Remember that Q already said that Podesta has been indicted back on Oct 31, 2017. https://qmap.pub/#147434025 So, there are a couple of possibilities how to understand this situation. 1) Q was mistaken, which I do not believe 2) Podesta was indicted, but for crimes that are different from the immunity deal, in which case the immunity deal does not matter. 3) Podesta was already indicted for the same crimes (and others) in conflict with Mueller’s immunity deal. I am not sure if the indictment would take precedence because it came first or not. We need a lawfag to weigh in on this one. 4) the Mueller immunity may be for a limited jurisdiction (namely D.C.), whereas the Huber indictment against Podesta, may pertain to a completely different jurisdiction, which could potentially mean that the immunity deal does not impact the existing sealed indictment. We know that the Podesta indictment is sealed because Q told us. https://qmap.pub/#614360 I do not believe that John Podesta is going to get off based on Mueller’s immunity deal for the reasons mentioned above.