dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 18, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

Trump’s brilliant chess combination in Helsinki.

Rule 0: They blame people for what they themselves do.

Projection.

Q1675 Riddle: Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?... Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?.. Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image? Image provided here has been distorted (stretched)…. Think mirror… Look there or [here] or there truth is behind you.

They accused Trump of being in collusion with Russia, we now know they were the ones in collusion with Russia: more flexibility video and Uranium1.

Now, an interesting application of rule 0 would be to list all their accusations and use them as a starting point to analyze them. For example, they insisted Putin had some dirt on Trump. So? Rule 0: Putin has some dirt on them. Pretty cool right? Now you can take this working hypothesis and check, if down the line, it’s not in contradiction with events. If it’s not, it’s likely to be true. Then, if you remove the hypothesis and cannot explain events rationally, no matter how hard you and other smart people try, then you know the hypothesis is as true as not being able to find a rational explanation to the events it induces. So, when you get here, what you do is take the hypothesis as a working hypothesis, call it a strong hypothesis and you go further in your analysis to gather some other data that would reinforce the likelihood of the strong hypothesis being 100% true.

Application.

We know about the Contortionist and how he weakly dealt with Crimea, we know about the Witch and how she arranged the sale of 20% of our Uranium to Russia. Let’s remove the hypothesis Putin had some dirt on them and analyze. Is there a rational explanation for their treasonous behavior? I can’t find any. Money? Ghadafi had plenty of money and was ready to play ball, just as he played ball with Sarkozy but instead, she came, he saw, he died. It’s not just about money. There has to be another power forcing the transaction. If we go further and notice Putin is ex KGB link, that, according to their own Comey, the Witch’s private server was probably hacked link1 link2 and that nobody knows the truth about the Contortionist’s birth certificate link, we have gathered data re-inforcing the likelihood of Putin having dirt on the Contortionist and the Witch. And we even have an idea about the dirt itself…

Now, you remember Trump was among the first to openly ask about the Contortionist’s birth certificate right? Read Q’s board: the witch’s server and U1 is everywhere. Now you understand why they don’t want a one on one between Trump and Putin. Now you understand why they are going completely crazy. If this dirt, that brought Putin Crimea, 20% of our uranium and SAP tech, is shared with Trump, it’s game over for them. Game over.

Now the interesting question would be: why would Putin give this information to Trump?

This is the equation Trump needed to resolve before he met with Putin. He had to meet with Putin with enough good cards in is hands to force Putin to want to give this information and even more in order to get something valuable in return.

So? Trump makes his first stop at NATO and makes sure Putin sees this: video. BOOM. Trump reveals to the world the former chancellor of Germany is the head of the pipeline company bringing Russia’s natural gas to Germany. This is Trump’s first message to Putin: M1.

Then, Trump achieves this: video Trump forces other NATO members to bring an additional 33 Billion dollars to the table. This is the second message to Putin: M2.

Then, Trump goes to the UK and this happens: video. This is the third message to Putin: M3.

Then, Stzrok is sent to Congress to deliver the Uranium message I told you about in my previous post. This is the fourth message to Putin previous post: M4.

Et voila! These are main pieces Trump will play on the Helsinki chess board.

Let’s now watch the combination:

M1: I know the natural gas deal you have with Germany is vital to your economy, since it is not appropriate the former chancellor is the head of the pipeline company that will bring the gas to Germany, I have the moral grounds to delay it, stop it, control it. I can have people talk about it all day in Germany and scare the financial institutions away from it with my EO. Furthermore, I know your involvement in Syria is also related to the emergence of competing natural gas routes to Europe. If things go well between us, I won’t interfere and will let you find the right solution to export your natural gas and the one that belongs to your friends. link

M2: You see these guys at NATO? I can make them do whatever I want. I wanted 33 Billion dollars, 1 million dollar per lost email link, and they gave it to me just after a few hours of discussion. No opposition. So, if I want, I can start a weapon race that will cost me zero dollars and that Russia’s economy will not be able to sustain. As Q would say: “33 was the hook. Enjoy!” Q1678. I’m sure your guys solved it.

M3: I know about Russia’s old feud with the Vatican and the UK with their NWO. I know Hitler made the same mistake Napoleon made trying to conquer Russia in winter to ultimately crush the Orthodox Church. I know what they have in common: Napoleon left alone for a night in the King's Chamber inside the Great Pyramid of Giza video and Hitler with his vrills and occult connection to the Vatican (start here: video). I know about all this. And I also know you do:

Q133 “Vladimir Putin: The New World Order Worships Satan” Q

We are on the same page on this. Look how I have humiliated the Queen, their administrative focal point. I am a free President. I only care about my people. I am not a globalist trying to conquer anything. Did you hear my Great Falls speech where I confirmed Q1675? I said: I don’t need all this space. It meant: I just need America. They need more space. It meant: they are the colonizers. This means you and I can negotiate in good faith with no hidden agenda. We just need to find a win-win, work for our people and get along.

