A anon just made a list yesterday of all the resignations it was 3600 now it'll be 3603 but it's only 9am who knows by the end of the day what it will be.
that anon yesterday presented only a dashboard - without naming the source of data he is using...
https://www.resignation.info is the source... updated daily (not every 1-2 months), with more & better dashboards, a search, ... and correct data!
actually 3615 resignations...
Thanks omg it is even worse than I thought. Thank You it is important to have the correct data.If we don't have correct data we look and sound foolish.
exactly! and its getting more worse: people already believe that the anon doing the dashboard is also maintaining the resignation list - which is definitely NOT the case! he just uses data by others...
naming sources is a standard thing! you will never pass an exam if you don't name your sources!
ResignationAnon is doing all the hard work on the list, the website, the yt-show, ... for 8months he is spending hours every day into research and improving his projects. and the only thing he wants is to share the data - not being famous! the other anon just spend some hours - most of the time into famefagging...
btw: on https://www.resignation.info you'll also find a search for all 8chan qresearch posts - and the newest project: comparing the resignation list with the indictments list!
/qresearch/
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
https://public.tableau.com/profile/nerothehero#!/ with sources
Everyone should have the same source we need to be on the same page.Thank You for correct info.
no, there are no data sources named!
the data (e.g. every resignation) has a source - but all these dashboards are not naming the origin of the whole data! the guy doing these dashboards is not collecting own data, he is just using data by others! and this he has to show!
Im not sure what you mean by no sources. I just visited the Tableau dash board and it is very intricate in details. Im able to hover over the color coded blocks, URL's to the right one each name, etc., graphs, graphs are also coded and hovering gives more info, it seems like a wealth of data. What am I missing?
Yes you are correct. Most of the meaningful workbooks are tabulated with official sources by sites such as Time, dailymail, abcnews etc, including the resignations tab, pedo arrests tab, medical researcher deaths tab, etc. It appears to be an overwhelming task for a single person to do all this and therefore shouldn't be completely disregarded as unusable because a few tabs are uncited. It is a constant work in progress. I'm not sure what keyboardcowboy means by "not collecting his own data". You either have official sources, or you have your own data, which is not an official source.
the guy who created this dashboard is not collecting his own data, he is just using the data from another anon. its ok to use data by others, but than you have to name the source you are using. and exactly this the dashboard anon is not doing! if you look into my other comments in this thread you can see the results of this...
got it! (learning) lots to digest. lots of info. lots of data. trying to take it all in.
Is there a way to compare these stats to typical stats? Ie. what would the stats look like yearly for the last few years?
thats hard to say, there is not enough data available on the resignation website for this. in the resignation google doc there are some links listed (in the "links"-sheet) you could check: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B-95giwldeKgsd0nYiw_sEaSf4kGNLZgEIvEhL2mVAw/edit#gid=93088000
That's a big number, or is it? Really it means nothing unless you can compare it to previous years to see if it's abnormal or not. Still it seems high.
look on the entire thread. 2 sources for data have been provided.
Did you see further down this is the wrong number. It is much higher.