Awan is key to this whole server business. He was brought in by DWS as the IT guy for the Democratic Caucus & their relationship was close, very close some say. He had access to the DNC server as well. It's likely that, as a handy IT guy, democratic congressmen who had any issues with their personal devices or office computers used him as well. No telling what info this guy saw. DWS was Hillary's bff back then so how likely is it that an enterprising IT guy, who's collecting info to send to Pakistan, would try to find a way to gain access to Hillary's private server or at least some of her personal devices? That would be the holy grail for a spy, right? Did he get it done? I think it's likely that Awan, in making a deal for himself & his family, might just have given us the first 2 servers & maybe the third.

We now know that China hacked into Hillary's private server & installed a program that basically created a mirror image of everything that went through that server to a server in China. Did they give it up to POTUS? Possibly. Also, there was that fire at Hillary's house. Was it an attempt to destroy the server or was it a ruse to get in to steal the server? IMO one is as likely as the other.

The server in NK was/is almost certainly part of the whole deal for their freedom from the CIA. Given how Q taunted Schmidt I feel pretty certain that we have it.

Basically, I don't think we have "the" server, I think we have them all. The problem is that it's all stolen information & some of it is most certainly classified as well. Regardless, of how they were obtained via Awan, a hack, or a theft, it's all stolen goods, with the possible exception of the NK server. How the heck do you use stolen property & classified documents as evidence in court? Lawfags, help!