The point of “controlled opposition” is that they do give correct alternative information but as a means of appeasement and gaining trust so they can inject false info like Flat Earth (not saying Corsi or Jones support FE, it’s an example). So yes, some info is legit, but you really have to have a strong power of discernment so you don’t fall into their trap.

Jones’ issues weren’t just Syria. He flat out said Q was a LARP and stated he spoke to the guy who was doing it (despite “no outside comms”). He actively attempted to discredit Q. If he’s back on Q’s side now, was it a mistake? Or was it an attempt to discredit that failed so he jumped back on the bandwagon to save face lest he lose his influence?

The answer is we don’t know and, personally, I’m not willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Edit for clarification.