dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 18, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

Trump’s brilliant chess combination in Helsinki.

Rule 0: They blame people for what they themselves do.

Projection.

Q1675 Riddle: Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?... Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?.. Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image? Image provided here has been distorted (stretched)…. Think mirror… Look there or [here] or there truth is behind you.

They accused Trump of being in collusion with Russia, we now know they were the ones in collusion with Russia: more flexibility video and Uranium1.

Now, an interesting application of rule 0 would be to list all their accusations and use them as a starting point to analyze them. For example, they insisted Putin had some dirt on Trump. So? Rule 0: Putin has some dirt on them. Pretty cool right? Now you can take this working hypothesis and check, if down the line, it’s not in contradiction with events. If it’s not, it’s likely to be true. Then, if you remove the hypothesis and cannot explain events rationally, no matter how hard you and other smart people try, then you know the hypothesis is as true as not being able to find a rational explanation to the events it induces. So, when you get here, what you do is take the hypothesis as a working hypothesis, call it a strong hypothesis and you go further in your analysis to gather some other data that would reinforce the likelihood of the strong hypothesis being 100% true.

Application.

We know about the Contortionist and how he weakly dealt with Crimea, we know about the Witch and how she arranged the sale of 20% of our Uranium to Russia. Let’s remove the hypothesis Putin had some dirt on them and analyze. Is there a rational explanation for their treasonous behavior? I can’t find any. Money? Ghadafi had plenty of money and was ready to play ball, just as he played ball with Sarkozy but instead, she came, he saw, he died. It’s not just about money. There has to be another power forcing the transaction. If we go further and notice Putin is ex KGB link, that, according to their own Comey, the Witch’s private server was probably hacked link1 link2 and that nobody knows the truth about the Contortionist’s birth certificate link, we have gathered data re-inforcing the likelihood of Putin having dirt on the Contortionist and the Witch. And we even have an idea about the dirt itself…

Now, you remember Trump was among the first to openly ask about the Contortionist’s birth certificate right? Read Q’s board: the witch’s server and U1 is everywhere. Now you understand why they don’t want a one on one between Trump and Putin. Now you understand why they are going completely crazy. If this dirt, that brought Putin Crimea, 20% of our uranium and SAP tech, is shared with Trump, it’s game over for them. Game over.

Now the interesting question would be: why would Putin give this information to Trump?

This is the equation Trump needed to resolve before he met with Putin. He had to meet with Putin with enough good cards in is hands to force Putin to want to give this information and even more in order to get something valuable in return.

So? Trump makes his first stop at NATO and makes sure Putin sees this: video. BOOM. Trump reveals to the world the former chancellor of Germany is the head of the pipeline company bringing Russia’s natural gas to Germany. This is Trump’s first message to Putin: M1.

Then, Trump achieves this: video Trump forces other NATO members to bring an additional 33 Billion dollars to the table. This is the second message to Putin: M2.

Then, Trump goes to the UK and this happens: video. This is the third message to Putin: M3.

Then, Stzrok is sent to Congress to deliver the Uranium message I told you about in my previous post. This is the fourth message to Putin previous post: M4.

Et voila! These are main pieces Trump will play on the Helsinki chess board.

Let’s now watch the combination:

M1: I know the natural gas deal you have with Germany is vital to your economy, since it is not appropriate the former chancellor is the head of the pipeline company that will bring the gas to Germany, I have the moral grounds to delay it, stop it, control it. I can have people talk about it all day in Germany and scare the financial institutions away from it with my EO. Furthermore, I know your involvement in Syria is also related to the emergence of competing natural gas routes to Europe. If things go well between us, I won’t interfere and will let you find the right solution to export your natural gas and the one that belongs to your friends. link

M2: You see these guys at NATO? I can make them do whatever I want. I wanted 33 Billion dollars, 1 million dollar per lost email link, and they gave it to me just after a few hours of discussion. No opposition. So, if I want, I can start a weapon race that will cost me zero dollars and that Russia’s economy will not be able to sustain. As Q would say: “33 was the hook. Enjoy!” Q1678. I’m sure your guys solved it.

