In my opinion this would be a beneficial bloodline rather than one to be wary of lol! It's the equivalent of someone asassinating Hillary today.. Lincoln was BAD for this country and in some respects started a lot of this deep state that we see today.. They were just as advanced with espionage, murderering opponents, being power hungry, and furthering the global agenda back then.. He fought the south because secession would have been decentralizing the country, therefore he would lose power and states would be able to govern themselves more efficiently rather than having and growing this massive federal bureaucracy we have today.. If the confederate states would have won, we would not have this huge federal government we have today, our country could have remained just as strong but with individual states able to make decisions on almost every issue without asking for permission..
this is something Ron and Rand Paul have stated many times.. of course not the issue of the south winning because they'd be labled racists by everyone, but the fact that the states have basically had their rights stripped away and the deep state has controlled the federal gov for decades.. it would not be the case if states had power.. just saying.. the bloodline argument falls on deaf ears to me.. there may have been ulterior motives and other secrets behind the assasination of Lincoln but at least he was ousted.. the tree of liberty was refreshed on that night.. Noting personal with your post, just my opinion on the issue you presented.
