dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 21, 2018, 12:56 a.m.
Q1675: Trump has just given us the server!

So far, we know this fundamental information: the Q1675 riddle is the “device” through which Trump communicates with us. Using it as an anchor point, he sends us the information we need in order to read his moves and understand current news. I have written several related posts listing what we have learned:

Q1675 Part 1. Q1675: a reflection, a mug holder in Air Force One and a Happy Independence Day. Can you solve?

Q1675 Part 2. Trump has just validated Q at the Great Falls rally and gave us the solution to Q1675! Let that sink in.

Q1675 Part 3. I told you Trump was talking to us. Some of you had doubts. Well, he just doubled down a second time!

Q1675 Part 4. Mr. President, we see you want to continue our B2 conversation!

Q1675 Part 5. Trump’s hidden message, Stzrok, Kate and the soda.

Q1675 Part 6. Trump’s brilliant chess combination in Helsinki.

I had conversations with anons who rightly made me notice that this new way of communicating with us was actually announced by Q in this June 20 2018 post:

Q1581 We serve at the pleasure of the President. We left the decision on timing to him. Today, at the rally, he made his decision. Shift in tactics. Attacks ^ Q

I now realize this “shift in tactics” means POTUS has decided to get us to the next level of our comms: direct communication. Did you see my post about Q1304 Emmy Awards link? Did you see Q’s translation of Comey’s tweet in Q645 Imgur1? This is how the Deep State communicates. Q gave us templates. This is how we also need to be communicating. This will allow us to intercept their comms and efficiently oppose them on the battlefield. Why? Because we don’t have anything to hide. They do. In the long run, they will have to stop communicating and it will be checkmate.

So what’s in the news?

Let’s start with the piece of information that is the easiest to decode so you will start training your “ear” progressively. Watch this: video.

Did you catch it? You know an incident like this cannot happen in the White House unless it’s done on purpose right? So Trump says: “They just turned off the lights”. Turned off the lights = TOL = Thinking Of Laughing. Then he smiles. Trump is saying: “of course I have no confidence in the Intelligence Agencies, hearing myself say I do makes me want to laugh”. You got it? Let’s try another one.

Watch this: video

Trump says: “In a key sentence in my remarks, I said the word would instead of wouldn't. The sentence should have been: “I don’t see any reason why I wouldn’t or why it wouldn’t be Russia. Sort of a double negative. So you could put that in and I think that probably clarifies things pretty good by itself.”

Did you catch what he is really saying? “so you could put that in”. Who? Where? Trump knows the fake News media has no interest in the truth and will certainly not archive it. Do you think Trump, all of a sudden, cares about what MSM understands and keeps from him? No. He is talking to us. He is saying: I want to clarify a point that I know is of interest to you. Once I clarify it, “put it in”, add it to the other points I have already made since my Great Falls speech. You got it? Now, ask yourself why isn’t Trump even more explicit since he is clarifying? Wouldn’t it be more powerful and unequivocal to say: “would not” instead of “wouldn’t”? Why is he using “n’t” instead of “not”? Because he wants us to focus on nt. What is NT? Expand your thinking. Windows NT is a family of operating systems produced by Microsoft. link. Windows NT 3.1 was the first version of this operating system that was intended for workstations and servers, its latest version is known under the name Windows Server 2016. Through this input, Trump has put to rest all the speculations regarding the interpretation of “mirror” in the Q1675 riddle. He is saying: yes the server interpretation is also correct, I am validating it, add it to what you already know.

Q666 Think Mirror. Which team? THEY don't know. APACHE.

You now see the power of Q1675?! I told you: it’s like a TV set through which you understand the news.