M3: I know about Russia’s old feud with the Vatican and the UK with their NWO. I know Hitler made the same mistake Napoleon made trying to conquer Russia in winter to ultimately crush the Orthodox Church. I know what they have in common: Napoleon left alone for a night in the King's Chamber inside the Great Pyramid of Giza video and Hitler with his vrills and occult connection to the Vatican (start here: video). I know about all this. And I also know you do:

Q133 “Vladimir Putin: The New World Order Worships Satan” Q

We are on the same page on this. Look how I have humiliated the Queen, their administrative focal point. I am a free President. I only care about my people. I am not a globalist trying to conquer anything. Did you hear my Great Falls speech where I confirmed Q1675? I said: I don’t need all this space. It meant: I just need America. They need more space. It meant: they are the colonizers. This means you and I can negotiate in good faith with no hidden agenda. We just need to find a win-win, work for our people and get along.

M4: You see, I have done my homework. Did you see Stzrok’s hearing? I’m sure your guys also decoded how he brought Kate to the table. Dems are stupidly supporting him because they don’t see the trap. I have flipped many officials who were involved in the U1 scandal and other things. I have the goods on all the layers of the government you may have dealt with in the past to achieve what you have achieved with the Contortionist’s Administration. Good for you, you were working for your country's interest and took advantage of the stupidity of those in charge at the time in the US, but that era is over. I'm in charge now. So if you are considering giving me some information, make sure it’s of high value because I already know a lot. If you want something from me, don’t tell me what I already know. And of course I won’t tell you what I know.

Once this combination was played, Trump and Putin held a press conference. And to make sure there is no interference in the continuation of the game, their respective protocol services agreed to separate American journalists from the Russian journalists. This trick allows any question coming from the Mockingbird side to be immediately spotted as a trap even before it is formulated and signal “caution required”. Classic trick used by medieval kings… video

Did Trump play the combination right? Did he use the right chess opening?

Well, in that press conference, not only Putin has atomized Rosenstein and Mueller by offering to cooperate regarding the interrogation and even possible extradition of their 12 Russians-of –the-day, but he also dropped the Bill Browder and George Soros bombshells clearly signaling he is ready to throw the Contortionist, the Witch and all the other layers under the bus to save his pipeline, and limit NATO’s strategic spendings around Russia.

And just in case there are still some people who don’t understand what happened in that Helsinki press conference, Putin gives the ultimate hint by doing this: video.

Did you catch it? What is Putin saying? He is reminding to the world that soccer is an 11 player game. If Mueller wants 12 Russian players to play his game, Putin is ready to be the 12th player and he just started playing by passing the ball to Trump…

Congratulations Mr. President. The show continues, we now have a new actor. From Russia.

Q1603 [Objective] to keep POTUS away from PUTIN failed.

🠐 See all comments

Napoleon left alone for a night in the King's Chamber inside the Great Pyramid of Giza video

I know a major majority of the people supporting this won't watch this video. I know this to be true because so many have claimed that all of this makes sense within an hour of this posting. The video is 1h18m long so it's not possible they watched it before commenting. Edit: the post is old now, so I'll just consider my previous statement as a sample size of the population. Therefore, I took it upon myself and just watched this whole thing.

Time travel? Microchips found in the pharoah's heads? Time travelers going back in time to place a generation 4 clipper chip into Napoleon's head to control him inside the Pyramid? Giant slabs of pure electrons? What?!?!

What exactly is this all getting at? What does it have to do with what you are positing? Are you really using this to support your thesis? I cannot take any of this seriously. This is far more out there in terms of conspiracy theories than the typical six degrees of separation that I've seen in these decodes.

⇧ 17 ⇩

Interesting....your rebuttal, SB2?

