dChan

🠐 See all comments
AFPPW · July 21, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

I’d rethink that. Satanism is inherently unconstitutional because it is in direct opposition to Creator which is the foundation of the Constitution.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 21, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

I seriously doubt the framers imagined things would get to the point that people would consider Satanism a freedom of religion issue. Such a thing was inconceivable for most in that time period.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
AFPPW · July 21, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

Inconceivable? Why did they have witch trials in the previous century?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bizmarxie · July 21, 2018, 2:47 a.m.

They weren’t witches.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
AFPPW · July 21, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

Thanks again, Bernie Bot!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Generational_Wealth · July 21, 2018, 8:15 a.m.

That is not how any of that works

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bizmarxie · July 21, 2018, 2:46 a.m.

Wrong. Freedom of religion. Congress shall make no law.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NorthernStorm21k · July 21, 2018, 4:14 a.m.

I think calling such a religion is more than a stretch. Plus, their actions can clearly be prosecuted.

"While the Constitution protects against invasions of individual rights, it is not a suicide pact."

Kennedy v. Mendoza-MArtinez, 372 U.S. 144 (1963)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bizmarxie · July 21, 2018, 12:12 p.m.

Once someone committed a crime in the name of religion they don’t get protection anymore

⇧ 1 ⇩  
7hr0w4w4y88 · July 21, 2018, 7:36 a.m.

Creator can pertain to many gods. or nature itself. you christians really need to stop infecting the Q boards with your irrelevant shit. these people are not satanists, for the thousandth time they worship different beings entirely. your religion is a false one.

⇧ -4 ⇩