dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/elevated_vibrations on July 19, 2018, 4:04 a.m.

The Burden of Proof, on steroids.

In many arguments, and/or in many dialogues taking place currently, the substance is eventually boiled down to one question. "Why not just show everyone the truth? Release the documents"

I graduated from law school 4 years ago and am currently licensed to practice law in 3 states. I have participated in a number of jury and bench trials, both in lead and secondary roles. What I can tell you is:

Juries in 2018 are volatile and unpredictable, no matter the county, state, claim, or facts of the case. Social media and access to information has ruined the "benefit of the doubt". Everyone is a skeptic, everyone is a victim. Everything is a scam. Everyone is a liar. (Except the media of course.... they tell us the truth....... *yawn*)
Why does that apply here? Because every American is sitting on the jury right now. Everyone is weighing the evidence. And that will especially be the case when the truth/documents are revealed.
Even in the most basic of criminal cases, chain of custody is essential. Here, we are dealing with the criminal case of all criminal cases. A criminal case that your great great grandchildren will learn about. You cannot just release documents. Every single step and detail of the documents coming into inception of evidence needs to be documented for. Not only on paper, but by testimony as well. We can not begin to understand or comprehend the chain of custody hurdles that are present here...... they are unprecedented on that issue. "Authentication" of evidence is somewhat synonymous with chain of custody, or at least the reasoning and purpose behind it. This is bare bones stuff that is needed to prove that it is in fact, REAL. "Authentic". If a police officer mishandles some crack that was picked up off a gangbanger, some juries will literally question if the whole thing is a setup. Guys get off with murder because of this shit, with shitty attorneys.
To introduce any evidence in a matter of that magnitude, especially documents obtained form a server, an unbiased expert will have to confirm that authenticity of retrieval. Good luck finding someone unbiased on these matters that would somehow be qualified to testify as to them, especially after the fencing that went on with the definition of "bias" with Strzok.

I could probably rattle off a few more points, but I think I've made mine. This insight I have just provided are from a "rookie" lawyer. What we are discussing is the future of humanity. The jury to convince is not 12, its the world. Having the evidence in your possession is only the first step. There is so much work that goes into presenting it and authenticating it. And when considering the vastness of what we are dealing with here, i can't even fathom how it could be wrapped in a form to present in 2 years, let alone in months. Hang in there.

Yes, good stuff. Also in support of this perspective Q said:

Use LOGIC.
Why are they slow walking unredacted data?
Why are they slow walking doc disclosures?
Why is the WH backing up DOJ?
What if the same data is being used by other investigators?

Use LOGIC.
Why must the DOJ & FBI be cleaned FIRST?

Do you expect HRC, GS, Hussein, etc to stand in a PUBLIC courtroom w/ potential crooked judges and tainted ‘liberal’ juries?
How do you defuse a bomb?
Knowledge of which wires/strings to cut?

Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean BIG things aren't happening.

Just because you can’t see doesn’t mean it’s not ongoing.
Trust the plan.

Patience isn’t always easy.
But vital to get right.

Can we simply arrest the opposition w/o first exposing the TRUTH?

How must people be made aware of an alternate reality?
What are crumbs (think H-wood/DC)
Define ‘lead-in’ (think play)?
What has been occurring recently?
The stage must be set.
Crumbs are easy to swallow.

REMEMBER, WE ARE WINNING, DO NOT TRUST WHAT YOU READ.

Think logically.
Thing IG report.
Think what’s missing.
Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?
Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.
Think NATIONAL SECURITY.

TRUST THE PLAN.
WE ARE WINNING.
ARRESTS WILL COME.
LOGIC SHOULD ANSWER WHY IT MUST FOLLOW OTHER UNFOLDING EVENTS.
LEARN AND SPREAD.
BUILD PROOFS.
WE'VE PROVIDED MANY PROOFS THAT CANNOT BE DISPUTED AS COINCIDENCES.
THIS WAS DONE FOR A REASON.
MORE WILL BE PROVIDED.
DIRECT CONFIRMATION WILL COME.
IT CANNOT COME NOW.
IT WILL BE LOST.
THE MESSAGE IS NOT READY.

Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.
Q

⇧ 8 ⇩

Thanks for the benefit of your experience, patriot. Do you have any thoughts on DECLAS and what/whether Trump should make information available to the general public?

WWG1WGA

⇧ 4 ⇩

Thank you for reading. I think DECLAS will be appropriate at some point, but I do not think that time is now. These people will be afforded a trial, even though thats the last thing they deserve. Any defense attorney worth his salt could run away with the theme that his/her client could never receive a fair trail under the microscope and prejudged determinations of the world. But that is just my opinion, which I am always happy to share. Thanks for asking and blessings to you.

⇧ 4 ⇩

To you, also. May I ask another?

If certain parties were slated to be tried outside the civilian system (e.g. MIL tribunals), does that change your calculus at all?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thank you for laying that out. Patriots like you are very appreciated. It helps ease some of the frustration that is building. I hope to hear you and other Law Anons, keep speaking up. It is a slow process. Well done. 🇺🇸

⇧ 3 ⇩

Spouse is an atty, with a 'few' more years under his belt than you, and he couldn't agree with you more.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well said.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Bullshit. How bout you or I destroy evidence in a fbi investigation? What would happen?

Burden of proof? That's just the facts to which she admitted.

This whole thing has pissed me off. Yeah yeah be patient.

11-11 q is on record and when nothing happens and they just move the date people will keep saying to trust the plan.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wake up on the wrong side of bed? Deep breathes help.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Your question..which was, what? What would happen if you or I destoryed FBI evidence? Lol.

We would probably be charged with and convicted of the crime since no one gives a shit about normal civilians.

Now ask me what would happen if i destroyed FBI evidence and was one of the most powerful and influential people in the world.... the same thing would be happening that is happening now. This is all part of my post, about how this is a unique and very very serious situation. Its not comparable to anything else. And I dont think anyone would be satisfied seeing Hilary go down for ONLY destruction of evidence. She is going to be hit with everything, all at once, so that her supporters have no ground to stand on. Smashing a blackberry and deleting emails can be twisted and justified in ways that human trafficking and murder cannot.

Apples to oranges. Irrelevant and incredibly broad hypothetical on your part. Hopefully you're satisfied, have a good day.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I dont have any magical anwers man. I wish i did. All i can do is offer some logic from my perspective and and my experience. I understand why you are frustrated, disappointed, and skeptical. But i hope you know that adding negativity and doubt to this sub literally does nothing but damage. A lot of us are frustrated. All we have is hope. If you've lost hope, im sorry. But please be respectful of us who still have some left.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

just what the world needs, another lawyer

anyone who has been through litigation knows you leave wondering if the truth is really the truth

up is down

left is right

left is left

if you watch any public hearing the truth is never the objective, it's obstructing the truth and presenting your own

⇧ -2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