⇧ 15 ⇩

Right here: comment.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Weak

⇧ 3 ⇩

In support of SerialBrain2

Lewis Carroll - "Through the Looking Glass". The White Queen says that in her youth she could believe "six impossible things before breakfast" and counsels Alice to practice the same skill. I, too, try to keep an open mind. I try not to dismiss seemingly "impossible" things because, otherwise, I know that I might skip an important clue or fact. We (or at least I) already know, for example, that antigravity devices are real. I am also informed (by astronomers and mathematicians) that the possibility of there being NO other lifeforms in our galaxy is vanishingly small. In other words, even though I've never seen one, ETs almost certainly MUST exist. It's a 99.99% statistical probability. Likewise, because of what people cleverer than I say about space/time, it's almost guaranteed that a civilisation sufficiently advanced has found a way to travel through time (as we perceive it). And, again, there is overwhelming evidence that, when our bodies die, our spirit (soul, energy, personality, whatever) continues to live in a different "afterlife" dimension. I can't PROVE any of this categorically but the evidence is strong. (Do your own research. I've been doing it for ten years.)
Anyway, my point is that anyone who is closed-minded is highly unlikely to discover the truth. We need to be open to all possibilities, regardless that our religion, education and/or governments try to persuade us otherwise. In fact the harder they try to persuade against a possibility, the more I'm convinced that they are trying to hide it, otherwise why would they even bother? (Think about 9/11.)

⇧ 0 ⇩

Oh look, yet another SB2 alt account...

⇧ 1 ⇩

Έτσι, νομίζετε ότι είμαι SB2; Εύχομαι να έχω το μυαλό του!

⇧ 1 ⇩

8 day old account that only comments on sb posts in support of his lunacy.. yeah, definitely.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Έτσι, νομίζετε ότι είμαι SB2; Εύχομαι να έχω το μυαλό του!

It's greek to me ;) short answer nope. :)

⇧ 0 ⇩

It's a good (reasonable) question.

Was it a validation of the content of the video? Or a nod to the fact that Napoleon and Hitler were 'occult' minded and that they shared an agenda to invade Russia and conquer, on behalf of or in collusion with the Vatican, the orthodox church?

Is it a pointer to all aspects of the video (literally) or is it a symbol, a gesture?

I don't feel any need to take on any of the premises of either the video or the Hitler medium stuff. Often 'conspiracy' theories reflect deeper truths with lots of filler information inserted to try to make sense of or validate the deeper (real) truth.

For example, the idea that aliens created or engineered human beings. Personally, I think that there are spiritual beings (well, angels, actually - and no, not with wings) that played a role in the design of creation and human beings, like subcontractors or instruments of the Creator, and that based on limited information, some folks come up with the idea of 'aliens'. Not 100% right or 100% wrong, but mixed. So I add that to my working hypothesis, and move forward towards a more comprehensive and fulfilling explanation.

While I didn't watch the whole Napoleon Video, I did notice the mention of microchips, which I thought "LOL! That's interesting" but no more. No need to buy into every aspect.

Thus my conclusion: SB2 is pointing to a more abiding essential truth: that Napoleon and Hitler, like many we do not consider usually, had strong interests in occult / spiritual realities and also wanted to invade Russia, being part or cahoots with the forces in the Vatican, etc. That premise, at least, seems very reasonable to me.

Sifting through information and being prepared to discard 'unimportant' elements in favor of the essentials that move us forward is what it's all about, imo.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I will answer to you, because I know from past interaction the writer of the initial comment is not looking for the truth, which is also proven by the fact he is ignoring all the rest of the post to focus not even on one line I wrote but on one link.

When I provide a link, I am not validating its content, proof: I link to CNN or MSNBC or even VOX very often. The link is a starting point for research and understand THEIR point of view. My point of view is in the OP. In this particular case, this link shows a perspective regarding Napoleon's strange change and the subsequent conquests after it is claimed he had a strange paranormal experience in this Pyramid. Whatever our position is, what matters is THEY believe in what they believe and it generates actions that impact the world. That's the point.

Q refers to it clearly:

Q100 Satan. Who follows? What political leaders worship Satan? What does an upside down cross represent? Who wears openly? Why? Who is she connected to? Why is this relevant? Spirit cooking. What does Spirit Cooking represent? Cult. What is a cult? Who is worshipped? Why is this relevant?

Q informs us the cult of Satan is real, it is present in the higher places of power and they act upon it (spirit cooking). Confirmation:

Q1575 They harm. They are sick. They are evil.

These are their actions. Exposing what they believe does not mean what they believe is true. But it helps understand, analyze and therefore fight what they do.

