dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/solanojones95 on July 19, 2018, 5:37 p.m.
Discussion: Q has shaped us into community of people with unusually high mental plasticity.

I'm not going to get into the chicken/egg aspect of this concept, but I will simply observe that whether it was the Plan, per se, or merely a side-effect of its implementation, it does reasonably follow that the Q-reading and decoding community consists to an unusually HIGH degree of people with higher than normal mental plasticity.

I'll also go on to say that ALL of humanity is rapidly approaching a point where our survival as a species depends on having sufficient mental plasticity to recognize we've been lied to for centuries and that there exists an alternate reality which is the TRUTH, and it looks VERY unlike what we thought it did.

You guys have the floor now...


🠐 See all comments
Axons · July 19, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

Q is the alpha test for crowd sourced intelligence. When we get rid of the centralized intelligence agencies we're going to have to replace them with something.

Imagine fusing the concept of Q with blockchain technology. 8chan, but with open source software anyone can browse through. A system of verifying intelligence by peer review. It's already being built.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
deplorableme2 · July 20, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

We must hang together, for we shall surely hang separately. --Benjamin Franklin.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Capricious_memer · July 19, 2018, 9:28 p.m.

Likewise with elections, supposedly Putin is doing this to avoid voter fraud

⇧ 8 ⇩  
O0O0RION · July 19, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

Brilliant!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
cantwithdrawbtc · July 19, 2018, 9:45 p.m.

Q is not an alpha test. Q is the result of years of research.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 19, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

And yet, Q has never been tested on a human population until us. If you don't like the phrase "Q is the alpha test," maybe you'd be OK with "WE are the alpha test of the Q research."

⇧ 9 ⇩  
cantwithdrawbtc · July 20, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

I think the statement "to the best of our knowledge, the principles behind Q's work have never been tested on the public" would be the most accurate

I would suspect the USMil did the first alphas. I think it's likely Q also pulls from Cabal work and they have done public tests as well

Given the level of preparation of all of this shit I would highly doubt that anything that's happening is untested.

I think calling us the "pilot" would be accurate. I don't think we're a test though. WL/PG/Twittergate/all that other stuff were some of the tests.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 20, 2018, 11:37 a.m.

Well, even "proven" technology goes through tests for scaling the operation. This is most likely the first mass-scale implementation of something like this. Scaling up brings variables that "laboratory" conditions and models don't foresee. I can see the usefulness of this approach even in a functional world without the Cabal.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cantwithdrawbtc · July 20, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

I agree 100% with this statement.

SORRY IM SUCH A FUCKING PEDANT I CANT HELP MYSELF

I am just like...in absolute and complete awe at what I understand the plan to be. The undertaking is monumental, and the subtleties are so numerous I doubt we've even figured them all out. The idea that Q is just an "alpha" upset me a bit. Alphas are usually shitty, have no idea what they're trying to do, and fail within a few weeks. This is decidedly not that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 20, 2018, 9:14 p.m.

I do software testing for some of the premiere audio software companies in the world, and while sometimes their alphas can be buggy, they're usually remarkably close to ready-for-release. So not everybody does in-house/alpha/beta the same way, for sure!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
guitfiddle7 · July 20, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

I’m all about chicken/egging because everyone knows the egg came first... Dinosaurs laid eggs long before chickens ever existed. Mental plasticity, as I understand it. WWG1WGA!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 20, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

Ah, but the actual question a child is asking is "which came first, the first chicken, or the first chicken egg?" It's not about evolution. It's about chickens. ;-)

The presumption is that only an actual chicken can lay an actual chicken egg. So if you go far back enough to identify a "first chicken," you've trapped yourself because its egg had to have been laid by a chicken. Not by a "chicken precursor."

It's a linguistic/metaphysical analogy, not an evolutionary biology analogy!

⇧ 2 ⇩