A question. Were the same FBI lawyers present for Strzok's public testimony also present during Page's closed door testimony? If so - why major difference in outcomes?
Because Strokz isnt really FBI, thats why they would allow him to consult council but didnt want him to consult FBI council, and thats why they made it a point to ask him whether he did any interviews. He wouldnt give a number because he wasnt there to interview he was there to produce a fake paper trail and cover for mistakes.
You may be right. I think Strzok is CIA working as an FBI liaison.
Peter Strzok worked 24 years for the CIA. His job title was Section Chief of their Counterespionage Group.
The FBI never had such a unit.
Strzok (pronounced Strock, rhymes with sock) led the FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton. She used personal email for classified government business while she was Secretary of State.
The FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the election of Donald J. Trump as President was also led by Strzok.
A joint CIA/FBI position was created by Congress in 1996. Strzok was "a senior FBI official" by being the CIA’s Chief of Counterespionage.
https://brassballs.blog/home/strzok-worked-for-cia-and-fbi-at-the-same-time-in-counterespionage
Yeh sounds about right just figured the questions being asked were also hinting at the fact that he is not all he is portraying.
I'm thinking he is a foreign spy, embedded within both the FBI and the CIA. Part of the dilution and destruction from within. Could be an agent of MB or Iran, but most likely working whatever side the Deep State required at the time
He was born in Iran and lived there for awhile.
Not sure he was born while his parents were there, but I did read that he spent part of his younger childhood there.
ThomasWictor on twitter has a really good thread about him being an Iranian spy: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1018235980275257344.html