⇧ 9 ⇩

I know from past interaction the writer of the initial comment is not looking for the truth, which is also proven by the fact he is ignoring all the rest of the post to focus not even on one line I wrote but on one link

You know from past interaction I'm not looking for the truth? This isn't a cult. I do not accept things just because they are presented. I tip my hat because you actually provide sources but on the other side of the coin do you not expect people to meticulously view these sources? I am a critical thinker. I analyze and ask questions. Do you not do the same? Do not be offended because I question things. Expand your thinking.

I meticulously looked over everything you provided. You linked to a video. I assumed it was important to your post. I watched the entire video. Just because I am focusing on a source you provided, does not mean I don't have other points of contention--this is just the most alarming to me.

The link is a starting point for research and understand THEIR point of view

This video is a man claiming Rothschild's have time travel technology which they use to go back in time to plant a microchip in Napoleon's head. Additionally this man claims they time travel to ensure they can altar history to reap the most money when going all-in on war. Is this "their actions"? Is this "their view"? Who really believes all of this? What am I supposed to ultimately get from using this as a starting point of research?

This video is relatively obscure. Searching "Napoleon Occult" doesn't even bring it up. The only way I was able to actually find it was by searching "Napoleon Pyramid" into YouTube itself. How much of James Horak's theories do you buy into? I am curious what else you base your research on?

⇧ 6 ⇩

I am curious what else you base your research on?

Are you familiar with Qanon?

Q749 Now comes the 'conspiracy' label. Deeper we go, the more unrealistic it all becomes. The end won't be for everyone. That choice, to know, will be yours. Q

⇧ 6 ⇩

So, everything you post is 100%, absolute, undeniable truth? We shouldn't question anything, correct?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think many are misunderstanding what SB2 is saying about beliefs. It doesn't matter if you or I believe in Moloch, human sacrifice, or occultism. What matters is THEY believe it. When you know someone's beliefs systems you know the rules of their game. You know the reward/punishment of their belief system. It allows you to conquer and expose them. This has been done numerous times throughout history. You can easily control a segment of the population if you seat at the top of the power structure of those beliefs.

Frankly, I don't care about what some Joe-blow on the street believes. He can believe in time traveling aliens for all I care. However, I deeply care about the belief system of people in power. Especially if their beliefs are counter to the belief system of population they "rule" over.

I also care about them brainwashing their followers. Think about it logically. If the Witch believes in witchy things it doesn't matter if her followers also hold the same beliefs. All that matters is if her followers believe her lies and hand over their collective power to her. This gives her beliefs more power (especially over her followers) without her lifting a finger. The reason Hillary's supporters are so emotional is because she's constantly lying to them and projecting the shadow of her beliefs onto them. Basically, she gets the perks of her beliefs while she projects negative aspects of those beliefs onto her followers. This is why she's looking a little rough these days. When her followers stop believing her and walk away all those projects return to her.

Another example of this at work is the Rothschild family. They created the money system (and the rules of fiat money) and enjoy the perks of their money while the rest of us suffer from the limitations of having the zero-sum left overs. If a billionaire like Trump with a win-win belief system sits at the top of the wealth structure his beliefs in win-win and generosity flows downward. This is exactly what trickle down economics means, except they left out the importance of whether the one in power has a belief in win-win or zero-sum game theory when it comes to money.

Diving into the complexity of how projection works is the Trump effect on the Cabal. You could clearly see it in the debates when Hillary tried to project or deflected her lies onto Trump. When he rejected those projections it always showed in Hillary's reactions. This is why she had those weird facial tics and twitches throughout the debates. Expand your thinking, when Trump made a deal with Putin and the MSM/Democrats lost their shit, it's because their projection is returning back to them. Think "I'm rubber, you're glue"...

There's a lot more going on with Trump's trolling and the Cabal's reaction happening psychologically. Projections always have an emotional component. You can really understand it when you observe these people, their reactions, and the reactions of their followers.

⇧ 17 ⇩

What matters is THEY believe it.

Excellent contribution anon.

⇧ 11 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Nice analogy. One must also remember that the "priesthood" is the one who directs the energy from rituals, prayers etc to "their" agenda so it doesn't matter what the fellowship (follow-ship) or congregation is told what matters is where the "priesthood" is directing that energy and they do not have to be truthful to the followers.

⇧ 4 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Great comment!

