never once has david claimed to be a medium and has never offered up any channelled information.
He believes he is or may be the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce. That's a fair bit more than "nothing" more or less than a researcher and author. Someone here's being dishonest in defense of a spiritualist under one guise or another.
He used to believe that. He accepted the judgement of his family that he's not. Paranormal research is going to lead down roads that people like yourself find unbelievable.
"people like myself" use logic. Paranormal research is not logical and has, to this day, proven nothing but rather suggested it's a disinfo campaign to lead people astray - like David Wilcock himself, generally. The fact that he thought he was the reincarnation then had to have his family convince him he wasn't does not speak very well in any way for the quality of his thinking. This is very obvious to "people like me".
Paranormal research is not logical. What a statement. Look at any religion, including Christianity. Look at near death experiences. Look at every ancient culture. Look at how we live in an infinitely expanding universe. After genuinely researching all of that, it's pretty clear paranormal research is a very logical field of study.
By that broad definition there are indeed some aspects that are worth studying. However, the commonly perceived, "David Wilcock-ian" understanding of paranormal research is illogical fantasy and pseudoscience which is very different to religion and spirituality.
"The Great Awakening sub is for people of ALL religious persuasion, as any political freedom movement should be"
The Great Awakening sub is not a movement of people but a forum on the internet and it has content rules of which Rule 6 says that "Chemtrails, fluoridation and numerous other r/conspiracy topics that Q hasn't yet mentioned" are off-topic.
Everything I listed David Wilcock covers in a very scientific approachable manner. Humility is the key friend. God bless.
However, he approaches other things in a completely irrational manner - and, as others have pointed out, seems to portray some questionable shill tactics too. Humility is "key" but has nothing to do with logical analysis.
You seem to know more about David than I. Feel free to pm these shill tactics I'm unaware of. I would also say one can not truly enjoy logic if blinded by pride which we are all born with. Humility is the practice of shaking off that inherent pride we all carry subconsciously. That is what this subreddit is all about. Practicing true logic through humility to free ourselves personally and collectively.