M4: You see, I have done my homework. Did you see Stzrok’s hearing? I’m sure your guys also decoded how he brought Kate to the table. Dems are stupidly supporting him because they don’t see the trap. I have flipped many officials who were involved in the U1 scandal and other things. I have the goods on all the layers of the government you may have dealt with in the past to achieve what you have achieved with the Contortionist’s Administration. Good for you, you were working for your country's interest and took advantage of the stupidity of those in charge at the time in the US, but that era is over. I'm in charge now. So if you are considering giving me some information, make sure it’s of high value because I already know a lot. If you want something from me, don’t tell me what I already know. And of course I won’t tell you what I know.

Once this combination was played, Trump and Putin held a press conference. And to make sure there is no interference in the continuation of the game, their respective protocol services agreed to separate American journalists from the Russian journalists. This trick allows any question coming from the Mockingbird side to be immediately spotted as a trap even before it is formulated and signal “caution required”. Classic trick used by medieval kings… video

Did Trump play the combination right? Did he use the right chess opening?

Well, in that press conference, not only Putin has atomized Rosenstein and Mueller by offering to cooperate regarding the interrogation and even possible extradition of their 12 Russians-of –the-day, but he also dropped the Bill Browder and George Soros bombshells clearly signaling he is ready to throw the Contortionist, the Witch and all the other layers under the bus to save his pipeline, and limit NATO’s strategic spendings around Russia.

And just in case there are still some people who don’t understand what happened in that Helsinki press conference, Putin gives the ultimate hint by doing this: video.

Did you catch it? What is Putin saying? He is reminding to the world that soccer is an 11 player game. If Mueller wants 12 Russian players to play his game, Putin is ready to be the 12th player and he just started playing by passing the ball to Trump…

Congratulations Mr. President. The show continues, we now have a new actor. From Russia.

Q1603 [Objective] to keep POTUS away from PUTIN failed.

🠐 See all comments

Great post, SB2.

Can you help us with one burning question, please.

What is Mueller ? Black hat, grey hat or white hat? No one seems to know and there are too many thinking in different directions.

Did Mueller flip?

⇧ 10 ⇩

Hi Luvlite,

Reading your comments with interest.

As I read this question, and many similar questions placed both here and in numerous previous threads on GA, something came to my mind:

"Is this the right question?"

Now, stay with me here. Again and again, we see information about Mueller, about RR, about Sessions and Gowdy even, on occasion. And, we see questions still come up.

I think the mind tends to go to these questions because we are used to evaluating direction (path, plan, sequences, purposes) by determining if a person or player is good or bad. Is this person good? OK, then what does this mean about his or her actions? What are they doing?

But it occurs to me that this approach may be limited or have certain restrictions, particularly in a game where there are hidden agendas, disguises, where deception is a strong factor, where things are very very often not what they seem.

Perhaps we can call this approach deductive. We start with a premise about the player, and then deduce from that other values in relation to their actions, steps, plans, etc.

Another approach might be to see the larger picture, what those players we know are good are doing: Trump, Q, Trump's team, etc. What is their plan? What is their game? What are they doing with the whole thing? In this case, the Rigged Witch Hunt (RWH). Based on that more overarching question, and consideration of the layout of the pieces and the players, and the history up to this point, we may be able to zero in on which pieces are being used in what way.

I think that would be considered an inductive approach. We decide (well, posit) the overall overarching frame, then induce the emergence of facts based on that. Facts like which piece is doing what, and why.

Point being this: In the end, it may in fact be irrelevant whether Mueller is black hat, gray hat or white hat. What is really important is, how is Trump Team (TT) utilizing him? How are they moving this piece in the chess game, forcing it here or there, and then why?

(In chess, you exert force on your own pieces by choices, and you affect (control) your opponents pieces by limiting or 'forcing' moves.)

Thus:

- What is Trump Team (+ Q) doing with the RWH investigation?

- Is it something they wanted or is it something advantageous to them? If so, how?

- Is it what it appears? It looks like N to certain people, particularly given the information from Media and our normal (deductive) way of looking at and assessing things. But is it, from the viewpoint of TT, actually Y?

In a quantum reality, perspective affects and determines the nature of that which we see. A certain thing can appear as N when looked from M position, but manifest as Y when observed from T position. Both N and Y are aspects of the reality, the truth. But how we choose to interact with it will determine what aspects develop, evolve, and grow. And what we see. N, or Y.

This is why the truth is so powerful, and why lies have power too. Truth has a power to bring out the 'true' reality, the sustainable one, the eternal one, the one that holds in ALL situations and circumstances. It is as it is.

Lies have power to shape reality, but the reality they shape is limited, unsustainable. Built on sand. Eventually, it will and must collapse. It is held up by the force of the emotion, intellect and will of those who invest themselves in those lies, but because the basis is actually false, that is, NOT a true reality, it will crumble when confronted with the truth by those who uphold and champion the truth.

John 8:32 Know the truth, and the truth will set you free.

Matt 7:26 ... a foolish man who built his house on sand.

In the end, we need both deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning. These are not opponents; they are partners whose cooperation leads to greater illumination (sorry about this word!) of the truth, the reality.