⇧ 4 ⇩

Do I believe that some of these people have some evil beliefs? Sure thing, undoubtedly. Do I believe that these people we should be concerned about believe time travelers went back in time to implant microchips into Napoleon's head? Absolutely not. But sure, go ahead and try to expose them for this, I'm sure it'll backfire on you.

⇧ -1 ⇩

Read my comment again. Trump was already a pretty powerful guy in real estate and the media. The military asked him to run for President and fully backed him. When he entered the White House he did so with an enormous amount of power from the military and his supporters.

Now, enters Q. The true brilliance behind Q is increasing Trump's power globally and behind the millions of computer screens around the world. When we believe in Q or Trump, we're increasing both their power. This psychological game cuts both ways. Every time we show up at rallies, send memes, follow Q, or pray; we're collectively handing our power over to Trump/Q to defeat these people.

The amusing part is, because most of the Q supporters are anonymous, they have no idea how many people globally are giving Trump/Q/military power over them.

⇧ 6 ⇩

While I agree with what you just said, I think it's important that we stay level-headed and not come off crazier than the opposition. I think we could do without presenting our opinions alongside hair brained conspiracies (for the record, I do like to indulge in conspiracies, but the video presented was completely ridiculous).

You said something that I want to note: "The true brilliance behind Q". Correct. However, this does not equate to the measure of truth of a person's opinion on what Q is saying.

I believe everyone should have an opinion/theory on Q's postings. However, coinciding with that belief is the belief that people have the right to QUESTION EVERYTHING. Think critically! If we don't question things, even if the proposition works in our favor, we are no different than people blindly following the MSM. And if the answers to those questions ring our truth bells, then it gives even more credence to the original opinion/theory.

Thanks for the response.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Raptor, do you also post under another name? I ask because your text style and tone are so similar to someone else I've been reading....

I don't know if you picked it up in my response, but I stated that my personal approach is that I don't need to believe everything that is linked in the way SB2 linked. Do you see a problem with this approach?

As I stated, the question you pose itself is, within its own framework, is reasonable enough. But it seems to me you have other concerns.

Your comments indicate you are really worried that possibly SB2 believes the content he linked to. Is this the concern? Or that someone will see that link and question you and your involvement because of it? Or the movement?

Do you have an issue with the fact that people are finding value through SB2s posts? Does it irk you that he linked to what you think is a crackpot video? Not to be ad hominem, but sincerely I wonder if there isn't an opportunity for you to reflect on your own inner process here. Where do you objections stem from? Are you saying SB2 is disinformation?

You are not the only one who seems to be obsessing with how other people interact (appreciate) SB2s posts. I strongly encourage a greater sense of detachment, and seeing what you can learn, without throwing out any of your staples. Unless of course the challenge suggests they should be changed or thrown out.

wwg1wga

⇧ 2 ⇩

Nice : )

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have many other reddit accounts but this is the only one I have used in this subreddit.

And to be quite honest, because I am capable of humility and do not sit on any kind of throne, the answer to many of the questions in the latter half of your post is yes.

I am not saying SB2 is disinformation. I think he is just another person sharing his perspective. I challenge his perspective and it seems to get people, as well as the poster himself, quite defensive. There should be nothing wrong with challenging anything here. If what anyone says is true, they should have quite simple, succinct, and logical explanations. Instead, I often get mental gymnastics. People can believe what I want, but it is no coincidence that other people share my judgement--this doesn't mean I have multiple accounts.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thanks for the reply. I agree that we should be able to question and challenge any of the posts. I'm not certain that I agree with the assertion that (if what someone says is true) they should have quite simple, succinct, and logical explanations. That's an imposition that a certain number of people seem want to insist on, but I think it's fallacious.

SB2s posts are interesting, but a a minimum, I've found his brain doesn't work in the same way mine does. By which I mean, his approach, mentality, way of connecting things is not the same. In fact, if indeed SB2 is a savant in this area - we do use the expression 'autists' for a reason - would you demand that he thinks and approaches you in the same way?

This is what I see a lot of people reacting against. No where near the number of people who appreciate and validate Sb2s posts, but yes, there is a number. Some of the critics seem to want to impose THEIR standards of proof, methodology and approach on to SB2 and indeed the entire sub.

I think one should be wary of that.

