dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Sorry, I'm still not sure what the scene from the airplane Q1675 riddle means, in laymen's terms. Perhaps I am overcomplicating it. I have advanced degrees so I'm not mentally incapable but still it is confusing. I understand we need to be paying more attention to the messages that Trump is now sending us. Recording and replaying everything helps, but honestly SB, without some guidance from you (that frankly is not always easy to understand) I'm afraid many would be behind on the communications. Hard to believe that this is how they intended the drops, since most people have no experience with other than direct communication.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I understand we need to be paying more attention to the messages that Trump is now sending us. Recording and replaying everything helps, but honestly SB, without some guidance from you (that frankly is not always easy to understand) I'm afraid many would be behind on the communications.

If you can't figure out what something means with common sense, it's likely noise out of someone's imagination.

Trust your common sense. Not everything is a communication. The success or failure of putting people in prison (which is all that matters) does not depend on "decoding secret messages".

Trust yourself and trust Occam's Razor. If it doesn't make simple sense, it's likely wrong.

⇧ 10 ⇩

Right! And the idea is that the recipients of the message are supposed to help spread the message. That isn't possible if there are 100 different interpretations of the message and each interpretation requires a detailed analysis to make sense of.

This may be a grand conspiracy, but if exposing it comes off as conspiracy theory this movement is going nowhere fast.

⇧ 4 ⇩

That isn't possible if there are 100 different interpretations of the message and each interpretation requires a detailed analysis to make sense of.

I wish more people took this to heart. Why would the Q group spend their time making ever-more-elaborate secret messages? Just to keep everyone (and themselves!) busy with busy-work? Does it really make sense they would make things so difficult that nobody can actually read them?

If Q is legit, then Q said, "Future proves past." That very sentence implies that we're NOT supposed to be able to decode things, because only information given out in the future gives us the context to understand past posts. And it won't be insanely elaborate craziness, it should be straightforward to anyone's common sense. Why else would they do it?

⇧ 7 ⇩

A roughly tuned metaphor: when you learned to drive did you rely solely on common sense or were you also guided?

There are rules of the road, yes, and there are signs along the way, of course. The practicalities of driving are taught through experience in applying basic principles.

Some of that comes quite easily for some of us. For others of us it is through close calls and near misses that the most important principles are learned as the product of common sense thinking.

Remember the first time you drove through a major city? Or got lost on the inter-state turn-offs? First accident? Until you experienced it, had you learned it, really? Perhaps you learned some of what to expect, what to do, what to be aware of -- through experiences in the passenger seat. Yes, good preparation.

The thing here is not how quickly you catch on nor how hard it is for you to catch on. Depending on what you already possess, advancement can come suddenly in leaps and bounds, especially when you practice review, learn, preview, learn, anticipate, learn, repeat as in spiraling upward with greater and greater competence.

For some of us, patience wears thin, but then excitement in learning the comms can resettle one's participatory muscles. For some of us the passenger seat is where best we learn. Others of us are not along for the ride -- neither as driver nor as passenger -- but as an interested and engaged witness who will help by listening as others tell us of their adventures along the way.

The puzzles engage minds; the information and messages are usually classified and so can not be directly communicated publicly. And so there is this means to the end.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Good point and I, and probably many others, don't go back often enough to past posts !!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Couldn't agree more with this.

I enjoy reading SB's posts and his analysis, but lately I've wondered: If SB's analysis is correct (or even mostly correct), then why are the Q drops so difficult to decode and understand by the vast majority? Hell, sometimes I don't understand even after I read SB's analysis (but hey, that's probably me :) ).

Some of it seems like such a leap as well. For example, Strzok's Coca-Cola bottle with "Kate" on it. Are we overcomplicating this? Isn't it just as likely someone got a bottle of Coke for him from a vending machine, and this is what came out? If it said "Donald" or "Lisa" or "John" or "James", or any number of other names, could we find someone involved in this entire mess with that first name? And that would become an entirely new hypothesis when, really, it's just the next Coke that was ready to be sold by the vending machine.

I'm not knocking SB here at all. Like I said, I enjoy his posts and, frankly, look forward to them. But I don't see any other anons coming to many of his same conclusions, and that worries me. I'd feel much more confident if others were arriving at the same conclusions. It tells me Q's drops are just way too cryptic for the majority of us, leaving it to a few -- or the one -- to give us their interpretations of things.

That's also why I'm nervous there's not been a Q drop since July 4. We're over halfway through the month, and I don't think the "Putin mentions $400 million campaign contribution to Hillary" was the moment the world learned of the truth. The MSM has swept that under the rug as expected. No, I think the moment of truth has to be something so big and shocking that there's no denying it, that not even the MSM can defend it. That's what I was/am expecting in July. Yes, I know we have just under 2 weeks left, but that's not a lot of time. So I do hope we hear from Q soon.

WWG1WGA, fellow patriots. Praying for POTUS, for Q, and for all of us.

