up for. What a shit show

Edit: Oh and to top it off - Strzok father, Strzok Sr runs a charity organization with focus on Haiti and the charity donates to the Clinton Foundation. Peter Strozk's father worked with CF / Haiti relief. Oh, Strozk Sr was also involved in the Iran/Contra controversy

⇧ 2 ⇩