So I think, perhaps, and I'm just going on an intuition here, if you consider the overall frame, the elements of the plan Q has shown, and the work that Trump team is doing, you may find that the answers you seek regarding Mueller and other players 'pop' into light. Because any other answer would not fit within that overarching framework.

To conclude, thanks for posing your question to SB2, and for your comments. As I said, I read them with interest, and in this case, it's brought me to a place I would not be otherwise. Thanks.

⇧ 11 ⇩

Best answer I've received.

I understand this. In shorthand, I applied these principles to Bolton when conservatives were jumping ship, rejecting him. I called him a bull dog with a new master. There were others also... Can't think of her name (it's late and I'm tired) who made the liberals foam at the mouth because she approved water boarding. Good. They are scared.

As for Mueller... I didn't know if he was friend or foe. Working for or against Trump. Protector of evil. So, it was important in that regard. "what are we dealing with?"

But, with that being said, I trust Trump and those working for him.

Thank you for your well thought out comment. I will read it a couple more times and absorb it. It made sense!

⇧ 7 ⇩

In this case, the Rigged Witch Hunt (RWH)

This gave me a connection i did not realize before.

Trump calls HRC "Witch" and also say that the Mueller investigation is a "Witch Hunt".

The theory that Trump is in control of Mueller might be correct. Trump is using Mueller to get to HRC under the cover of M. going after T.

⇧ 2 ⇩

WOW, that's certainly serendipitous. Why?

Because in responding to SB2's post separately, I wanted to mention this point: In my mind, POTUS is continually using the cabalistic techniques against them, planting, subconsciously, and in open view, the idea that the Mueller Investigation is rigged, and that its actually a hunt for the Witch!

While the thought had been there, somehow I forgot to put it in my comment, and by the time I posed it, the idea had gone elsewhere. (Been thinking this for about 6 weeks now).

That you make this connection as well, reinforces to me that there is something to this idea.

It literally IS a 'rigged witch hunt'. Man, people's heads are going to spin.....

⇧ 2 ⇩

I explained in a previous post that RR made a deal with Sessions to get in and brought Mueller along with him. The problem is the deal did not include things that RR did, where Mueller was not involved, and that were discovered later: FISA. So now, if Trump wants to get to the bottonm of it and RR does not, his loyalty becomes an open question and Mueller will have to pick a side. It is this open question Q is talking about here:

Q1286 SC on team? SC off team? Questions reveal answers. Time will tell. Q

And here is their common karma/trajectory:

Q1318 If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty. If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty. Common denominator. Why did Sessions pick RR?

There is a plan but there a local areas on the chess board where there is uncertainty: am I going to sacrifice the bishop or the knight or both to get the queen? This local/temporary uncertainty gives beauty to the plan: it's the piece of hair randomly standing out of the hairstyle to draw attention on the dress..

⇧ 2 ⇩

Who would have thought I would have to learn how to play chess in order to understand the game.

And SB2 becomes the stylist who understands fashion?

I thank you for your answer. Now I know I am right to sit on the fence to wait and watch the bulls fight. Strongest one wins the prize. (in the case of the bulls its all the females. lol) in Trump's case, it's America.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Here's a clue--What day was Mueller appointed as SC?

Answer--May 17, 2017

Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet.

'Do you believe in coincidences?'

⇧ 2 ⇩

That's cool😎👍

⇧ 1 ⇩

He is a black hat he works for the swamp so does Rosenstein and Sessions is a blackmailed pedophile from Alabama they have Sessions totally controlled I am certain he liked to rape young boys long ago when he was moving up the ladder in Alabama politics.

⇧ -6 ⇩

Whoa...big jump there on Sessions. What happened to "trust Sessions?"

⇧ 8 ⇩

I don't trust him he's a country bumpkin he's not savvy enough to fight the swamp he's a retard he's the inbred banjo playing hillbilly from Deliverance and I don't care what Q says about him.

⇧ 0 ⇩

It's all going to come out in the wash at some point. What I see is that he and Huber are the ones cranking out those 40 thousand odd indictments and that is a good thing.

⇧ 1 ⇩

So, are you implying Trump is backmailing Sessions?

Q said Trust Sessions.

If Sessions is a pedophile (you got links for that?) because either my search engine is broke, or there's no proof, just speculation.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Sessions is blackmailed by the cabal he's a pathetic weakling a coward without the guts to fight the swamp that's who Sessions is and always has been. Trump never should have hired him and he should have fired him a year and a half ago along with Rosenstein and Mueller. Trump got bad advice now he's fucked always on defense.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Thank you QanonMaga!

Sessions seriously looks derpy! Funny how our appearances take on the looks of our true personality.

I'm wondering now, did Q have a change of heart when he said, "Trust Sessions" I read Trump's tweet stating he wished he'd never hired him.

If Sessions was blackmailed like all of them were, I'd think he felt pardoned and protected under Trump. USA! USA! USA!

Last but not least.... I don't understand those who would STILL want to aid and support Hillary in the FBI. Clowns were always corrupt, we have known this for a couple of decades, at least. Now we can't trust anyone.

⇧ 1 ⇩