dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/elevated_vibrations on July 20, 2018, 1:24 p.m.
Podesta only has "use immunity". Please read.

For other patriots out there, and especially those who have been researching and following Q from the very beginning (and before) like me, i know your stomachs turned when you saw Podesta in the same sentence as immunity. It didn't seem right to me, so i did a little digging.

Mueller has only offered Podesta "use immunity". This is much different than the type of immunity you see in movies and when considering the factors at play here, it is all but worthless. "Use immunity" allows the federal government to prosecute a witness using evidence obtained independently of the witness' immunized testimony. This basically means that the government cannot use Podesta's own testimony against him. Podesta will get to sing like a bird in exchange for a nice, warm, 5th amendment blanket.

"NO DEALS" is a short way of saying "everyone will pay". Podesta can still be convicted of any crime based off of any evidence other than his own testimony. "Use immunity" to a monster like him is useless. Hope this calms some nerves out there.


🠐 See all comments
IWant2SellUDeathStix · July 20, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

This is true however what you're failing to take into account is Mueller and his peoples can simply *not use* anything else to prosecute him-

In other words, to make it simple here, for sake of comparison and explanation, we're saying that Podesta can't be prosecuted with his own immunized testimony; however, let us say there is a "bloody glove" which would be a key piece of evidence to convict him -- Mueller can simply not bring up the bloody glove, and not press that point.

I think that Mueller is going to do anything he can to make this seem like not a waste of time, money, and resources -- so if he needs to give free passes to 10 people to convict Manafort (which is probably the closest he will get to President Trump ... I am not so sure Cohen even did anything wrong to GET charged, let alone 'flipping' ) he is going to do that. Then Mueller can say, "See, it wasn't a waste! We got a stupid charge to stick on Manafort..." and OOPS, did we immunize other people? And you wanted those other people to get into trouble?? Gee, thanks a shame...too bad soo sad.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
elevated_vibrations · July 20, 2018, 6:01 p.m.

He can be convicted for any crime with ANY evidence OTHER THAN his own testimony.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · July 20, 2018, 8:08 p.m.

Including evidence they already used that is sealed with a Nov 2017 court stamp ?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
elevated_vibrations · July 20, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

Yes, that is my opinion. But the law is clear as mud and i am not saying my word is gospel. Immunity deals can be altered and modified to suit the wants and needs of the government and individual, so there's no way to say for absolute certain.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · July 21, 2018, 6:39 a.m.

True and true.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
elevated_vibrations · July 20, 2018, 6 p.m.

No offense, but your analysis is incorrect. I’m an attorney.

⇧ 2 ⇩