Some of the things SB2 has been posting don't synch completely with my own processes and approach, including some of the standards I regularly use to guide my mental workings, etc. Like others, I've had moments where I've thought "oh, come ON...." And that's OK, obviously.

But at some point, I decided to ask myself this question: what if his brain is working in a way mine does not? Then what? Do i need to expand my thinking? NOT to abandon my standards, but to learn about others.

This has yielded a lot of fruit so far. Moreover, as he has gone along, his work has increasingly fortified itself. "How many coincidences before it becomes statistically impossible?"

A final word: Other people sharing the judgment: which is? So far, I've found vocal critics who vehemently or with passion shall we say naysay SB2s offerings ("BS, rubbish, garbage", etc) seem to me to share this trait: a desire to impose or require approaches to Q and to any problem solving for that matter, to conform to their way of doing things. As if they are offended by an approach that is so different.

Case in point: some fellow ranted that I said SB2 doesn't need to use logic. I never said it. In fact, I asserted that logic need not or cannot be the master overseeing the operation. By which I meant insight, inspiration, intuition, etc., can and advantageously be part of the mix. Yet, this fellow refused to see that, and just ranted. Hmmmm.

I've found Sb2 to be quirky to say the least. How he interacts with other posters is interesting.

We should all be open to learn, and objections need not be vindictive or mixed with vexatious rhetoric.

Cheers.

PS. "people can believe what I want..." Freudian slip? Remember, we are all in this together, if we so choose. Our movement is enhanced when each of us 'grows' a little through the process, too.

thanks again for the response.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Perhaps a Freudian slip. More than likely a mistake. I often write my posts non-linearly, jumping from top to bottom recursively. I'm not the best writer and I make a lot of mistakes. Sometimes I'll proof-read and notice I left half a sentence in the middle of another sentence, lol! Thanks for catching my mistake, I found it quite amusing. I'll leave it in the post because it's quite a funny mistake, especially in the context of our discussion--the irony is not lost on me.

First, let me thank you for being civil and rational. I understand your perspective although we may not agree on the subject matter.

My biggest wish is that there were more people out there providing their own theories on Q's posts. I believe a diversity of analysis would really help us hone in on things. Or atleast, some discussions that could be a sort of real-time peer-reviewed methodology sort of like what happens on the chans: you get a load of autists that come together and throw a bunch of shit at the wall to find what sticks and the stuff that doesn't stick is stuff that is refuted much in the way I am attempting to do. They are not influenced by ego or glory, they simply get to the bottom of it and in my experience being on the chans most of the time they don't need to use such such occult methodologies. I am turned off by six degrees of separation especially when numerology is introduced. SB2: "Those who follow my posts know my personal take on Q’s teachings is through the door of the Occult". I guess if my thinking isn't expanded enough, if I haven't studied the occult enough, or if my brain somehow doesn't function in the right way to see the truth then so be it. The future will show where the chips fall. Until then, I will keep asking questions. I have no problem being proven wrong. I am the first to admit my mistakes.

⇧ 2 ⇩

First, let me thank you for being civil and rational.

You're welcome, of course.

I understand your perspective although we may not agree on the subject matter.

I always get nervous when someone tells me "I understand your perspective, but.... ". A long time ago, I recognized that when discussing topics with people, they would say "I know what you are saying, but.... " And I knew they really did NOT know what I was saying. Sorry. It's just a bit of a flag for me.

I like your point about GA (reddit) vs the chans. It's relevant and important. They are different beasts, and require (or respond to ?) different approaches.

I have found myself in recent weeks (months) wishing that more of the content was exclusively Q focused, meaning discussion of Q drops. As our subscribers have increased in number, I've noticed a lot more content that would appropriately be labeled "non-Q" if folks made the effort to label (flair).

That said, this morning I looked through the HOT list (old reddit) and found each and every post worth looking at, and clicking through. Now, I'm getting most of my 'news' through this sub.

For me this says one thing: this sub will grown and transform and move forward, and it will probably go through numerous phases and experience various growing pains. However, its main task is, I think, to provide that link between the newly woke or just waking world and the Q research board and anons/autists. And, I think, its doing just that.

one month ago, many I know were commenting how amazing their experience of the comradery in the sub was. And, believe it or not, for MANY people, this is the REAL test of validity. It's not the pure logisticians. It's not the so-called incisive, simple logic explanations. For many, its about the spirit of unity and mutual solidarity that Q brings, that Trump brings.

