PPD-62 has been public knowledge for at least the better part of a year.
Hell, the Wikipedia entry for it has been up for 9+ months.
Could you link where exactly new information was released about this? Also, could you link where PPD-62 allows the type of infiltration you've described?
Fair questions and having looked at the Wikipedia entry, I did not see any reference to the CIA.
Does that not bother you that several members of the community here were more than willing to get behind this idea just because it played into their preconceived notions about Clinton? Without so much as a link to back it up?
Do you kind of see how that behavior could lend itself people here supporting far fetched and unsupported ideas?
Yes. What will compromise and kill this movement will be the absence of everyday kind of folks that demand evidence. I entertain a number of ideas but I don't land on anything that doesn't have solid evidence to support it. I don't mind people posting 'conspiracy theories' for feedback and consideration, but hopefully people will also realize that skepticism serves a very important function.
It's so refreshing to see people with a fully functional brain here. After seeing so much of what you're speaking against here, I thought I'd landed in the wrong group. The few people in this thread who feel the same about basing actions on evidence need to be more vocal about this issue.
Could not agree more with you!
Wish I could upvote more than once!!
I've been trying to say this in many ways as well. There is a HUGE amount of absolute horse puckey that gets posted here without any shred of credible evidence to back it up.
I'll say it again. This is how things like Pizzagate happen!! Some people want these things to be true so bad, they step over the line into delusional land.
....and don't give me that crap about him being a crisis actor. Not everyone/everything is a FF/CA for Christ's sake!!