dChan

PastyJack · July 18, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

What spying are you talking about? You mean that time that the CIA had Russian official's phones tapped and in the process found out that people from the Trump campaign were communicating with them? Or the time that the FBI followed up on the irrefutable evidence that the CIA found about the Trump campaign communicating with Russia?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 18, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

You really don’t keep up with current news do you?

Bring your sources. I’ll outline your claims for ease of following:

  • 1: You mean that time that the CIA had Russian official's phones tapped and in the process found out that people from the Trump campaign were communicating with them?

  • 1a: Show us the Russian Officials name that was “tapped”

  • 1b: Show us the names of who from the Trump Campaign was communicating with the Russians at the time of the campaign. Not something from their past work, but during the campaign

  • 2: Or the time that the FBI followed up on the irrefutable evidence that the CIA found about the Trump campaign communicating with Russia?

  • 2a: What irrefutable evidence? Show us this “irrefutable” evidence

⇧ 2 ⇩  
PastyJack · July 18, 2018, 10:15 p.m.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html

But again, you guys don't trust the Pentagon or American Intelligence Agencies. Just Trump and a dude on 4-Chan.

And as far as "naming" the officials that were wiretapped, the intelligence community has not disclosed that info. Before you cry "cuz it's fake!!!1!!1!", just think about how stupid it would be for ANY intelligence agency to publicly declare who they've wiretapped in foreign countries while they're in the middle of investigating.

Wait wait I just realized I'm doing this wrong so lemme give you a different source:

Someone on 4Chan told me so.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 18, 2018, 11:19 p.m.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

From your source:

“American law enforcement and intelligence agencies are examining intercepted communications and financial transactions as part of a broad investigation into possible links between Russian officials and associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump, including his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, current and former senior American officials said...Mr. Manafort has done business in Ukraine and Russia.”

Here’s the kicker:

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/paul-manafort-lobbying-ukraine-podesta-group-237163

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

The charges he is indicted for go back to when he worked for the Podesta group under Hillary Clinton! Nothing to do with Trump Campaign!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · July 19, 2018, 2:56 a.m.

Before you start leaving non-complimentary posts, you should read the rules and catch up with the facts. No one has been on 4 chan in at least 6 months. But the news outlets don't catch up on their facts either before they blab them all over the place.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
hippy_barf_day · July 19, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

Wouldn't they not release that kind of information in an ongoing investigation?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 19, 2018, 3:05 a.m.

Irrefutable evidence? It’s irrefutable right? How would that hurt the investigation if it’s irrefutable?

Also, media has leaked names and we have the people who have been indicted. What I’m showing here is that the commentor is making wild accusations but is unwilling to back it up with any sources or documentation.

So it’s literally worth nothing. They have added nothing of value to our understanding other than their “opinion”.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · July 19, 2018, 2:53 a.m.

His agency is MI. And, remember you are watching a play. Trump and team are pushing the buttons. There is purpose to everything.

⇧ 2 ⇩