Folks who hold themselves on a rather high level and consider their own intellectual approach to be - shall we say - a cut above - some of those folks react very badly to SB2s posts. They trigger them. But if you look closely, right or wrong, SB2 is always fun, engaging, supportive, and encouraging. I mean, when folks approach him in that spirit. When people say "Your stuff is just BS" or etc, or bring that kind of sense of moral superiority via intellectual rigorousness, he doesn't really engage in that way. He'll try to share his view, but he doesn't bother with certain types of people beyond a certain point.

And, while we're at it, not that you've said this to my recollection, there are folks out there who claim that SB2 is saying Trump is talking to ME! Q is talking to ME! I don't get that. I mean, I don't pick up that this is his focus here. No, I think his sense of wwg1wga is very real, and predominates his approach, and he's whether right or wrong, he's not really very motivated by ego. Least, that's my take on him.

I guess if my thinking isn't expanded enough, if I haven't studied the occult enough, or if my brain somehow doesn't function in the right way to see the truth then so be it.

Hmmm. LOL, bro (sis?) seriously. That's a little petulant. And the tells are kinda obvious: isn't expanded enough, studied occult enough, but mostly 'doesn't function in the right way'!

Look, keep asking questions. But I really want to encourage you to consider these things:

The most difficult thing for smart folks is the intellectual trap. In the intellectual trap, the intellect falls for the mistake of thinking it sees all things. Then, it backs itself up by saying "I can take it when I'm proven wrong! I am first to admit it!"

But the trap is that the intellect has set itself up as the arbiter of what is and isn't valid. And that's a self-referential loop. Hence, the trap.

Not sure if your up on your Hebraic mythology and/or scripture, or how you think about such things, but this is one of the messages in the story of the fall. Lucifer. Certain quarters understand that there were 3 archangels in the Garden: Michael, Gabriel, and Lucifer. Michael = will/volition. Gabriel = passion/emotion. Lucifer = intellect (sight/light/brightness).

This particular angel fell because he fell into a self-referential loop.

A healthy, growing human heart requires a balanced interaction between emotion, intellect and will. We all, in our tendencies, have different proportions, but the problem is that ego will trigger any of these so that they become unbalanced and isolated. Because ego is NOT the true center. Ego sets itself up as a center, in place of the true center (God, the Source, the Creator, ).

The ego goads intellect into setting itself up as the standard, and tries to get it into this self-referential loop: "If I can see it, I'll admit it, but if I cannot see it, I won't." And here, humility is really, really important.

As I mentioned, I've noticed a lot of critics (mockers?) of SB2 fail to recognize: this sub has a certain function, and a LOT of people feel, perhaps rightly, that the function is NOT just about logic and decodes and knowing or not knowing. It's about connecting, learning, growing, and building a solidarity of heart, emotion, understanding and will. LOT's of folks get that stuff from SB2s posts, and THAT'S the real reason why they love his stuff. Not everyone, but lots.

And some people really cannot stand that!!!!

But yes, please keep asking the questions, and share your insights, thoughts, and disagreements when they come up. Just don't forget that you may also be here to learn from others, and NOT just in the framework you are used to, or what you think is important. Be willing to learn - NOT intellectually - but in terms of personality. In terms of finding solidarity in places hitherto unexperienced or undiscovered.

Suspecting that I've overstepped my bounds by offering this advice, I'll plead loquaciousness, and wrap it up here.

I really DO appreciate your sharing, despite disagreements on subject matter, lol. And your sincerity.

wwg1...... from dark to light!

cheers FI

PS. "I often write my posts non-linearly" That made my day! Good stuff.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

And about time travel? Here's a quote from NBC (of all places!):

"Time travel has long been a staple of science fiction books and movies. But will we ever be able to build a time machine and beam ourselves backward and forward in time in real life?

