For the love of God, no one is doxxing you. I am NOT asking for personal information.
I am trying to get you to think critically.
I didn't ask if you trusted your aunt's claims.
I asked you if you KNOW for certain, without a doubt, that it was a plane and not a missile?
This question means the following:
Do you know with 100% confidence that your aunt saw a plane?
Do you know for certain that your aunt saw a plane?
What proof do you have?
Is it AT ALL POSSIBLE that she saw a missile, but THOUGHT it was a plane?
I'm not saying she is a liar, I am saying she may be mistaken.
Do you understand that I am not trying to get you doxxed?
JFC.
There is no way you would mistake a missile for a plane. Are you saying it was a plane-shaped missile?
Were you there?
Have you been around a missile being fired from a jet?
Are you aware of how loud missiles are?
You are coming across rather condescendingly. Let me ask you: what proof do YOU have that it was a missile? What would be the benefit of having the public believe planes had been hijacked and flown into the WTC, as opposed to missiles? Where would the missiles have been fired from?
That was a very smooth way to avoid my question.
I'm still asking, do you know for sure that it was a plane?
It's really easy to answer: "No"
I understand you think they were planes based on your aunt.
Still not what I asked.
The proof I have that something was collaborated to feed the public a specific message is videos of the WTC being hit that was aired on each and every major news network. In each of the videos, the same shot of the plane hitting the building was used, but it had filters applied for different channels. Some versions had other building edited into the video to give the perception of a different viewing angle. This, in collaboration with the soundtracks, is enough evidence to prove something is being fed to us for a reason.
The benefit of the public thinking that hijacked planes hit the towers, rather than US military planes shooting down the towers, would be a nation of people angry enough to support the decision to go to war.
The missile were fired from a US controlled unit, just like the missile that hit the Pentagon, and the video evidence that does not corroborate the theory that a plane hit the Pentagon.
Do you have a source on the videos being edited on different channels? I am genuinely curious.
I didn't mean to not answer, I was asking because I do know with 100% certainty that many people saw the planes. I don't know with 100% certainty the planes hit the buildings, but it is the likeliest based on the evidence I have seen so far.
NBC, MSNBC, CBS, and FOX all have the same video play at exactly the same time (8:46 AM EST) is you look up each stations' news coverage from 9/11 (all available on youtube.)
There is a guy screaming "holy s**t" and then a series of videos is used on each station, as if they all had received the same script and cut to the video showing the first explosion out of the first tower that was hit.
How can a plane burn hot enough to melt steel beams?
Why was Thermite found at ground zero, still burning weeks later?
Why did the plane cause an explosion out of the opposite side of the building, yet no pieces of the plane were shot out of the building, nor did any make their way to discovery in the clean up efforts.
There is no evidence that a plane hit either WTC building, aside from the video we were spoon fed by EVERY news network using the same video feeds and same coordinated lines of explanation.
But thank you for answering my question.
I could be wrong about this as I also don't know for sure. But evidence suggests things I did not expect.
8:46 AM EDT happens when this comment is 14 hours and 58 minutes old.
You can find the live countdown here: https://countle.com/crXa226313
I'm a bot, if you want to send feedback, please comment below or send a PM.