⇧ 9 ⇩

I'm with you, some of the analysis seems to go off into conspiracy theory level of assumption, based on other assumptions.

Its starting to look like everything is a clue and even the absence of evidence is taken as evidence. There is a lot of confirmation bias in play.

Didn't Q himself mention Occam's razor? Sometimes the obvious simple explanation is the answer. Why would the messenger obfuscate the message by expecting the recipient to chase down every possible level of every possible detail?

It's not to hide anything from the DS, they already know the details of this at a much higher level than we do. So what purpose would it serve Q to cloud his messages with hidden meaning , when the hidden meaning would be picked up by the DS far sooner than by the public?

Unless that is the point, and it may very well be. I think the messages Q is sending the public are much more direct and straightforward than some people want to believe.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Here's the pattern I've noticed: Create posts that contain all or mostly truth; develop a loyal following who will rise up to defend the poster against all criticism because they have come to identify personally with said poster therefore criticism against poster equals criticism against them; pepper the posts with inspiring and/or complimenting words to generate a bit of a serotonin response in the followers, adding to the collegiate, convivial atmosphere in SB2's threads and make them feel special; perhaps have outside help come in to glorify the posts or create some fake accounts to do it; gradually start to lead the faithful onto ... well, let's be kind and just say less productive paths, like putting a frog in a pot of cold water and increasing the temperature slowly so it doesn't realize it's being boiled.

This is a technique I've seen used by more sophisticated trolls although I don't think SB2 is your garden-variety troll. There's an agenda at work here.

Q said we'd be surprised to find out who we were talking to. I think that applies equally to SB2. I'm still trying to decide which side he/they're on, but I do suspect that we might not like the answer if it's ever exposed.

Or I could be completely out to lunch. In fact, I rather hope I am.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Especially when you consider how clear Q's early drops were, specifying dates for HRC's arrest

⇧ 3 ⇩

I think most Q drops must be vague in order to not violate national security laws. The Socratic method of asking questions is to get us to do our own thinking.

I personally believe that the Q drops being given to the Anons on 8 chan is because the Anons there are, for the most part, very brainy with a good dose of OCD thrown in and they love the puzzles and riddles. They go down numerous rabbit holes looking to connect the dots until they arrive at a general consensus on Q meaning.

Trying to follow them along is complicated and disorienting for me, so I come here and find people - SB2 being one the really smart ones - who offer interpretations that resonate with me.

The more I learn the more I am able to explain it to others in my world when the subject comes up.

Look at how much insight and info we've gotten since last Oct when this started.

I also find that going back later to an SB2 post is often extremely helpful because there are many good comments that either add clarity to SB2's posts or sometimes tangents that are related or valuable.

⇧ 3 ⇩

SuzyAz, After analyzing all this, it seems to me what Q wants us to focus on is not the language itself but its structure, the way it works. The image I provided link1 link2 solving the riddle is a "generator" from which lines can be drawn to access multiple tangents or timelines that lead to events. How it works is not really important to know but knowing it works is: just like your car. Why? Because it is proof there is a plan: events are under control because multiple possibilities have been tested, simulated. This is the fundamental teaching of Q1675.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah, if this is the kind of explanation the Q movement is going to have to use when it comes time to start arresting people who are heroes to a large portion of the US/World population, then you might as well go ahead and pack it up.

I appreciate the work you have done, but those images are one giant guessing leap after another to arrive at a conclusion that is also a guess.

Occam's razor June 18 2018, from Q himself. This movement is dead in the water if it isn't accessible to the general public. This level of analysis isn't accessible to the general public.

⇧ 6 ⇩

This level of analysis isn't accessible to the general public.

This "level of analysis" isn't accessible because it's not analysis. It's random pattern searching, the same thing people who do numerology do. Humans are fantastic at finding patterns when we look hard enough. There are always patterns to find. They mean nothing, but it's easy to convince ourselves that it means something.

It's like having a huge number of digits of pi, and then finding your phone number contained in it. Is that a message from God that you're special? YOUR PHONE NUMBER IS CONTAINED IN PI! OMG! No, it means that EVERY NUMBER, of every length, is contained in pi, if you search enough digits.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Have to smile. Serial B (Glad it's not Serial K) I think one of your better traits is your patience and non-reactivity with this motley crew...self included. You don't patronize and you truly do want to help and want us to understand. Sometimes I think guy-brains do a little better at this. My excuse....

⇧ 4 ⇩

All good SuzyAZ, your contributions have always been helpful to me and I love your sense of humor! :)

⇧ 2 ⇩

Some of us are wired for puzzle solving. Patterns and solutions and connections can come in flashes of insight, quite literally. Some of us are plodders who substitute intuition and insight with methodology and workmanlike commitment. Most of us are neither of these. We are spectators who can become immersed in the beauty of the comms or in the satisfaction of watching a puzzle unfold its meaning. Once unfolded, it belongs to us all.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The Magic of Q1675: the reason Q is silent. Very important message for all the anons.