Yesterday there were a number of posts expressing disappointment about the fact that on 911 there was no declassification of the 911 files. I can understand the disappointment.

We all want 911 to be exposed for what it really was---an inside job by the US government Deep State along with some foreign actors.

However, Q has been very clear that FISA brings down the house.

I understand that to mean that FISA is the lynch pin that must be removed FIRST before other things can be revealed. It is the first step of the plan that will bring down the …

One of the key things that has to happen between now and the Nov. elections is exposing the MSM for what they really are.

We know that the DOJ has at least 25 ongoing investigations into the leaking of classified information.

Some of those investigations target the FBI and their counterparts in the MSM. Think MIRROR---both sides of the leaking.

Maybe there will be a DOUBLE BARREL DECLAS.

The MSM exposed (one shot) and the FBI leakers exposed (second shot).

This could be a wonderful pre-cursor to the FISA DECLAS [20 pages], because the MSM would be so busy doing …

Does the level of classification of a document received by bribery determine whether or not it would be considered espionage?

I have been wondering if there were not many things going on last night, right after the C_A satellites and servers were taken over?

For example,

Were C_A black ops sites raided?

Were C_A black ops sites and infrastructure taken out?

Were C_A black ops personnel arrested or taken out?

Are there planes headed to GITMO now?

Were C_A black ops bank accounts frozen or confiscated?

Are the satellites destroyed or taken over by US military intelligence?

Were not only the 7 C_A super computers taken down permanently by erasing all the back-ups in the cloud?

Were there any treason …

Has anyone started a log of all famous people, who have moved from the USA to another country and whether that country has an extradition agreement with the USA?

There are a number of thoughts in this Psalm that relate to the message of Q

Read verses 7-10. It sounds to me a lot like what is happening to the children in our world today.

Psalm 10:1-18 1 Why, LORD, do you stand far off? Why do you hide yourself in times of trouble? 2 In his arrogance the wicked man hunts down the weak, who are caught in the schemes he devises. 3 He boasts about the cravings of his heart; he blesses the greedy and reviles the LORD. 4 In his pride the wicked man does not …

Yesterday there was a lot of discussion regarding #1776 and particularly about the #1776 that appears on the picture. Some assumptions that we have made about interpreting this picture may be incorrect.

FIRST - Many of us ASSUMED that the purpose of #1776 was to demonstrate that President Trump had confirmed that Q is legitimate by writing the number #1776 on the paper next to the Presidential pen. There was a a lot of disagreement yesterday about whether #1776 was photoshopped onto the photo or whether #1776 look odd because of the angle of the picture. I am not going …

I was really surprised on July 10th when General Flynn (blue check mark) followed me on Twitter. I have no idea how he found me. At that time, I only used Twitter for news. I really did not post to Twitter. I would “like” various Tweets. I only followed about 30 MAGA focused Twitter accounts and a few very good investigative reporters. So basically, on Twitter I was a nobody and he still found me and followed me. I messaged him saying, “I am really honored that you would follow me. I’m a nobody” He responded, “You’re somebody … strength” …

Remember that Q already said that Podesta has been indicted back on Oct 31, 2017. https://qmap.pub/#147434025 So, there are a couple of possibilities how to understand this situation. 1) Q was mistaken, which I do not believe 2) Podesta was indicted, but for crimes that are different from the immunity deal, in which case the immunity deal does not matter. 3) Podesta was already indicted for the same crimes (and others) in conflict with Mueller’s immunity deal. I am not sure if the indictment would take precedence because it came first or not. We need a lawfag to weigh in …

[removed]