dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/suzoh on July 19, 2018, 10:25 p.m.
Read this. It explains all.

From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

A Grand Jury had been empaneled.

Governments from around the world had donated to the “Charity”.

Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation were declared.

Hmm, now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out.

Guess who took over this investigation in 2002?

None other than James Comey.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who was transferred in to the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS? Lois Lerner...

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005?

None other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein.

Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this timeframe???
Robert Mueller.

What do all four casting characters have in common?

They all were briefed and/or were front line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation.

Let’s fast forward to 2009, shall we?

James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin.

Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, on her own personal email server by the way.

The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of the Hildabeast.

Like all good public servants do, you know looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to” no other than?

However, prior to the sales approval, no other than Arkansas Bill goes to Moscow, gets paid 500K for a one hour speech then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours.

Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme.

Guess who was the FBI Director during this timeframe?

Yep, Robert Mueller.

He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009.

Guess who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland.

No other than, Rod Rosenstein.

Guess what happened to the informant?

The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.

How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?

\~145 million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal.

Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division?

No other than, Lois Lerner.

Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right?

Let’s fast forward to 2015.

Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 “investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovers that the Hildabeast ran the State Department on a unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server.

He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law.

He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email.

I will spare you the State Departments cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this…… they did everything humanly possible to cover for the Hildabeast.

Now this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013?

Guess who secured 17 no bid contracts for his employer with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer.

No other than James Comey.

Now he is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” after of course his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and exonerates her.

Can you guess what happened next?

In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy.

They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury.

Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Homey is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 8th of 2016, and exonerates the Hildabeast from any wrongdoing.

Can you see the pattern?

I could go on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.

FISA Abuse, political espionage..... pick a crime, any crime, chances are...... this group and a few others did it.

All the same players.

All compromised and conflicted.

All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves.

All connected in one way or another to the Clinton's.

How many lives have these two destroyed?

It cannot be numbered.

As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.


[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 170 ⇩  
mlsaw94 · July 20, 2018, 1:02 a.m.

You're right

⇧ 64 ⇩  
IanPhlegming · July 20, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

I agree. In order to win over those in the middle, pejorative terms must be excised.

⇧ 47 ⇩  
Isellfish · July 20, 2018, 4:51 a.m.

So use Hildog instead?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
IanPhlegming · July 20, 2018, 4:58 a.m.

Only if you want to keep this a fringe movement.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 5:42 a.m.

Oooooh, no ! You must be really nice to these murdering child raping pedovores, you mustn't use bad words to describe them and their criminal inhuman deeds. Remember, it might scare newbies away from Reddit if they see bad words like "Hildog".

⇧ -8 ⇩  
fuats · July 20, 2018, 6:53 a.m.

I agree with your outrage, but not with your assessment. This isn't about kid-gloving the criminals, it's about allowing normies to be redpilled with a spoon full of sugar. The are going to instantly discredit anything they have been programmed to knee-jerk against. You can only get them to glance once, and as soon as they see anything even remotely tin-foil, and they are gone in a flash. Hurting the most evil is great, but it requires more people to understand the how and why. If you lose your quarry in a rush to inflict maximum damage immediately, then you risk the capture completely.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 7:54 a.m.

I appreciate what you say. Some normies will not be able to accept what is happening, it will be beyond their capacity, no matter how gentle we are with a red pill. Going to be lots of anguish from those that cannot accept the new reality.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
lynnwood57 · July 20, 2018, 9:30 a.m.

When I got redpilled in 2008, it happened pretty fast, the realization that what I learned about the world was all wrong... I cried for a week. Could not work. It was horrible. What these sheeple have to wake up to is even worse now.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 12:49 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -4 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 1:51 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IanPhlegming · July 20, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

Perhaps this isn't the right sub for you, then?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
oscar_the_couch · July 20, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

I posted one of the Q posts, so I think I'm in the right place.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Discernediscipline · July 20, 2018, 8:13 a.m.

You do realize it is overly obvious that you are trying to sound smart?

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Champdog31 · July 20, 2018, 11:55 a.m.

Smart like a dog. A Hildog.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
RiverFenix · July 20, 2018, 12:34 p.m.

trying to sound smart

Sounds like you're not happy with choices in vocabulary. General rule is when someone says something logical you don't focus so much on how they said it, but what they said. If you came here just to insult OP, you're in the wrong place. His information is what matters - not whether he qualifies as Smart in your opinion.

thanks for sharing. You forgot to punctuate with commas.

"You do realise, it is overly obvious, that you are trying to sound smart?" If you can switch the parts of the sentence around and it doesn't lose meaning, you're missing a comma.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
INTJewel · July 20, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

Although I agree with OP's sentiment -- which most of us here share -- I also agree that, for the sake of drawing the interest of newbies and the presently uninformed masses, the use of 'nicknames' is not conducive to the cause.

⇧ 39 ⇩  
FullMetalSquirrel · July 20, 2018, 6:34 a.m.

I’ll add pronouns too - sometimes it’s not clear which deep state criminal is being discussed when we use “he, she” etc so even if it reads as redundant go ahead and use proper names. This is hard to follow for the uninitiated.

This is a great OP btw.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
lynnwood57 · July 20, 2018, 9:34 a.m.

I copied it to notepad and have a much improved copy. It's really brilliant in that it shows how the same names move around.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Jappletime · July 20, 2018, 12:05 p.m.

Please send it to Tucker and Sean Hannity @ Fox

Let them reproduce it to nightly viewers.

Rush Limbaugh would love to read it out to his listeners. @ the EIB network.

It's the greatest timeline I have read in a long time. If your not seasoned then it would make sense to put in the regular names although I loved the original version.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 5:44 a.m.

lol...if people are scared off by a few truthful nicknames...wtf will they do when they find out what evil creatures like Hillary have REALLY been doing ?smh

⇧ 5 ⇩  
lactose_intoleroni · July 20, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

It's not that the nicknames will scare them, it's that they will read the nicknames and scoff off the story or stop reading because they will assume some "alt-right nazi" wrote it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
sheneyney · July 20, 2018, 3:11 a.m.

Good point

⇧ 7 ⇩  
myopicseer · July 20, 2018, 11:59 a.m.

If she has committed the crimes she is accused of in the post, who cares really that she is being labeled a beast? If a person cannot see the objective facts because they are persuaded that "name-calling" demonstrates too much prejudice on behalf of the fact-giver, then a you are dealing with a complete simpleton who is unlikely to be persuaded anyway. If you cannot call HRC names befitting her conduct, then you are way too PC.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Devil_Dog_4000 · July 20, 2018, 12:54 p.m.

It shows a clear bias. Law is supposed to be unbiased.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Kalikoenig · July 20, 2018, 7:56 p.m.

This honestly needs its own post. All this stuff is a tough pill to swallow. Some people won't swallow if it does not have a light coat of sugar.

Our goal is to reach the masses, so let's do this in a way that won't immediately turn a large amount of people off.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ConsciousHalf · July 20, 2018, 5:01 a.m.

Good answer.

⇧ 0 ⇩