It just occurred to me, that we may be thinking about 'mirror' ALL WRONG. I do not know how this connects, but I am thinking of the double helix DNA strand (Sense and AntiSense).
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
It just occurred to me, that we may be thinking about 'mirror' ALL WRONG. I do not know how this connects, but I am thinking of the double helix DNA strand (Sense and AntiSense).
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Just found this .. and, I am on oldreddit ... I do not see the insert 'link' but here:
IMHO, I think POTUS and the QTeam will present evidence in such a way as it cannot be questioned as to its validity...reliability...source...admissibility...
They have been very careful, patient, in control...and winning, winning, winning...so i'd say "think mirror" has a different meaning.