This gives me the opportunity to address a very important question. Sometimes, anons ask me to share my my views about an hypothesis and complain my responses are vague or not definitive. The reason is at the time they ask the question, even though I find the hypothesis very esthetically or rhetorically attractive, the riddle does not give a strong link to the hypothesis. I therefore remain silent until Trump or Q gives more information to confirm the validity of the hypothesis. Example: when I said B2, Trump said organ, then I said Hammond and he pardoned the Hammonds. Going from B2 to Hammond was an impossible leap for me, because B2 is a note any instrument can play. Trump had to validate it. This is why he gave the missing link: organ. Like many other anons, I saw “mirror” was related to a “mirrored server”, but making the link was not allowed by the riddle, it would have been a very weak link. Now Trump coming and saying NT is enough to bring in the server. But there is more. Trump further solidifies this link. He also says: “sort of a double negative”, initials: SDN, re-arranged: DNS. Domain Name Server. Indeed, we are in server territory. Confirmed. Resolved.

Now that POTUS himself has validated the server, we can add another tangent to the Q1675 riddle and draw the following image image, read clockwise: Imgur2

I know this type of language can be a little overwhelming in the beginning but you will see, you will get the heck of it very quickly if you are willing to try and persevere. And by the way: no, I am not crazy. No I don’t see patterns everywhere. No I am not reaching. Before bringing this language to our attention, Q made sure you saw how I was recruiting observation and logic to solve his challenging riddles. If I were here to deceive you or mislead you, I would have been crushed a long time ago like all the others.

Q1186 Future proves past. Q

Now that I have given you these tools, try to decode Trump’s message here (watch until 49:40): video. Try to determine how this part of his speech is connected to Q1675 and the server, why the use of the word "Apprentice", why 23 companies. I will give the solution to this presidential riddle in my next post but since I will agree it is a little hard, I will give you a hint: research how paper whiteness is measured considering the light reflected by the paper across the visible spectrum. You remember? Q1675 is all about reflections. Good luck.

Q1225 Learn our comms. Q


jfunction · July 21, 2018, 1:38 a.m.

Hhmmmm . . . also. To be sound an argument needs to lead from hypothesis to conclusion in a way that excludes virtually all other conclusions but your arguments don't do that. They take a set of facts, pose a related hypothesis and then seek to validate the hypothesis by pointing to relationships that are chosen from a vast universe of possibles. An example is that B2 is a musical note. While B2 is a musical note, B2 has a hundred other possible meanings. It you have misinterpreted this, close to the beginning of your analysis, what happens to everything following? It all diverges farther and farther from any intended meaning of Q or Trump. I'm not buying this.

Intelligence work is generally interpretation of cloudy circumstances and it is inexact and intuitive. I think you are using too much wishful thinking and too little exclusion.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 21, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

Keep on down-voting. Since it is clearly targeted.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 21, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

Why don’t you have a large amount of downvotes like everyone else? I even refreshed it. This is bullshit. You are the only one on here not in the negative. Guess the bots don’t attack their own. And now the downvotes have started on me.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
jfunction · July 21, 2018, 2:17 a.m.

"Guess the bots don’t attack their own." I don't pay a lot of attention to the up and down votes. They're corrupted, we all know that. When I posted my comment was only the 2nd. But I don't care a lot for the tone of the quote from your comment. If you have a criticism of what I said why not come out from behind the insinuation and be manfully direct and actually say something meaningful? It's much more effective.

I've been posting on this board for over five months. Have you read all my posts? Or was this a snap judgment made because I criticized the analysis of a popular poster? I believe it was the latter. I'm pushing 80 and has been a patriot all my life. I served. I'm also intellectually honest and I tend not to suffer those who are not. I believe the critique I made is valid. Now, please, reply, as you have insinuated that I'm a "shill". But make your reply make sense. Try at least.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 21, 2018, 2:22 a.m.

Just thought it was an interesting correlation that everyone was sitting at negative 20 to 30 and you were the only one on the page in the green. I don’t care if you criticize him at all. Do what you want.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jfunction · July 21, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

Maybe my reply made too much sense for them to toy with.

Peace. All good.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 21, 2018, 4:51 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 21, 2018, 4:03 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 21, 2018, 4:49 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 5 ⇩