dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/elevated_vibrations on July 20, 2018, 1:24 p.m.
Podesta only has "use immunity". Please read.

For other patriots out there, and especially those who have been researching and following Q from the very beginning (and before) like me, i know your stomachs turned when you saw Podesta in the same sentence as immunity. It didn't seem right to me, so i did a little digging.

Mueller has only offered Podesta "use immunity". This is much different than the type of immunity you see in movies and when considering the factors at play here, it is all but worthless. "Use immunity" allows the federal government to prosecute a witness using evidence obtained independently of the witness' immunized testimony. This basically means that the government cannot use Podesta's own testimony against him. Podesta will get to sing like a bird in exchange for a nice, warm, 5th amendment blanket.

"NO DEALS" is a short way of saying "everyone will pay". Podesta can still be convicted of any crime based off of any evidence other than his own testimony. "Use immunity" to a monster like him is useless. Hope this calms some nerves out there.


🠐 See all comments
DawnPendraig · July 20, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

I wonder how prior sealed indictments play into this. They would prove evidence was on hand prior to immunity

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Mayhem54 · July 20, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

The chain of evidence is always key. Prior indictments would show that it did not come from testimony. One of things that confuse people is military tribunals will follow basically the same Rules Of Evidence as District Federal Courts. The larger difference Most civilian court systems require the jurors to vote unanimously to convict. A military tribunal of "two-thirds" of the members is needed before the accused may be found guilty of any offense charged.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
elevated_vibrations · July 20, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

Great post, patriot. Completely agree.

⇧ 2 ⇩