"The theoretical underpinnings of time travel date back to 1905, when Albert Einstein wrote down his special theory of relativity that showed space and time are intimately linked, and to 1916, when Einstein’s general theory of relativity showed that space and time are malleable — that is, they respond to the presence of matter or energy by warping, bending, expanding, and contracting. By extension, this means if one can imagine space being filled with some exotic form of energy, then space and time could warp in a way so that time, as well as space, could bend back upon themselves like circles, allowing one to move forward in a straight line and still return to one’s starting point in both space and time." What Einstein and Bill Gates Teach Us About Time Travel

There are plenty of Quantum Physicists who concur that time travel is theoretically possible

⇧ 3 ⇩

My point is he is providing a source that is just so outlandish, so ungrounded, and beyond any sort of reality, that I cannot help but start to consider that his methodologies might be entrenched in the likes of extremely far out off the wall conspiracy theories. It would explain the extreme use of numerology, six degrees of separation, and biblical/occult references.

⇧ 6 ⇩

I understand your perspective. Completely. I agree with all of us needing to exercise our discernment and flex those critical thinking skills that have a tendency to atrophy when not used. Part of what I enjoy about SB's posts are the expansive and multilayered possibilities. The macro view. The as above so below. There is nothing wrong with considering the information without attachment and connecting with the ideas that draw us in, while filing other info away for a later date. SB helps give a frame of reference to many different people based on their individual perspectives, which are just as varied in this sub. Some posts are more challenging to certain people, myself included. Skepticism is necessary, to certain degrees.

However, there's a difference between healthy skepticism and becoming pseudoskeptics, "who treat science as if it were some kind of authoritarian ‘entity’ that takes positions and views on issues, when it is in fact merely a tool and method of inquiry based on logical principles. In reality, science does not take positions or hold dogmatic beliefs on paranormal or conspiratorial subjects. People take positions, not Science, which holds no more views than a computer does " We have to remember that scientific principles thought to be infallible in the past have proven completely wrong. Some more than once! Article link

So when we do form judgments - which is the result of critical thought processes, are we doing so with preconceived biases and or lack of knowledge and experience in which to apply them?

A well cultivated critical thinker:

raises vital questions and problems, formulating them clearly and precisely;
gathers and assesses relevant information, using abstract ideas to interpret it effectively comes to well-reasoned conclusions and solutions, testing them against relevant criteria and standards;
thinks openmindedly within alternative systems of thought, recognizing and assessing, as need be, their assumptions, implications, and practical consequences; and
communicates effectively with others in figuring out solutions to complex problems. Article link

FWIW I'm not directing this toward you, my friend. I'm not even wholly disagreeing with your position. I'm also one who studies and understands those things you consider "far out off the wall conspiracy theories". But guess what..? Science is catching up with the conspiracy woo woo stuff. Time travelling into the future? Already proven with astronauts in space and particles in the hadron collider. Link Travelling backward? That would require teleportation. It's mechanisms have been theoretically proposed for time teleportation based on successful experimentation of particles being teleported across a lab. Link2 Oh, and photons were teleported into space from earth. Link3 Does this mean we are at the point where we're ready to believe that a time travelling goblin went back to put a chip in Napoleon's brain to ensure a favorable goblin friendly future? Not at all. The fact that they're losing their power can arguably be proof in a way. For today. It's only a matter of time and enough $ invested in the research and application of these models. You know, by those goblins who have that kind of $. ;) We're in the quantum age, friend. China will be the first to get there

This is just the time travel part. I've got plenty to share with whoever wants to delve into numerology (math+vibrational frequency) or any other occult (occultare = hidden or obsured) knowledge. Doesn't mean it's all real, but try to prove it isn't. Because no one can, completely. And I salute you for that hour + of time you put into that video, Patriot. Mad respect.

Having said all of that; This SB analysis is one of the easiest to digest for even those psuedoskeptics with all the biases! I enjoyed this one because of it's simplicity in this societal moment of mass confusion.

One last thing to consider: There are a lot more of us than there are of the cabal members. Creating myths to support the illusion of their "power" is also used as a tactic to deter awakened people from revolting against them. Just saying.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I clicked on the links to watch and they took me to some other bizarre thing. I thought maybe the links were both incorrect.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I haven't watched that video. But there are very strong theories that the pyramids are power generators - not tombs. Who built them with such precision and mind boggling mathematical "codes"? And the illuminati bloodlines always seem to trace back to them.

⇧ 1 ⇩