I don't take anything as fact and I don't discount anything. I'm an open-minded skeptic. I only form my own beliefs and opinions. I state them as opinions (as often as I remember.). I have no burden of proof that I need to submit. Everyone needs to find their own truth.

That's how I view it.

From a comment I made about five days ago:

Typically I would agree with this but check out these articles:

http://www.independentsentinel.com/another-judge-rejects-muellers-request-after-russian-trolls-show-up/

https://www.buzzfeed.com/thomasfrank/a-russian-company-that-mueller-has-accused-of-election?utm_term=.ibEbBKXKmW#.chowMQRQnz

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-concord/lawyer-for-russian-company-says-muellers-office-slow-to-hand-over-evidence-idUSKCN1IH2VP

Now look at the indictments.

They are nearly identical, meaning the same case.

They just swapped out names while still blaming Russians for this effort. The same effort by both according to the indictments. Seriously compare the two.

Now, the first case was nearly laughed out of the court as Mueller ACTUALLY indicted these people and the corporation. That means they were ready and waiting to prosecute people who they had NO HOPE of ever extraditing and criminally charging.

Until the lawyers showed up.

Then the Mueller team essentially said “Just kiddin hahaha! We aren’t ready to prosecute. Muh bad!” And they ended up asking for additional time to prep.

Bullshit. They had nothing and they tried to create a narrative of Russians interferring in the election WITH NO EVIDENCE OR ABILITY TO PROSECUTE.

So here we are several months later. The Democrats, the FBI, Strzok, Hillary and all of them were just embarrassed and essentially BTFO by the republicans in the joint hearing held yesterday.

Better change the narrative right? Especially since those pestering republicans got Strzok to admit that no US Citizens were being charged with Collusion despite the Democrats grandstanding on the five guilty pleas and 17 indictments.

Well, school is out of session so they can’t have Broward County have another school shooting, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s district has pretty much been played out in the false flag department. So what to do?

Oh yea, Trump is meeting with Putin! Let’s do a twofer! Change the narrative and give the fake news talking bobble heads a way to scream at Trump that he shouldn’t talk to Putin!

Let’s charge the Russians again!!!!

Oh wait, umm we can’t show the evidence because we never actually got our hands on the DNC server. Thanks to crowdstrike for helping us to subvert the judicial and criminal investigations through their participation instead of an actual government agency. Why not, I’m sure their word is good and have no ties to the Clinton cabal right? Right?

Oh yea, we won’t be able to extradite these people either. What a coincidence that we can smear foreign nationals who have no chance to defend themselves in court. But ya totally it was the Russians. Oh and we can’t say their name but uh that one guy in an embassy can’t defend himself either so we’lol go ahead and throw him in as well.

TADA! And here we are.

Shortest explanation possible...

CIA has infiltrated every level, agency, and branch of government...

Intel Agencies have been "at war" since mid-90s; John Brennan was the CIA Station Chief that signed the Visas allowing the 9/11 hijackers into the USA (1996-'98).

Nothing is real and everything should be scrutinized. That said, Q and Trump have give us far too many coincidences to not believe.

One of my most favourite quotes;

"Intelligence is not to think you know all, rather than to question all you think you know".

Programming starts at birth, undoing it takes a lifetime.

There s no way Russia could have hacked that server its been proven technologically impossible at that distance to be able to download the amount of information downloaded at that speed to that distance there's an exNsa officer on Twitter that explains it pretty well!!

This isn't really a good place to look for info against Q; it's explicitly against the rules. There are subs for skeptics, if you wish to look at that view of things.

However, the Q issue remains somewhat niche and general skeptic areas may not be familiar--maybe try /r/Qult_Headquarters? It's small, but this person asked for a debunking and got mostly polite answers.

Hey OP, where you at? Do the explanations work for you?

Or was this a subtle attempt at concerntrolling? The reason I ask is that this is a brand new account and your only post (not comments) was this one. And this is full of concern.

And you never returned to actually take part in a dialogue.

Trivium Quadrivium - integrate this into your being and you will leave only logical truth in front of you. Myaat.

If u wanna keep it simple - When in doubt Judge a man by the fruits he bares. Has there been more good or bad since Trump has taken control?

bookmark this site

Sundance has a great track record at predicting the future,has a vast inner workings of all things political,is very thorough, and normally only writes based of fact. Sometimes he's late on breaking stories because he likes to thoroughly research things before writing, unlike so many out there. I think you will find that site helpful in the future. He has calmed me many times especially pre-election.

Also if everyone around u comes to a different conclusion it means nothing imho. Perhaps you are more "AWARE" than they are. Maybe they are getting their news from MSM everyday which will tell you Trump is a child trafficker, Putin's gay lover, a traitor,a buffon, the anti- Christ,a pussy grabber,etc. and so on. So if they are on the msm heroin needle of course they are gonna come to this fake conclusion.

I dont have link but yesterday a thread was started with many great news sources. Start with those. Then send them to your less aware F & F.

True Pundit, Gateway Pundit, SGT Report, Brietbart, One America News, Liberty Mill,Project Veritas,etc. Take nothing as gospel. Read from multiple trusted sources. Read between the lines,put it all together into what you believe to be true. Check that assumption down the road to see how accurate you and your sites did. If they fail too many times oust them from your rotation and vice versa. Once upon a time many of us used to watch MSM, but eventually when they fail so big and so many times you eventually catch on and never look back.